Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells

Solid oxide electrolyser (SOE) technology can become a key player in energy systems, with increasing shares of electricity from fluctuating sources such as wind and solar, contributing to power grid balance and energy storage as well as providing green fuels for transportation. Most mature SOE confi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anke Hagen, Riccardo Caldogno, Federico Capotondo, Xiufu Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2045
_version_ 1827649154252275712
author Anke Hagen
Riccardo Caldogno
Federico Capotondo
Xiufu Sun
author_facet Anke Hagen
Riccardo Caldogno
Federico Capotondo
Xiufu Sun
author_sort Anke Hagen
collection DOAJ
description Solid oxide electrolyser (SOE) technology can become a key player in energy systems, with increasing shares of electricity from fluctuating sources such as wind and solar, contributing to power grid balance and energy storage as well as providing green fuels for transportation. Most mature SOE configurations are electrolyte supported or fuel electrode supported. Metal supported SOE cell configurations are an interesting concept for decreasing costs and increasing robustness. The present study compares fuel electrode supported and metal supported cells in terms of performance and durability under SOE conditions. Special emphasis was on medium temperature operating conditions of 650 °C. Metal supported cells, fabricated using ceramic processing methods, showed a better performance compared to state-of-the-art (SoA) cells with Ni/YSZ fuel electrode supported configuration, fabricated by tape casting and screen printing, under steam electrolysis conditions at 700 and 650 °C. The area specific cell resistance (ASR) was lower by ca. 20% for the metal supported cell in 50% H<sub>2</sub>O in H<sub>2</sub> vs. air at 650 °C. Furthermore, the metal supported cells showed a stable performance—even a slight activation—during long-term steam electrolysis tests over 500 h at 650 °C and −0.25 and −0.5 A/cm<sup>2</sup>, while the SoA reference cell degraded with 13%/1000 h under the same conditions.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:52:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25e8e5b3f2b4408190f108ca6446abdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:52:53Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-25e8e5b3f2b4408190f108ca6446abdd2023-11-24T01:03:43ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-03-01156204510.3390/en15062045Metal Supported Electrolysis CellsAnke Hagen0Riccardo Caldogno1Federico Capotondo2Xiufu Sun3DTU Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej B. 310, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, DenmarkDTU Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej B. 310, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, DenmarkDTU Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej B. 310, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, DenmarkDTU Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Fysikvej B. 310, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, DenmarkSolid oxide electrolyser (SOE) technology can become a key player in energy systems, with increasing shares of electricity from fluctuating sources such as wind and solar, contributing to power grid balance and energy storage as well as providing green fuels for transportation. Most mature SOE configurations are electrolyte supported or fuel electrode supported. Metal supported SOE cell configurations are an interesting concept for decreasing costs and increasing robustness. The present study compares fuel electrode supported and metal supported cells in terms of performance and durability under SOE conditions. Special emphasis was on medium temperature operating conditions of 650 °C. Metal supported cells, fabricated using ceramic processing methods, showed a better performance compared to state-of-the-art (SoA) cells with Ni/YSZ fuel electrode supported configuration, fabricated by tape casting and screen printing, under steam electrolysis conditions at 700 and 650 °C. The area specific cell resistance (ASR) was lower by ca. 20% for the metal supported cell in 50% H<sub>2</sub>O in H<sub>2</sub> vs. air at 650 °C. Furthermore, the metal supported cells showed a stable performance—even a slight activation—during long-term steam electrolysis tests over 500 h at 650 °C and −0.25 and −0.5 A/cm<sup>2</sup>, while the SoA reference cell degraded with 13%/1000 h under the same conditions.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2045SOEmetal supported celldurability
spellingShingle Anke Hagen
Riccardo Caldogno
Federico Capotondo
Xiufu Sun
Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
Energies
SOE
metal supported cell
durability
title Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
title_full Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
title_fullStr Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
title_full_unstemmed Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
title_short Metal Supported Electrolysis Cells
title_sort metal supported electrolysis cells
topic SOE
metal supported cell
durability
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2045
work_keys_str_mv AT ankehagen metalsupportedelectrolysiscells
AT riccardocaldogno metalsupportedelectrolysiscells
AT federicocapotondo metalsupportedelectrolysiscells
AT xiufusun metalsupportedelectrolysiscells