Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
To compare surgical efficacy and postoperative recovery of ultrasonic scalpel (USS) with conventional techniques for the resection of gastric carcinoma.A systematic search of major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, CCRT and CNKI) was conducted. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4117513?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819086703817654272 |
|---|---|
| author | Xiao-Long Chen Xin-Zu Chen Zheng-Hao Lu Li Wang Kun Yang Jian-Kun Hu Bo Zhang Zhi-Xin Chen Jia-Ping Chen Zong-Guang Zhou |
| author_facet | Xiao-Long Chen Xin-Zu Chen Zheng-Hao Lu Li Wang Kun Yang Jian-Kun Hu Bo Zhang Zhi-Xin Chen Jia-Ping Chen Zong-Guang Zhou |
| author_sort | Xiao-Long Chen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | To compare surgical efficacy and postoperative recovery of ultrasonic scalpel (USS) with conventional techniques for the resection of gastric carcinoma.A systematic search of major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, CCRT and CNKI) was conducted. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and nRCTs) were considered eligible. Operation time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (BL) and postoperative complications (POC) rates as well as postoperative hospitalization days, number of dissected lymph nodes, abdominal drainage volume and time for recovery of gastrointestinal functions were synthesized and compared.Nineteen studies were included (7 RCTs and 12 nRCTs), in which 1930 patients were enrolled totally (946 in the USS group and 984 in the conventional group). Monopolar electrocautery and ligation were used as the conventional methods. Comparative meta-analysis showed perioperative outcomes were significantly improved using USS compared with conventional surgical instrumentation. OT was reduced from a weighted mean of 185.3 min in the conventional group to 151.0 min in the USS group (MD = -33.30, 95% CI [-41.75, -24.86], p<0.001) and intraoperative BL was decreased from a weighted mean of 217.9 ml in the conventional group to 111.6 ml in the USS group (MD = -113.42, 95% CI [-142.05, -84.79], p<0.001). Results from RCTs subgroup were consistent with those from nRCTs subgroup. The weighted cumulative risk of POC accounted for 8.9% (0%-25%) and 12.9% (5.5%-45%) in the USS and conventional groups, respectively. Pooled estimated results from nRCTs (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.27, 1.06], p = 0.07) and RCTs (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.44, 1.26], p = 0.27) showed no significant difference between the USS and control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes showed the improvements of the USS group over control group regarding the number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative hospitalization days, abdominal drainage volume and time for recovery of gastrointestinal functions.Compared with conventional electrosurgery, the USS is a safe and effective technique with more short-term advantages in open surgery for gastric cancer. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T21:24:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2622240e83364f01b136761b88cb9d38 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T21:24:28Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-2622240e83364f01b136761b88cb9d382022-12-21T18:49:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10333010.1371/journal.pone.0103330Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Xiao-Long ChenXin-Zu ChenZheng-Hao LuLi WangKun YangJian-Kun HuBo ZhangZhi-Xin ChenJia-Ping ChenZong-Guang ZhouTo compare surgical efficacy and postoperative recovery of ultrasonic scalpel (USS) with conventional techniques for the resection of gastric carcinoma.A systematic search of major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, CCRT and CNKI) was conducted. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and nRCTs) were considered eligible. Operation time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (BL) and postoperative complications (POC) rates as well as postoperative hospitalization days, number of dissected lymph nodes, abdominal drainage volume and time for recovery of gastrointestinal functions were synthesized and compared.Nineteen studies were included (7 RCTs and 12 nRCTs), in which 1930 patients were enrolled totally (946 in the USS group and 984 in the conventional group). Monopolar electrocautery and ligation were used as the conventional methods. Comparative meta-analysis showed perioperative outcomes were significantly improved using USS compared with conventional surgical instrumentation. OT was reduced from a weighted mean of 185.3 min in the conventional group to 151.0 min in the USS group (MD = -33.30, 95% CI [-41.75, -24.86], p<0.001) and intraoperative BL was decreased from a weighted mean of 217.9 ml in the conventional group to 111.6 ml in the USS group (MD = -113.42, 95% CI [-142.05, -84.79], p<0.001). Results from RCTs subgroup were consistent with those from nRCTs subgroup. The weighted cumulative risk of POC accounted for 8.9% (0%-25%) and 12.9% (5.5%-45%) in the USS and conventional groups, respectively. Pooled estimated results from nRCTs (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.27, 1.06], p = 0.07) and RCTs (RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.44, 1.26], p = 0.27) showed no significant difference between the USS and control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes showed the improvements of the USS group over control group regarding the number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative hospitalization days, abdominal drainage volume and time for recovery of gastrointestinal functions.Compared with conventional electrosurgery, the USS is a safe and effective technique with more short-term advantages in open surgery for gastric cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4117513?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Xiao-Long Chen Xin-Zu Chen Zheng-Hao Lu Li Wang Kun Yang Jian-Kun Hu Bo Zhang Zhi-Xin Chen Jia-Ping Chen Zong-Guang Zhou Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_full | Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_short | Comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_sort | comparison of ultrasonic scalpel versus conventional techniques in open gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma patients a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4117513?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaolongchen comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xinzuchen comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhenghaolu comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liwang comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kunyang comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiankunhu comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bozhang comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhixinchen comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiapingchen comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zongguangzhou comparisonofultrasonicscalpelversusconventionaltechniquesinopengastrectomyforgastriccarcinomapatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |