COVID-19 lockdown during field work
This paper describes the consequences that the non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the data collection of the panel study ReGES and the solution adopted to continue the field work. The NPI were introduced during the 7th wave of the ReGES stud...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Survey Research Association
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Survey Research Methods |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7753 |
| _version_ | 1811319993471598592 |
|---|---|
| author | Gisela Will Regina Becker Dominik Weigand |
| author_facet | Gisela Will Regina Becker Dominik Weigand |
| author_sort | Gisela Will |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This paper describes the consequences that the non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the data collection of the panel study ReGES and the solution adopted to continue the field work. The NPI were introduced during the 7th wave of the ReGES study and led to a disruption of the field work. In order to continue the field and to keep the data collected after the NPI comparable to the one collected before the NPI, we decided to switch the face-to-face mode to a telephone interview. The switch made content-related as well as technical and methodological adjustments to the instruments necessary. We also discuss methodological issues that must be taken into account when preparing and analysing the data.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T12:51:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-25f2a21e240f469b819cebfd6a522d8c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1864-3361 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T12:51:50Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | European Survey Research Association |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Survey Research Methods |
| spelling | doaj.art-25f2a21e240f469b819cebfd6a522d8c2022-12-22T02:46:11ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33612020-06-0114210.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7753COVID-19 lockdown during field workGisela Will0Regina Becker1Dominik Weigand2Leibniz Institute for Educational TrajectoriesLeibniz Institute for Educational TrajectoriesLeibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories This paper describes the consequences that the non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the data collection of the panel study ReGES and the solution adopted to continue the field work. The NPI were introduced during the 7th wave of the ReGES study and led to a disruption of the field work. In order to continue the field and to keep the data collected after the NPI comparable to the one collected before the NPI, we decided to switch the face-to-face mode to a telephone interview. The switch made content-related as well as technical and methodological adjustments to the instruments necessary. We also discuss methodological issues that must be taken into account when preparing and analysing the data. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7753mode switchrefugeesframing |
| spellingShingle | Gisela Will Regina Becker Dominik Weigand COVID-19 lockdown during field work Survey Research Methods mode switch refugees framing |
| title | COVID-19 lockdown during field work |
| title_full | COVID-19 lockdown during field work |
| title_fullStr | COVID-19 lockdown during field work |
| title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 lockdown during field work |
| title_short | COVID-19 lockdown during field work |
| title_sort | covid 19 lockdown during field work |
| topic | mode switch refugees framing |
| url | https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/7753 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT giselawill covid19lockdownduringfieldwork AT reginabecker covid19lockdownduringfieldwork AT dominikweigand covid19lockdownduringfieldwork |