The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects
Cultural heritage objects are affected by a wide range of factors causing their deterioration and decay over time such as ground deformations, changes in hydrographic conditions, vibrations or excess of moisture, which can cause scratches and cracks formation in the case of historic buildings. The e...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2915 |
| _version_ | 1797567345579786240 |
|---|---|
| author | Jakub Markiewicz Sławomir Łapiński Patryk Kot Aleksandra Tobiasz Magomed Muradov Joanna Nikel Andy Shaw Ahmed Al-Shamma’a |
| author_facet | Jakub Markiewicz Sławomir Łapiński Patryk Kot Aleksandra Tobiasz Magomed Muradov Joanna Nikel Andy Shaw Ahmed Al-Shamma’a |
| author_sort | Jakub Markiewicz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Cultural heritage objects are affected by a wide range of factors causing their deterioration and decay over time such as ground deformations, changes in hydrographic conditions, vibrations or excess of moisture, which can cause scratches and cracks formation in the case of historic buildings. The electromagnetic spectroscopy has been widely used for non-destructive structural health monitoring of concrete structures. However, the limitation of this technology is a lack of geolocalisation in the space for multispectral architectural documentation. The aim of this study is to examine different geolocalisation methods in order to determine the position of the sensor system, which will then allow to georeference the results of measurements performed by this device and apply corrections to the sensor response, which is a crucial element required for further data processing related to the object structure and its features. The classical surveying, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry methods were used in this investigation at three test sites. The methods were reviewed and investigated. The results indicated that TLS technique should be applied for simple structures and plain textures, while the SfM technique should be used for marble-based and other translucent or semi-translucent structures in order to achieve the highest accuracy for geolocalisation of the proposed sensor system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T19:40:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2632e8e534ee4e49986a9c5fec5eebd5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T19:40:25Z |
| publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-2632e8e534ee4e49986a9c5fec5eebd52023-11-20T01:14:39ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-05-012010291510.3390/s20102915The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental ObjectsJakub Markiewicz0Sławomir Łapiński1Patryk Kot2Aleksandra Tobiasz3Magomed Muradov4Joanna Nikel5Andy Shaw6Ahmed Al-Shamma’a7Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, PolandBuilt Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UKDocumentation and Digitalization Department, Museum of King Jan III’s Palace at Wilanów, ul. Stanisława Kostki Potockiego 10/16, 02-958 Warsaw, PolandBuilt Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UKDepartment of Material Culture History, University of Wrocław, Szewska 49, 50-137 Wroclaw, PolandBuilt Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UKCollage of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, UAECultural heritage objects are affected by a wide range of factors causing their deterioration and decay over time such as ground deformations, changes in hydrographic conditions, vibrations or excess of moisture, which can cause scratches and cracks formation in the case of historic buildings. The electromagnetic spectroscopy has been widely used for non-destructive structural health monitoring of concrete structures. However, the limitation of this technology is a lack of geolocalisation in the space for multispectral architectural documentation. The aim of this study is to examine different geolocalisation methods in order to determine the position of the sensor system, which will then allow to georeference the results of measurements performed by this device and apply corrections to the sensor response, which is a crucial element required for further data processing related to the object structure and its features. The classical surveying, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry methods were used in this investigation at three test sites. The methods were reviewed and investigated. The results indicated that TLS technique should be applied for simple structures and plain textures, while the SfM technique should be used for marble-based and other translucent or semi-translucent structures in order to achieve the highest accuracy for geolocalisation of the proposed sensor system.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2915cultural heritageelectromagnetic sensorgeolocalisationmultisensor platformnon-destructive techniquesphotogrammetry |
| spellingShingle | Jakub Markiewicz Sławomir Łapiński Patryk Kot Aleksandra Tobiasz Magomed Muradov Joanna Nikel Andy Shaw Ahmed Al-Shamma’a The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects Sensors cultural heritage electromagnetic sensor geolocalisation multisensor platform non-destructive techniques photogrammetry |
| title | The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects |
| title_full | The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects |
| title_fullStr | The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects |
| title_short | The Quality Assessment of Different Geolocalisation Methods for a Sensor System to Monitor Structural Health of Monumental Objects |
| title_sort | quality assessment of different geolocalisation methods for a sensor system to monitor structural health of monumental objects |
| topic | cultural heritage electromagnetic sensor geolocalisation multisensor platform non-destructive techniques photogrammetry |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2915 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jakubmarkiewicz thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT sławomirłapinski thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT patrykkot thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT aleksandratobiasz thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT magomedmuradov thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT joannanikel thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT andyshaw thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT ahmedalshammaa thequalityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT jakubmarkiewicz qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT sławomirłapinski qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT patrykkot qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT aleksandratobiasz qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT magomedmuradov qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT joannanikel qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT andyshaw qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects AT ahmedalshammaa qualityassessmentofdifferentgeolocalisationmethodsforasensorsystemtomonitorstructuralhealthofmonumentalobjects |