Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the biological activities of three soldering materials used for joining Co-Cr joints (iron, stainless steel, and brass) on the tissue of the Rabbit. Materials and Meth-ods: Nine specimens of each iron, stainless steel, and brass where made as cylinders (3mm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadira A Hatim, Nazar Gh Jameel, Abdullah J Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2013-04-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_84672_2037fecfe29aaedd1780b07ee1c789a6.html
_version_ 1818495639489609728
author Nadira A Hatim
Nazar Gh Jameel
Abdullah J Mohammed
author_facet Nadira A Hatim
Nazar Gh Jameel
Abdullah J Mohammed
author_sort Nadira A Hatim
collection DOAJ
description Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the biological activities of three soldering materials used for joining Co-Cr joints (iron, stainless steel, and brass) on the tissue of the Rabbit. Materials and Meth-ods: Nine specimens of each iron, stainless steel, and brass where made as cylinders (3mm x 2.5mm). The middle part was made of the brazing materials and the upper and lower parts were made of Co-Cr. These specimens where implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of the rabbit, after two weeks the animals where sacrificed and biopsies where made and examined under microscope by three oral pathologists. Results: Stainless steel implants were the most biocompatible material among the three materials used as brazing materials. Stainless steel sites had insignificant differences with the control sites. Significant difference was found between the iron implanted sites and the control group. This result found by two viewers (A, and M), while the third viewer (Z) found no significant difference between the control group, and the iron implanted sites. Significant difference was found between the brass implanted sites and the control group, this result was found by the three viewers (A, M, and Z). Conclusions: The stainless steel had the most favorable tissue response among the three soldering materials, iron is in the second rank, and brass showed unfavorable tissue response due to release of Cu.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:23:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2604a964c9f74f76801e37e4ed743a8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:23:19Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
record_format Article
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-2604a964c9f74f76801e37e4ed743a8d2022-12-22T01:38:09ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal1812-12171998-03452013-04-0113171310.33899/rden.2012.84672Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium JointsNadira A Hatim Nazar Gh JameelAbdullah J MohammedAims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the biological activities of three soldering materials used for joining Co-Cr joints (iron, stainless steel, and brass) on the tissue of the Rabbit. Materials and Meth-ods: Nine specimens of each iron, stainless steel, and brass where made as cylinders (3mm x 2.5mm). The middle part was made of the brazing materials and the upper and lower parts were made of Co-Cr. These specimens where implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of the rabbit, after two weeks the animals where sacrificed and biopsies where made and examined under microscope by three oral pathologists. Results: Stainless steel implants were the most biocompatible material among the three materials used as brazing materials. Stainless steel sites had insignificant differences with the control sites. Significant difference was found between the iron implanted sites and the control group. This result found by two viewers (A, and M), while the third viewer (Z) found no significant difference between the control group, and the iron implanted sites. Significant difference was found between the brass implanted sites and the control group, this result was found by the three viewers (A, M, and Z). Conclusions: The stainless steel had the most favorable tissue response among the three soldering materials, iron is in the second rank, and brass showed unfavorable tissue response due to release of Cu.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_84672_2037fecfe29aaedd1780b07ee1c789a6.htmlbiocompatibilityco-crsoldering materials.
spellingShingle Nadira A Hatim
Nazar Gh Jameel
Abdullah J Mohammed
Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
biocompatibility
co-cr
soldering materials.
title Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
title_full Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
title_fullStr Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
title_short Biocompatibility of Soldering Materials Used for Repair of Cobalt Chromium Joints
title_sort biocompatibility of soldering materials used for repair of cobalt chromium joints
topic biocompatibility
co-cr
soldering materials.
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_84672_2037fecfe29aaedd1780b07ee1c789a6.html
work_keys_str_mv AT nadiraahatim biocompatibilityofsolderingmaterialsusedforrepairofcobaltchromiumjoints
AT nazarghjameel biocompatibilityofsolderingmaterialsusedforrepairofcobaltchromiumjoints
AT abdullahjmohammed biocompatibilityofsolderingmaterialsusedforrepairofcobaltchromiumjoints