A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups

It is a challenge to polish the interior surface of an additively manufactured component with complex structures and groove sizes less than 1 mm. Traditional polishing methods are disabled to polish the component, meanwhile keeping the structure intact. To overcome this challenge, small-grooved comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qinming Gu, Zhenyu Zhang, Hongxiu Zhou, Jiaxin Yu, Dong Wang, Junyuan Feng, Chunjing Shi, Jianjun Yang, Junfeng Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad1bba
_version_ 1797352407078797312
author Qinming Gu
Zhenyu Zhang
Hongxiu Zhou
Jiaxin Yu
Dong Wang
Junyuan Feng
Chunjing Shi
Jianjun Yang
Junfeng Qi
author_facet Qinming Gu
Zhenyu Zhang
Hongxiu Zhou
Jiaxin Yu
Dong Wang
Junyuan Feng
Chunjing Shi
Jianjun Yang
Junfeng Qi
author_sort Qinming Gu
collection DOAJ
description It is a challenge to polish the interior surface of an additively manufactured component with complex structures and groove sizes less than 1 mm. Traditional polishing methods are disabled to polish the component, meanwhile keeping the structure intact. To overcome this challenge, small-grooved components made of aluminum alloy with sizes less than 1 mm were fabricated by a custom-made printer. A novel approach to multi-phase jet (MPJ) polishing is proposed, utilizing a self-developed polisher that incorporates solid, liquid, and gas phases. In contrast, abrasive air jet (AAJ) polishing is recommended, employing a customized polisher that combines solid and gas phases. After jet polishing, surface roughness ( Sa ) on the interior surface of grooves decreases from pristine 8.596 μ m to 0.701 μ m and 0.336 μ m via AAJ polishing and MPJ polishing, respectively, and Sa reduces 92% and 96%, correspondingly. Furthermore, a formula defining the relationship between linear energy density and unit defect volume has been developed. The optimized parameters in additive manufacturing are that linear energy density varies from 0.135 J mm ^−1 to 0.22 J mm ^−1 . The unit area defect volume achieved via the optimized parameters decreases to 1/12 of that achieved via non-optimized ones. Computational fluid dynamics simulation results reveal that material is removed by shear stress, and the alumina abrasives experience multiple collisions with the defects on the heat pipe groove, resulting in uniform material removal. This is in good agreement with the experimental results. The novel proposed setups, approach, and findings provide new insights into manufacturing complex-structured components, polishing the small-grooved structure, and keeping it unbroken.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:16:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25d2ab71c1634ee4b43c400efb4d111b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2631-7990
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:16:04Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
spelling doaj.art-25d2ab71c1634ee4b43c400efb4d111b2024-01-18T06:42:33ZengIOP PublishingInternational Journal of Extreme Manufacturing2631-79902024-01-016202510110.1088/2631-7990/ad1bbaA novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setupsQinming Gu0Zhenyu Zhang1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-520XHongxiu Zhou2Jiaxin Yu3Dong Wang4Junyuan Feng5Chunjing Shi6Jianjun Yang7Junfeng Qi8State Key Laboratory of High-performance Precision Manufacturing, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of ChinaState Key Laboratory of High-performance Precision Manufacturing, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of ChinaKey Laboratory of Testing Technology for Manufacturing Process, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology , Mianyang 621010, People’s Republic of ChinaState Key Laboratory of High-performance Precision Manufacturing, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of China; Beijing Spacecraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd, China Academy of Space Technology , Beijing 100094, People’s Republic of ChinaState Key Laboratory of High-performance Precision Manufacturing, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University , Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of ChinaFacility Design and Instrumentation Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center (CARDC) , Mianyang 621000, People’s Republic of ChinaBeijing Spacecraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd, China Academy of Space Technology , Beijing 100094, People’s Republic of ChinaIt is a challenge to polish the interior surface of an additively manufactured component with complex structures and groove sizes less than 1 mm. Traditional polishing methods are disabled to polish the component, meanwhile keeping the structure intact. To overcome this challenge, small-grooved components made of aluminum alloy with sizes less than 1 mm were fabricated by a custom-made printer. A novel approach to multi-phase jet (MPJ) polishing is proposed, utilizing a self-developed polisher that incorporates solid, liquid, and gas phases. In contrast, abrasive air jet (AAJ) polishing is recommended, employing a customized polisher that combines solid and gas phases. After jet polishing, surface roughness ( Sa ) on the interior surface of grooves decreases from pristine 8.596 μ m to 0.701 μ m and 0.336 μ m via AAJ polishing and MPJ polishing, respectively, and Sa reduces 92% and 96%, correspondingly. Furthermore, a formula defining the relationship between linear energy density and unit defect volume has been developed. The optimized parameters in additive manufacturing are that linear energy density varies from 0.135 J mm ^−1 to 0.22 J mm ^−1 . The unit area defect volume achieved via the optimized parameters decreases to 1/12 of that achieved via non-optimized ones. Computational fluid dynamics simulation results reveal that material is removed by shear stress, and the alumina abrasives experience multiple collisions with the defects on the heat pipe groove, resulting in uniform material removal. This is in good agreement with the experimental results. The novel proposed setups, approach, and findings provide new insights into manufacturing complex-structured components, polishing the small-grooved structure, and keeping it unbroken.https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad1bbaabrasive air jet polishingmulti-phase jet polishinginterior curved surfacesmall-grooved componentaluminum alloy
spellingShingle Qinming Gu
Zhenyu Zhang
Hongxiu Zhou
Jiaxin Yu
Dong Wang
Junyuan Feng
Chunjing Shi
Jianjun Yang
Junfeng Qi
A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
abrasive air jet polishing
multi-phase jet polishing
interior curved surface
small-grooved component
aluminum alloy
title A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
title_full A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
title_fullStr A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
title_full_unstemmed A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
title_short A novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small-grooved components using three developed setups
title_sort novel approach of jet polishing for interior surface of small grooved components using three developed setups
topic abrasive air jet polishing
multi-phase jet polishing
interior curved surface
small-grooved component
aluminum alloy
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad1bba
work_keys_str_mv AT qinminggu anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT zhenyuzhang anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT hongxiuzhou anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT jiaxinyu anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT dongwang anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT junyuanfeng anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT chunjingshi anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT jianjunyang anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT junfengqi anovelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT qinminggu novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT zhenyuzhang novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT hongxiuzhou novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT jiaxinyu novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT dongwang novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT junyuanfeng novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT chunjingshi novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT jianjunyang novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups
AT junfengqi novelapproachofjetpolishingforinteriorsurfaceofsmallgroovedcomponentsusingthreedevelopedsetups