Arbitration Reform

УДК 347.73:341.63Subject. This informational article highlights recent changes to the Russian legislation on arbitration.Purpose. To highlight the most important aspects of arbitration law reform, and examines the effects they will have on the development of arbitration in RussiaMethodology. The aut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. Stepurina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Dostoevsky Omsk State University 2017-06-01
Series:Pravoprimenenie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/88
_version_ 1797874047106678784
author S. Stepurina
author_facet S. Stepurina
author_sort S. Stepurina
collection DOAJ
description УДК 347.73:341.63Subject. This informational article highlights recent changes to the Russian legislation on arbitration.Purpose. To highlight the most important aspects of arbitration law reform, and examines the effects they will have on the development of arbitration in RussiaMethodology. The author uses a formal-legal method.Results, scope of application. The author distinguishes the difference between constantly acting arbitration courts and arbitration courts ad hoc). The special status of a number of arbitration institutions (the ICAC and MAC at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry), is contrary to the constitutional principle of equality under the law. A major achievement of the new legislation on arbitration courts is expanding the range arbitrarily disputes.Conclusions. The new legislation more clearly prescribed the interaction of arbitration and state courts, including requiring the latter to promote the arbitrators, acting under the regulations of the permanent arbitration institutions in obtaining evidence.In addition, the reform of the arbitration law have left aside the problem of improving the quality of judicial control over arbitration decisions.The arbitration law will still be able to improve the arbitration, to enhance its credibility and attractiveness for the participants of civil turnover.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T01:24:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25e63d4d88894c6ebd1addb93cddf0ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2542-1514
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T01:24:43Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Dostoevsky Omsk State University
record_format Article
series Pravoprimenenie
spelling doaj.art-25e63d4d88894c6ebd1addb93cddf0ad2023-03-13T09:40:19ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityPravoprimenenie2542-15142017-06-011222723110.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).227-23172Arbitration ReformS. Stepurina0Dostoevsky Omsk State UniversityУДК 347.73:341.63Subject. This informational article highlights recent changes to the Russian legislation on arbitration.Purpose. To highlight the most important aspects of arbitration law reform, and examines the effects they will have on the development of arbitration in RussiaMethodology. The author uses a formal-legal method.Results, scope of application. The author distinguishes the difference between constantly acting arbitration courts and arbitration courts ad hoc). The special status of a number of arbitration institutions (the ICAC and MAC at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry), is contrary to the constitutional principle of equality under the law. A major achievement of the new legislation on arbitration courts is expanding the range arbitrarily disputes.Conclusions. The new legislation more clearly prescribed the interaction of arbitration and state courts, including requiring the latter to promote the arbitrators, acting under the regulations of the permanent arbitration institutions in obtaining evidence.In addition, the reform of the arbitration law have left aside the problem of improving the quality of judicial control over arbitration decisions.The arbitration law will still be able to improve the arbitration, to enhance its credibility and attractiveness for the participants of civil turnover.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/88arbitrationarbitration reformarbitration proceedingsarbitration court ad hocarbitrability
spellingShingle S. Stepurina
Arbitration Reform
Pravoprimenenie
arbitration
arbitration reform
arbitration proceedings
arbitration court ad hoc
arbitrability
title Arbitration Reform
title_full Arbitration Reform
title_fullStr Arbitration Reform
title_full_unstemmed Arbitration Reform
title_short Arbitration Reform
title_sort arbitration reform
topic arbitration
arbitration reform
arbitration proceedings
arbitration court ad hoc
arbitrability
url https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/88
work_keys_str_mv AT sstepurina arbitrationreform