Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations

Abstract Returning straw to the field is an effective method for optimizing the soil phosphorus (P) availability, in which bacteria play an important role. However, the effects of various straw incorporation strategies on P transformation between different soil P pools remain unclear. In this study,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiahui Pu, Nan Jiang, Yulan Zhang, Lingling Guo, Wenjing Huang, Lijun Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:GCB Bioenergy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13010
_version_ 1811203191012851712
author Jiahui Pu
Nan Jiang
Yulan Zhang
Lingling Guo
Wenjing Huang
Lijun Chen
author_facet Jiahui Pu
Nan Jiang
Yulan Zhang
Lingling Guo
Wenjing Huang
Lijun Chen
author_sort Jiahui Pu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Returning straw to the field is an effective method for optimizing the soil phosphorus (P) availability, in which bacteria play an important role. However, the effects of various straw incorporation strategies on P transformation between different soil P pools remain unclear. In this study, variations in soil P fractions, phosphatase activities and the abundance of phosphatase genes (phoD, phoX and phoC) as well as a P‐solubilizing gene (pqqC) at DNA (total) and cDNA (transcribed) levels were analysed in three straw incorporation treatments, including chopped straw (StrawD), straw compost (Compost) and straw‐derived biochar (Biochar), and control (no straw, CK). Compared with the CK, the moderately labile inorganic P (NaOH I‐Pi) content significantly decreased and the non‐available P (Residual P) content significantly increased in the StrawD treatment. At the same time, phosphodiesterase (PD) activity and the transcribed phoC and phoX genes as well as total pqqC gene abundance significantly increased in the StrawD treatment, suggesting that the input of chopped straw stimulated P transformations from both organic and inorganic P pools. In addition, the stable Pi (NaOH II‐Pi) content and total pqqC gene abundance in the Biochar treatment were significantly higher than that in the CK, indicating that the input of biochar increased the NaOH II‐Pi that could release available P by Pi‐solubilizing bacteria. In comparison to the CK, the Compost input significantly decreased one labile Pi (resin‐Pi) only. However, its P fractions were significantly different from that of CK, Biochar and StrawD treatments, suggesting that the effects of compost input on P should not be ignored. In conclusion, chopped straw input increased soil P transformation but not available P, biochar input may promote inorganic P transformation, and compost input has a latent effect on P transformation. The study provided a comprehensive understanding of straw incorporation strategies for regulating soil P availability.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:51:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-261654033c7f4f4083de8bffae70fa33
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-1693
1757-1707
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:51:34Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series GCB Bioenergy
spelling doaj.art-261654033c7f4f4083de8bffae70fa332022-12-22T03:50:59ZengWileyGCB Bioenergy1757-16931757-17072023-01-01151889810.1111/gcbb.13010Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformationsJiahui Pu0Nan Jiang1Yulan Zhang2Lingling Guo3Wenjing Huang4Lijun Chen5Institute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang ChinaInstitute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang ChinaInstitute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang ChinaMicrobial Research Institute of Liaoning Province Chaoyang ChinaInstitute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang ChinaInstitute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang ChinaAbstract Returning straw to the field is an effective method for optimizing the soil phosphorus (P) availability, in which bacteria play an important role. However, the effects of various straw incorporation strategies on P transformation between different soil P pools remain unclear. In this study, variations in soil P fractions, phosphatase activities and the abundance of phosphatase genes (phoD, phoX and phoC) as well as a P‐solubilizing gene (pqqC) at DNA (total) and cDNA (transcribed) levels were analysed in three straw incorporation treatments, including chopped straw (StrawD), straw compost (Compost) and straw‐derived biochar (Biochar), and control (no straw, CK). Compared with the CK, the moderately labile inorganic P (NaOH I‐Pi) content significantly decreased and the non‐available P (Residual P) content significantly increased in the StrawD treatment. At the same time, phosphodiesterase (PD) activity and the transcribed phoC and phoX genes as well as total pqqC gene abundance significantly increased in the StrawD treatment, suggesting that the input of chopped straw stimulated P transformations from both organic and inorganic P pools. In addition, the stable Pi (NaOH II‐Pi) content and total pqqC gene abundance in the Biochar treatment were significantly higher than that in the CK, indicating that the input of biochar increased the NaOH II‐Pi that could release available P by Pi‐solubilizing bacteria. In comparison to the CK, the Compost input significantly decreased one labile Pi (resin‐Pi) only. However, its P fractions were significantly different from that of CK, Biochar and StrawD treatments, suggesting that the effects of compost input on P should not be ignored. In conclusion, chopped straw input increased soil P transformation but not available P, biochar input may promote inorganic P transformation, and compost input has a latent effect on P transformation. The study provided a comprehensive understanding of straw incorporation strategies for regulating soil P availability.https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13010gene expressionPho regulatory genesphosphatase activitiespqqCreal‐time PCRvarious straw incorporation strategies
spellingShingle Jiahui Pu
Nan Jiang
Yulan Zhang
Lingling Guo
Wenjing Huang
Lijun Chen
Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
GCB Bioenergy
gene expression
Pho regulatory genes
phosphatase activities
pqqC
real‐time PCR
various straw incorporation strategies
title Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
title_full Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
title_fullStr Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
title_short Effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
title_sort effects of various straw incorporation strategies on soil phosphorus fractions and transformations
topic gene expression
Pho regulatory genes
phosphatase activities
pqqC
real‐time PCR
various straw incorporation strategies
url https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13010
work_keys_str_mv AT jiahuipu effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations
AT nanjiang effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations
AT yulanzhang effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations
AT linglingguo effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations
AT wenjinghuang effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations
AT lijunchen effectsofvariousstrawincorporationstrategiesonsoilphosphorusfractionsandtransformations