Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners

Although explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners are essential to theoretical and pedagogical debates in second language acquisition (SLA), little research has addressed the effects of instructional interventions on the two knowledge types (R. Ellis, 2005).This study examined the relati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: majid Ghorbani, mahmood reza atai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2012-06-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_99_6eb93d11c1b4f50599b62be405eb3ae5.pdf
_version_ 1797378232356438016
author majid Ghorbani
mahmood reza atai
author_facet majid Ghorbani
mahmood reza atai
author_sort majid Ghorbani
collection DOAJ
description Although explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners are essential to theoretical and pedagogical debates in second language acquisition (SLA), little research has addressed the effects of instructional interventions on the two knowledge types (R. Ellis, 2005).This study examined the relative effectiveness of explicit and implicit types of form-focused instruction (FFI) on the acquisition of four morphosyntactic features by four measures of explicit and implicit language knowledge. The measures included: oral elicited imitation, timed and untimed grammaticality judgment, and metalinguistic knowledge tests. A pretest and two posttests were conducted immediately and three weeks after the instructional interventions. Durable effects of FFI on low intermediate Iranian learners were found for the target language forms.In particular, explicit and implicit FFI positively facilitated the development of explicit and implicit knowledge of the target features, both immediately after the instructional interventions and, marginally decreasing, over time. Also, explicit FFI was more effective than implicit FFI as measured by both explicit and implicit knowledge tests. The findings may contribute to understanding of the efficacy of explicit and implicit FFI on L2 learners’ controlled (explicit) and spontaneous (implicit) use of morphosyntactic forms at relatively early stages of L2 acquisition.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2611817fff85481eb7b52c27b8c1fd13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:03:47Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Issues in Language Teaching
spelling doaj.art-2611817fff85481eb7b52c27b8c1fd132023-12-23T10:45:45ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942012-06-0111589299Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learnersmajid Ghorbanimahmood reza ataiAlthough explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners are essential to theoretical and pedagogical debates in second language acquisition (SLA), little research has addressed the effects of instructional interventions on the two knowledge types (R. Ellis, 2005).This study examined the relative effectiveness of explicit and implicit types of form-focused instruction (FFI) on the acquisition of four morphosyntactic features by four measures of explicit and implicit language knowledge. The measures included: oral elicited imitation, timed and untimed grammaticality judgment, and metalinguistic knowledge tests. A pretest and two posttests were conducted immediately and three weeks after the instructional interventions. Durable effects of FFI on low intermediate Iranian learners were found for the target language forms.In particular, explicit and implicit FFI positively facilitated the development of explicit and implicit knowledge of the target features, both immediately after the instructional interventions and, marginally decreasing, over time. Also, explicit FFI was more effective than implicit FFI as measured by both explicit and implicit knowledge tests. The findings may contribute to understanding of the efficacy of explicit and implicit FFI on L2 learners’ controlled (explicit) and spontaneous (implicit) use of morphosyntactic forms at relatively early stages of L2 acquisition.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_99_6eb93d11c1b4f50599b62be405eb3ae5.pdfinstructed slaexplicit/implicit ffiexplicit/implicit knowledge
spellingShingle majid Ghorbani
mahmood reza atai
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
Issues in Language Teaching
instructed sla
explicit/implicit ffi
explicit/implicit knowledge
title Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
title_full Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
title_fullStr Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
title_short Evaluating the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Form-Focused Instruction on Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of EFL Learners
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of explicit and implicit form focused instruction on explicit and implicit knowledge of efl learners
topic instructed sla
explicit/implicit ffi
explicit/implicit knowledge
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_99_6eb93d11c1b4f50599b62be405eb3ae5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT majidghorbani evaluatingtheeffectivenessofexplicitandimplicitformfocusedinstructiononexplicitandimplicitknowledgeofefllearners
AT mahmoodrezaatai evaluatingtheeffectivenessofexplicitandimplicitformfocusedinstructiononexplicitandimplicitknowledgeofefllearners