Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions

Background: Occupational voice users (inter alia: lecturers) speak with different levels of vocal intensity. Speakers adjust this intensity knowingly (e.g. to underline the importance of fragments of the speech) or unknowingly. The unknown adjustment of voice intensity occurs e.g. in the presence of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Witold Mikulski, Izabela Jakubowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2013-12-01
Series:Medycyna Pracy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Poziom-natezenia-glosu-wykladowcow-wyniki-badan-przeprowadzonych-podczas-wykladow,513,0,2.html
_version_ 1811242945058177024
author Witold Mikulski
Izabela Jakubowska
author_facet Witold Mikulski
Izabela Jakubowska
author_sort Witold Mikulski
collection DOAJ
description Background: Occupational voice users (inter alia: lecturers) speak with different levels of vocal intensity. Speakers adjust this intensity knowingly (e.g. to underline the importance of fragments of the speech) or unknowingly. The unknown adjustment of voice intensity occurs e.g. in the presence of high acoustic background noise (so-called Lombard effect), but it also results from many other factors: hearing loss, construction of the vocal tract, habits and others. The aim of the article is to confirm the thesis that in similar conditions of acoustic properties of the room different lecturers speak with different levels of vocal intensity. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a group of 10 lecturers in the same conference room. A-weighted sound pressure level determined at 1 m from the lecturer's mouth was adopted as a parameter defining the intensity of the lecturer's voice. The levels of all lecturers' voice intensity were compared and evaluated according to the criteria defined in EN ISO 9921. Results: Nine in ten lecturers were speaking with normal voice intensity (60-65 dB) and only one full-time university lecturer was speaking with raised voice (66-71 dB). Conclusions: It was found that in the room of the same acoustic conditions the lecturers spoke with different intensities of voice. Some lecturers occasionally, and one all the time spoke with the voice intensity specified by PN-EN ISO 9921 as a raised voice. The results of the preliminary study warrant further studies in a larger group of teachers. Med Pr 2013;64(6):797–804
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-26070127a3e2473295f8c2555fe85eca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0465-5893
2353-1339
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:58:29Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series Medycyna Pracy
spelling doaj.art-26070127a3e2473295f8c2555fe85eca2022-12-22T03:30:16ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineMedycyna Pracy0465-58932353-13392013-12-0164679780410.13075/mp.5893.2013.0063Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessionsWitold MikulskiIzabela JakubowskaBackground: Occupational voice users (inter alia: lecturers) speak with different levels of vocal intensity. Speakers adjust this intensity knowingly (e.g. to underline the importance of fragments of the speech) or unknowingly. The unknown adjustment of voice intensity occurs e.g. in the presence of high acoustic background noise (so-called Lombard effect), but it also results from many other factors: hearing loss, construction of the vocal tract, habits and others. The aim of the article is to confirm the thesis that in similar conditions of acoustic properties of the room different lecturers speak with different levels of vocal intensity. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a group of 10 lecturers in the same conference room. A-weighted sound pressure level determined at 1 m from the lecturer's mouth was adopted as a parameter defining the intensity of the lecturer's voice. The levels of all lecturers' voice intensity were compared and evaluated according to the criteria defined in EN ISO 9921. Results: Nine in ten lecturers were speaking with normal voice intensity (60-65 dB) and only one full-time university lecturer was speaking with raised voice (66-71 dB). Conclusions: It was found that in the room of the same acoustic conditions the lecturers spoke with different intensities of voice. Some lecturers occasionally, and one all the time spoke with the voice intensity specified by PN-EN ISO 9921 as a raised voice. The results of the preliminary study warrant further studies in a larger group of teachers. Med Pr 2013;64(6):797–804http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Poziom-natezenia-glosu-wykladowcow-wyniki-badan-przeprowadzonych-podczas-wykladow,513,0,2.htmlvoice intensity levelA-weighted sound pressure level of voiceoccupational voiceLombard’s effect
spellingShingle Witold Mikulski
Izabela Jakubowska
Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
Medycyna Pracy
voice intensity level
A-weighted sound pressure level of voice
occupational voice
Lombard’s effect
title Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
title_full Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
title_fullStr Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
title_full_unstemmed Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
title_short Vocal intensity in lecturers: Results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
title_sort vocal intensity in lecturers results of measurements conducted during lecture sessions
topic voice intensity level
A-weighted sound pressure level of voice
occupational voice
Lombard’s effect
url http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Poziom-natezenia-glosu-wykladowcow-wyniki-badan-przeprowadzonych-podczas-wykladow,513,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT witoldmikulski vocalintensityinlecturersresultsofmeasurementsconductedduringlecturesessions
AT izabelajakubowska vocalintensityinlecturersresultsofmeasurementsconductedduringlecturesessions