Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is a significant yield-limiting factor in soybean production in the Midwestern US. Several management practices are implemented to mitigate yield losses caused by SCN, including using SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors) fungicides...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo F. Rocha, Arjun Subedi, Mirian F. Pimentel, Jason P. Bond, Ahmad M. Fakhoury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1020167/full
_version_ 1797990775237115904
author Leonardo F. Rocha
Arjun Subedi
Mirian F. Pimentel
Jason P. Bond
Ahmad M. Fakhoury
author_facet Leonardo F. Rocha
Arjun Subedi
Mirian F. Pimentel
Jason P. Bond
Ahmad M. Fakhoury
author_sort Leonardo F. Rocha
collection DOAJ
description The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is a significant yield-limiting factor in soybean production in the Midwestern US. Several management practices are implemented to mitigate yield losses caused by SCN, including using SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors) fungicides delivered as seed treatments. A set of studies was conducted to evaluate the effect of two seed-applied succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI) compounds, fluopyram and pydiflumetofen, on SCN population densities, plant injury, and plant growth. Cyst counts in untreated control and pydiflumetofen treated plants were 3.44 and 3.59 times higher than fluopyram, respectively, while egg counts were 8.25 and 7.06 times higher in control and pydiflumetofen. Next-generation sequencing was later employed to identify transcriptomic shifts in gene expression profiles in fluopyram and pydiflumetofen -treated seedlings. RNA expression patterns of seed treatments clustered by sampling time (5 DAP vs. 10 DAP); therefore, downstream analysis was conducted by timepoint. At 5 DAP, 10,870 and 325 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified in fluopyram and pydiflumetofen, respectively. These same treatments generated 219 and 2 DEGs at 10 DAP. Multiple DEGs identified in soybean seedlings treated with fluopyram are linked to systemic resistance, suggesting a potential role of systemic resistance in the suppression of SCN by fluopyram, in addition to the known nematicidal activity. The non-target inhibition of soybean succinate dehydrogenase genes by fluopyram may be the origin of the phytotoxicity symptoms observed and potentially the source of the systemic resistance activation reported in the current study. This work helps to elucidate the mechanisms of suppression of SCN by fluopyram.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:41:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-263764968c414dffb340f31d4c14c822
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:41:45Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-263764968c414dffb340f31d4c14c8222022-12-22T04:34:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2022-10-011310.3389/fpls.2022.10201671020167Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybeanLeonardo F. RochaArjun SubediMirian F. PimentelJason P. BondAhmad M. FakhouryThe soybean cyst nematode (SCN) (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is a significant yield-limiting factor in soybean production in the Midwestern US. Several management practices are implemented to mitigate yield losses caused by SCN, including using SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors) fungicides delivered as seed treatments. A set of studies was conducted to evaluate the effect of two seed-applied succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI) compounds, fluopyram and pydiflumetofen, on SCN population densities, plant injury, and plant growth. Cyst counts in untreated control and pydiflumetofen treated plants were 3.44 and 3.59 times higher than fluopyram, respectively, while egg counts were 8.25 and 7.06 times higher in control and pydiflumetofen. Next-generation sequencing was later employed to identify transcriptomic shifts in gene expression profiles in fluopyram and pydiflumetofen -treated seedlings. RNA expression patterns of seed treatments clustered by sampling time (5 DAP vs. 10 DAP); therefore, downstream analysis was conducted by timepoint. At 5 DAP, 10,870 and 325 differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified in fluopyram and pydiflumetofen, respectively. These same treatments generated 219 and 2 DEGs at 10 DAP. Multiple DEGs identified in soybean seedlings treated with fluopyram are linked to systemic resistance, suggesting a potential role of systemic resistance in the suppression of SCN by fluopyram, in addition to the known nematicidal activity. The non-target inhibition of soybean succinate dehydrogenase genes by fluopyram may be the origin of the phytotoxicity symptoms observed and potentially the source of the systemic resistance activation reported in the current study. This work helps to elucidate the mechanisms of suppression of SCN by fluopyram.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1020167/fullGlycine maxplant-parasitic nematodesseed treatmentSDHI fungicidesRNA-Seqtranscriptomics
spellingShingle Leonardo F. Rocha
Arjun Subedi
Mirian F. Pimentel
Jason P. Bond
Ahmad M. Fakhoury
Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
Frontiers in Plant Science
Glycine max
plant-parasitic nematodes
seed treatment
SDHI fungicides
RNA-Seq
transcriptomics
title Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
title_full Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
title_fullStr Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
title_full_unstemmed Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
title_short Fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
title_sort fluopyram activates systemic resistance in soybean
topic Glycine max
plant-parasitic nematodes
seed treatment
SDHI fungicides
RNA-Seq
transcriptomics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1020167/full
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardofrocha fluopyramactivatessystemicresistanceinsoybean
AT arjunsubedi fluopyramactivatessystemicresistanceinsoybean
AT mirianfpimentel fluopyramactivatessystemicresistanceinsoybean
AT jasonpbond fluopyramactivatessystemicresistanceinsoybean
AT ahmadmfakhoury fluopyramactivatessystemicresistanceinsoybean