Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia

We residents of Samarkand and Bukhara, throughout history aimed to accumulate traditions of challenging the established (often elitist) limits of local culture, economics and history. The cities communities were under constant pressure of the dichotomy between the notions of nomadism and sedentism,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2015-01-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/357
_version_ 1818178266964426752
author Nargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
author_facet Nargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
author_sort Nargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
collection DOAJ
description We residents of Samarkand and Bukhara, throughout history aimed to accumulate traditions of challenging the established (often elitist) limits of local culture, economics and history. The cities communities were under constant pressure of the dichotomy between the notions of nomadism and sedentism, Turkic and Persian speakers. Many community-based units of Samarkand had their own commercial, socio-cultural and educational networks that preserved alternativeness within the life cycle, which balanced between universality and particularism. These lands were dominated by a unique parity, based on Sufi ethics, which designed not syncretic cosmopolitism, but rather introduced the recognition of alternativeness that took into account both similar and diverse waves of ideas. Based on this vision, the author aims to diminish Kantian cosmopolitanism to a level of Euro-American and illustrate the view of cosmopolitanism through a dialogic platform, precisely including its links with the Central Asian versions. Moreover, one cannot identify local cosmopolitanism with the ideas of European Enlightenment, namely individualism and universalism on a global scale. Due to the alternativeness and cosmopolitanism, as well as lack of radical individualism within the local communities, there was no monocultural view on life, since both science and morality (religion, culture, and community) were mutually essential. Nonetheless, present proves that these fields remain their equal vitality to an individual who is capable of simultaneously possessing knowledge about the reality and receiving satisfaction from the reality. This constant motion based on reciprocation was maintained in the ancient culture of Samarkand by two factors: cosmopolitanism and alternativeness.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T20:45:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25c4a71ff7e54fe58e4e5a0914b2065b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-8160
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T20:45:15Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj.art-25c4a71ff7e54fe58e4e5a0914b2065b2022-12-22T00:51:23ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602015-01-01423103111357Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central AsiaNargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva0Институт Востоковедения РАНWe residents of Samarkand and Bukhara, throughout history aimed to accumulate traditions of challenging the established (often elitist) limits of local culture, economics and history. The cities communities were under constant pressure of the dichotomy between the notions of nomadism and sedentism, Turkic and Persian speakers. Many community-based units of Samarkand had their own commercial, socio-cultural and educational networks that preserved alternativeness within the life cycle, which balanced between universality and particularism. These lands were dominated by a unique parity, based on Sufi ethics, which designed not syncretic cosmopolitism, but rather introduced the recognition of alternativeness that took into account both similar and diverse waves of ideas. Based on this vision, the author aims to diminish Kantian cosmopolitanism to a level of Euro-American and illustrate the view of cosmopolitanism through a dialogic platform, precisely including its links with the Central Asian versions. Moreover, one cannot identify local cosmopolitanism with the ideas of European Enlightenment, namely individualism and universalism on a global scale. Due to the alternativeness and cosmopolitanism, as well as lack of radical individualism within the local communities, there was no monocultural view on life, since both science and morality (religion, culture, and community) were mutually essential. Nonetheless, present proves that these fields remain their equal vitality to an individual who is capable of simultaneously possessing knowledge about the reality and receiving satisfaction from the reality. This constant motion based on reciprocation was maintained in the ancient culture of Samarkand by two factors: cosmopolitanism and alternativeness.http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/357городкосмополитизмколониализмальтернативностьдихотомияСамаркандКантРумиобщинакультураАзияРоссияcitycosmopolitanismcolonialismalternativenessdichotomySamarkandKantRumicommunitycultureAsiaRussia
spellingShingle Nargis T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
город
космополитизм
колониализм
альтернативность
дихотомия
Самарканд
Кант
Руми
община
культура
Азия
Россия
city
cosmopolitanism
colonialism
alternativeness
dichotomy
Samarkand
Kant
Rumi
community
culture
Asia
Russia
title Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
title_full Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
title_fullStr Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
title_full_unstemmed Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
title_short Problems of Cosmopolitanism and Alternativeness in the History of Central Asia
title_sort problems of cosmopolitanism and alternativeness in the history of central asia
topic город
космополитизм
колониализм
альтернативность
дихотомия
Самарканд
Кант
Руми
община
культура
Азия
Россия
city
cosmopolitanism
colonialism
alternativeness
dichotomy
Samarkand
Kant
Rumi
community
culture
Asia
Russia
url http://mgimoreview.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/357
work_keys_str_mv AT nargistnurullakhodzhaeva problemsofcosmopolitanismandalternativenessinthehistoryofcentralasia