REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
Abstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speaking I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Indonesian |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Malang
2016-02-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531 |
| _version_ | 1818982919029391360 |
|---|---|
| author | Miftahul Huda |
| author_facet | Miftahul Huda |
| author_sort | Miftahul Huda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speaking I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to treat a textualized utterance in the sphere of speaker-listener communication, suggesting that the meaning of his utterance is merely what he means by it. This article is built on a premise that the students' interpretation resulted from their comprehensive understanding of the said, i.e. the lecturer's utterance, and the unsaid, which might be construed from his unspoken daily performance in the classroom. This notion also strengthens the presence of intertextuality process in the students' comments since the comments resulted from their previous "reading" of a large number of different "texts", both spoken (the said) and unspoken (the unsaid), provided by the lecturer. With this in mind, there is no reason to view the students' evaluative feedback as indeterminate and tentative; rather, it should be seriously taken into account since their feedback might help him, and any lecturer in general, to improve his future teaching performance. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T17:54:51Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-260d5c8cbd7f4e568711c59ac6da66cd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0215-9643 2442-8655 |
| language | Indonesian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T17:54:51Z |
| publishDate | 2016-02-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Negeri Malang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan |
| spelling | doaj.art-260d5c8cbd7f4e568711c59ac6da66cd2022-12-21T19:30:47ZindUniversitas Negeri MalangJurnal Ilmu Pendidikan0215-96432442-86552016-02-0115310.17977/jip.v15i3.25312286REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMIMiftahul HudaAbstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speaking I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to treat a textualized utterance in the sphere of speaker-listener communication, suggesting that the meaning of his utterance is merely what he means by it. This article is built on a premise that the students' interpretation resulted from their comprehensive understanding of the said, i.e. the lecturer's utterance, and the unsaid, which might be construed from his unspoken daily performance in the classroom. This notion also strengthens the presence of intertextuality process in the students' comments since the comments resulted from their previous "reading" of a large number of different "texts", both spoken (the said) and unspoken (the unsaid), provided by the lecturer. With this in mind, there is no reason to view the students' evaluative feedback as indeterminate and tentative; rather, it should be seriously taken into account since their feedback might help him, and any lecturer in general, to improve his future teaching performance.http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531teaching performanceevaluative commentthe unsaidthe saidintertextualitytentativenessindeterminacy |
| spellingShingle | Miftahul Huda REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan teaching performance evaluative comment the unsaid the said intertextuality tentativeness indeterminacy |
| title | REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI |
| title_full | REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI |
| title_fullStr | REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI |
| title_full_unstemmed | REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI |
| title_short | REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI |
| title_sort | reinterpreting students evaluative comments a reply to basthomi |
| topic | teaching performance evaluative comment the unsaid the said intertextuality tentativeness indeterminacy |
| url | http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT miftahulhuda reinterpretingstudentsevaluativecommentsareplytobasthomi |