Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data

Land cover maps are indispensable for decision making, monitoring, and management in agricultural areas, but they are often only available after harvesting. To obtain a timely crop map of a small-scale arable landscape in the Swiss Plateau, we acquired uncalibrated, very high-resolution data, with a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas E. Böhler, Michael E. Schaepman, Mathias Kneubühler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1282
_version_ 1818501813830156288
author Jonas E. Böhler
Michael E. Schaepman
Mathias Kneubühler
author_facet Jonas E. Böhler
Michael E. Schaepman
Mathias Kneubühler
author_sort Jonas E. Böhler
collection DOAJ
description Land cover maps are indispensable for decision making, monitoring, and management in agricultural areas, but they are often only available after harvesting. To obtain a timely crop map of a small-scale arable landscape in the Swiss Plateau, we acquired uncalibrated, very high-resolution data, with a spatial resolution of 0.05 m and four spectral bands, using a consumer-grade camera on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in June 2015. We resampled the data to different spatial and spectral resolutions, and evaluated the method using textural features (first order statistics and mathematical morphology), a random forest classifier for best performance, as well as number and size of the structuring elements. Our main findings suggest the overall best performing data consisting of a spatial resolution of 0.5 m, three spectral bands (RGB—red, green, and blue), and five different sizes of the structuring elements. The overall accuracy (OA) for the full set of crop classes based on a pixel-based classification is 66.7%. In case of a merged set of crops, the OA increases by ~7% (74.0%). For an object-based classification based on individual field parcels, the OA increases by ~20% (OA of 86.3% for the full set of crop classes, and 94.6% for the merged set, respectively). We conclude the use of UAV to be most relevant at 0.5 m spatial resolution in heterogeneous arable landscapes when used for crop classification.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:01:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-25f77da4fed3447e960a2098b9c75521
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:01:23Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-25f77da4fed3447e960a2098b9c755212022-12-22T01:33:47ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922018-08-01108128210.3390/rs10081282rs10081282Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV DataJonas E. Böhler0Michael E. Schaepman1Mathias Kneubühler2Department of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories (RSL), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories (RSL), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories (RSL), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandLand cover maps are indispensable for decision making, monitoring, and management in agricultural areas, but they are often only available after harvesting. To obtain a timely crop map of a small-scale arable landscape in the Swiss Plateau, we acquired uncalibrated, very high-resolution data, with a spatial resolution of 0.05 m and four spectral bands, using a consumer-grade camera on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in June 2015. We resampled the data to different spatial and spectral resolutions, and evaluated the method using textural features (first order statistics and mathematical morphology), a random forest classifier for best performance, as well as number and size of the structuring elements. Our main findings suggest the overall best performing data consisting of a spatial resolution of 0.5 m, three spectral bands (RGB—red, green, and blue), and five different sizes of the structuring elements. The overall accuracy (OA) for the full set of crop classes based on a pixel-based classification is 66.7%. In case of a merged set of crops, the OA increases by ~7% (74.0%). For an object-based classification based on individual field parcels, the OA increases by ~20% (OA of 86.3% for the full set of crop classes, and 94.6% for the merged set, respectively). We conclude the use of UAV to be most relevant at 0.5 m spatial resolution in heterogeneous arable landscapes when used for crop classification.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1282consumer-grade cameraland coververy high resolution (VHR)random forest (RF) classifierobject-based classificationpixel-based classificationsmall-scaled agricultural fieldstexturespatial feature
spellingShingle Jonas E. Böhler
Michael E. Schaepman
Mathias Kneubühler
Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
Remote Sensing
consumer-grade camera
land cover
very high resolution (VHR)
random forest (RF) classifier
object-based classification
pixel-based classification
small-scaled agricultural fields
texture
spatial feature
title Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
title_full Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
title_fullStr Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
title_full_unstemmed Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
title_short Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data
title_sort crop classification in a heterogeneous arable landscape using uncalibrated uav data
topic consumer-grade camera
land cover
very high resolution (VHR)
random forest (RF) classifier
object-based classification
pixel-based classification
small-scaled agricultural fields
texture
spatial feature
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1282
work_keys_str_mv AT jonasebohler cropclassificationinaheterogeneousarablelandscapeusinguncalibrateduavdata
AT michaeleschaepman cropclassificationinaheterogeneousarablelandscapeusinguncalibrateduavdata
AT mathiaskneubuhler cropclassificationinaheterogeneousarablelandscapeusinguncalibrateduavdata