Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees
Abstract Suitable nest sites are a crucial habitat requirement of ground‐nesting bees, but empirical studies of fossorial solitary bee nesting ecology in the UK are few in number. This study used a citizen science approach to overcome the logistical and temporal barriers associated with this type of...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-10-01
|
| Series: | Ecosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2911 |
| _version_ | 1818475873960984576 |
|---|---|
| author | Stephanie Maher Fabrizio Manco Thomas C. Ings |
| author_facet | Stephanie Maher Fabrizio Manco Thomas C. Ings |
| author_sort | Stephanie Maher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Suitable nest sites are a crucial habitat requirement of ground‐nesting bees, but empirical studies of fossorial solitary bee nesting ecology in the UK are few in number. This study used a citizen science approach to overcome the logistical and temporal barriers associated with this type of research and to gather data on the abiotic environment associated with the nesting aggregations of four fossorial solitary bee species in the UK. Three hundred and ninety‐four records were submitted by the public between March and November 2017. Sixty percent (236) of these records were verified as indicative of active nesting aggregations of the target species. Overall, the species in this study demonstrated the capacity to nest within a broad range of environmental variables. Although Colletes hederae (Schmidt and Westrich 1993) was often reported from sloped, unshaded sites, and Andrena fulva (Müller in Allioni 1766) was regularly associated with flat, shaded locations. This study demonstrated the efficacy of a citizen science approach in surmounting the intrinsic difficulties associated with studying solitary bee nest sites, which are both ephemeral and cryptic structures in the landscape. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T09:18:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-25b94ca727344b2e920642953021073c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2150-8925 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T09:18:19Z |
| publishDate | 2019-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecosphere |
| spelling | doaj.art-25b94ca727344b2e920642953021073c2022-12-22T01:54:46ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252019-10-011010n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.2911Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting beesStephanie Maher0Fabrizio Manco1Thomas C. Ings2Applied Ecology Research Group School of Life Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UKApplied Ecology Research Group School of Life Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UKApplied Ecology Research Group School of Life Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UKAbstract Suitable nest sites are a crucial habitat requirement of ground‐nesting bees, but empirical studies of fossorial solitary bee nesting ecology in the UK are few in number. This study used a citizen science approach to overcome the logistical and temporal barriers associated with this type of research and to gather data on the abiotic environment associated with the nesting aggregations of four fossorial solitary bee species in the UK. Three hundred and ninety‐four records were submitted by the public between March and November 2017. Sixty percent (236) of these records were verified as indicative of active nesting aggregations of the target species. Overall, the species in this study demonstrated the capacity to nest within a broad range of environmental variables. Although Colletes hederae (Schmidt and Westrich 1993) was often reported from sloped, unshaded sites, and Andrena fulva (Müller in Allioni 1766) was regularly associated with flat, shaded locations. This study demonstrated the efficacy of a citizen science approach in surmounting the intrinsic difficulties associated with studying solitary bee nest sites, which are both ephemeral and cryptic structures in the landscape.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2911citizen scienceground‐nesting beesnesting ecologysolitary bees |
| spellingShingle | Stephanie Maher Fabrizio Manco Thomas C. Ings Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees Ecosphere citizen science ground‐nesting bees nesting ecology solitary bees |
| title | Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees |
| title_full | Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees |
| title_fullStr | Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees |
| title_full_unstemmed | Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees |
| title_short | Using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground‐nesting bees |
| title_sort | using citizen science to examine the nesting ecology of ground nesting bees |
| topic | citizen science ground‐nesting bees nesting ecology solitary bees |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2911 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stephaniemaher usingcitizensciencetoexaminethenestingecologyofgroundnestingbees AT fabriziomanco usingcitizensciencetoexaminethenestingecologyofgroundnestingbees AT thomascings usingcitizensciencetoexaminethenestingecologyofgroundnestingbees |