To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question

The present review takes steps from the domain of the shell model into open shell nuclei. The question posed in the title is to dramatize how far shell model approaches, i.e., many nucleons occupying independent-particle configurations and interacting through two-body forces (a configuration interac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew E. Stuchbery, John L. Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8174/4/3/48
_version_ 1797483451599814656
author Andrew E. Stuchbery
John L. Wood
author_facet Andrew E. Stuchbery
John L. Wood
author_sort Andrew E. Stuchbery
collection DOAJ
description The present review takes steps from the domain of the shell model into open shell nuclei. The question posed in the title is to dramatize how far shell model approaches, i.e., many nucleons occupying independent-particle configurations and interacting through two-body forces (a configuration interaction problem) can provide a description of nuclei as one explores the structure observed where neither proton nor neutron numbers match closed shells. Features of doubly closed and singly closed shell nuclei and adjacent nuclei are sketched, together with the roles played by seniority, shape coexistence, triaxial shapes and particle–core coupling in organizing data. An illuminating step is taken here to provide a detailed study the reduced transition rates, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn><mo>;</mo><msubsup><mn>2</mn><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup><mo>→</mo><msubsup><mn>0</mn><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>), in the singly closed shell nuclei with doubly closed shell plus or minus a pair of identical nucleons, and the confrontation between such data and state-of-the-art shell model calculations: this amounts to a review of the effective charge problem. The results raise many questions and point to the need for much further work. Some guidance on criteria for sharpening the division between the domain of the shell model and that of deformation-based descriptions of nuclei are provided. The paper is closed with a sketch of a promising direction in terms of the algebraic structure embodied in the symplectic shell model.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:48:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25da493a228b4c33837974655edeb587
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-8174
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:48:11Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Physics
spelling doaj.art-25da493a228b4c33837974655edeb5872023-11-23T18:25:27ZengMDPI AGPhysics2624-81742022-06-014369777310.3390/physics4030048To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the QuestionAndrew E. Stuchbery0John L. Wood1Department of Nuclear Physics and Accelerator Applications, Research School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, AustraliaSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USAThe present review takes steps from the domain of the shell model into open shell nuclei. The question posed in the title is to dramatize how far shell model approaches, i.e., many nucleons occupying independent-particle configurations and interacting through two-body forces (a configuration interaction problem) can provide a description of nuclei as one explores the structure observed where neither proton nor neutron numbers match closed shells. Features of doubly closed and singly closed shell nuclei and adjacent nuclei are sketched, together with the roles played by seniority, shape coexistence, triaxial shapes and particle–core coupling in organizing data. An illuminating step is taken here to provide a detailed study the reduced transition rates, <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn><mo>;</mo><msubsup><mn>2</mn><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup><mo>→</mo><msubsup><mn>0</mn><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo></msubsup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>), in the singly closed shell nuclei with doubly closed shell plus or minus a pair of identical nucleons, and the confrontation between such data and state-of-the-art shell model calculations: this amounts to a review of the effective charge problem. The results raise many questions and point to the need for much further work. Some guidance on criteria for sharpening the division between the domain of the shell model and that of deformation-based descriptions of nuclei are provided. The paper is closed with a sketch of a promising direction in terms of the algebraic structure embodied in the symplectic shell model.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8174/4/3/48nuclear structureshell modelseniorityshape coexistenceeffective chargeemergent structure
spellingShingle Andrew E. Stuchbery
John L. Wood
To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
Physics
nuclear structure
shell model
seniority
shape coexistence
effective charge
emergent structure
title To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
title_full To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
title_fullStr To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
title_full_unstemmed To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
title_short To Shell Model, or Not to Shell Model, That Is the Question
title_sort to shell model or not to shell model that is the question
topic nuclear structure
shell model
seniority
shape coexistence
effective charge
emergent structure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8174/4/3/48
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewestuchbery toshellmodelornottoshellmodelthatisthequestion
AT johnlwood toshellmodelornottoshellmodelthatisthequestion