Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios
Objective To develop a depressive interpretation bias questionnaire with Chinese culture based on the similarity rating task (SRT), and to test its reliability and validity. Methods After being authorized, the ambiguous paragraphs in cognitive behavior modification errors prospective training items...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Office of Journal of Army Medical University
2023-12-01
|
Series: | 陆军军医大学学报 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/html/202301037.htm |
_version_ | 1797372983596023808 |
---|---|
author | ZHENG Feiyu FENG Zhengzhi |
author_facet | ZHENG Feiyu FENG Zhengzhi |
author_sort | ZHENG Feiyu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To develop a depressive interpretation bias questionnaire with Chinese culture based on the similarity rating task (SRT), and to test its reliability and validity. Methods After being authorized, the ambiguous paragraphs in cognitive behavior modification errors prospective training items (CBM-I) were translated and screened in the first round, the screened paragraphs combined with the remaining of SRT and the self-written ambiguous paragraphs to form the screening questionnaire of the second round.Fourteen ambiguous paragraphs were selected as the items, and then the ambiguous situation interpretation bias questionnaire was compiled using SRT as the template.The reliability and validity analysis and item analysis were launched after 477 were tested by the questionnaire mentioned before. Results A 14-item-formed questionnaire was compiled after 2 rounds of screening, then 5 factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 52.67%.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fitted well.Cronbach's α was 0.613, and split-half reliability was 0.617;Paired t-test was used to test the content validity, which showed significant difference between the target sentences and the foil sentences (t=-12.90, P < 0.01).The questionnaire had good criterion validity, regarding the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) in Chinese version as criterion, while the total T score was significantly correlated with the total score of the CES-D (r=-0.224, P < 0.01). Conclusion The interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios is a applicable measurement of depression interpretation bias in China.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:43:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-261f26381b6946698433b184c5ae7314 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2097-0927 |
language | zho |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:43:44Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Journal of Army Medical University |
record_format | Article |
series | 陆军军医大学学报 |
spelling | doaj.art-261f26381b6946698433b184c5ae73142023-12-29T01:50:45ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of Army Medical University陆军军医大学学报2097-09272023-12-0145242586259210.16016/j.2097-0927.202301037Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenariosZHENG Feiyu0FENG Zhengzhi1Outpatient Department, Hospital of Troop 94833, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, 332100Faculty of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaObjective To develop a depressive interpretation bias questionnaire with Chinese culture based on the similarity rating task (SRT), and to test its reliability and validity. Methods After being authorized, the ambiguous paragraphs in cognitive behavior modification errors prospective training items (CBM-I) were translated and screened in the first round, the screened paragraphs combined with the remaining of SRT and the self-written ambiguous paragraphs to form the screening questionnaire of the second round.Fourteen ambiguous paragraphs were selected as the items, and then the ambiguous situation interpretation bias questionnaire was compiled using SRT as the template.The reliability and validity analysis and item analysis were launched after 477 were tested by the questionnaire mentioned before. Results A 14-item-formed questionnaire was compiled after 2 rounds of screening, then 5 factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 52.67%.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fitted well.Cronbach's α was 0.613, and split-half reliability was 0.617;Paired t-test was used to test the content validity, which showed significant difference between the target sentences and the foil sentences (t=-12.90, P < 0.01).The questionnaire had good criterion validity, regarding the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) in Chinese version as criterion, while the total T score was significantly correlated with the total score of the CES-D (r=-0.224, P < 0.01). Conclusion The interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios is a applicable measurement of depression interpretation bias in China. http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/html/202301037.htmdepressioninterpretation biasambiguous scenarios |
spellingShingle | ZHENG Feiyu FENG Zhengzhi Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios 陆军军医大学学报 depression interpretation bias ambiguous scenarios |
title | Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
title_full | Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
title_short | Development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
title_sort | development and validation of interpretation bias questionnaire with ambiguous scenarios |
topic | depression interpretation bias ambiguous scenarios |
url | http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/html/202301037.htm |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengfeiyu developmentandvalidationofinterpretationbiasquestionnairewithambiguousscenarios AT fengzhengzhi developmentandvalidationofinterpretationbiasquestionnairewithambiguousscenarios |