Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects
In Soviet historiography, subject to ideological dictates, the theme of the Union of Bessarabia with Romania, the role of the great personalities of the time, in the same line of the Prime Minister of România Alexandru Marghiloman, was distorted or neglected. The interest for the great event of Marc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moldova State University
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Dialogica: Revistă de Studii Culturale și Literatură |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialogica.asm.md/articolePDF/Supliment_1_22_petrencu.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811325827272409088 |
|---|---|
| author | Anatol PETRENCU |
| author_facet | Anatol PETRENCU |
| author_sort | Anatol PETRENCU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In Soviet historiography, subject to ideological dictates, the theme of the Union of Bessarabia with Romania, the role of the great personalities of the time, in the same line of the Prime Minister of România Alexandru Marghiloman, was distorted or neglected. The interest for the great event of March 27, 1918 in Bessarabia appears in the years of Restructuring promoted by Mikhail Gorbachev and especially after the proclamation of the State Independence of the Republic of Moldova. Bessarabian historians studied various issues related to the act of Union of 1918, published collections of documents, articles, monographs, organized scientific conferences dedicated to the Union of Bessarabia with Romania, personalities of that time. Among other politicians, historians also introduced A. Marghiloman.
Examination of these studies shows that the Prime Minister of Romania was biased, subjectively exposed as a reactionary person, in solidarity with the Bessarabian “boyars”, against the agrarian reform and the ownership of land by the peasants. The published documents, the memoirs of the politicians of the time, the press show that Alexandru Marghiloman promoted the interests of the Romanian Nation, took into account the wishes of different social strata, and today’s historians have the task of objective examination, “without hatred and bias” of the great personality Alexandru Marghiloman.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:40:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2637de0f41ab49bdaadfc5c9d9fad213 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2587-3695 1857-2537 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T14:40:22Z |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | Moldova State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Dialogica: Revistă de Studii Culturale și Literatură |
| spelling | doaj.art-2637de0f41ab49bdaadfc5c9d9fad2132022-12-22T02:42:55ZengMoldova State UniversityDialogica: Revistă de Studii Culturale și Literatură2587-36951857-25372022-04-01IVSupliment8387https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6513751Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspectsAnatol PETRENCU0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5449-1023USMIn Soviet historiography, subject to ideological dictates, the theme of the Union of Bessarabia with Romania, the role of the great personalities of the time, in the same line of the Prime Minister of România Alexandru Marghiloman, was distorted or neglected. The interest for the great event of March 27, 1918 in Bessarabia appears in the years of Restructuring promoted by Mikhail Gorbachev and especially after the proclamation of the State Independence of the Republic of Moldova. Bessarabian historians studied various issues related to the act of Union of 1918, published collections of documents, articles, monographs, organized scientific conferences dedicated to the Union of Bessarabia with Romania, personalities of that time. Among other politicians, historians also introduced A. Marghiloman. Examination of these studies shows that the Prime Minister of Romania was biased, subjectively exposed as a reactionary person, in solidarity with the Bessarabian “boyars”, against the agrarian reform and the ownership of land by the peasants. The published documents, the memoirs of the politicians of the time, the press show that Alexandru Marghiloman promoted the interests of the Romanian Nation, took into account the wishes of different social strata, and today’s historians have the task of objective examination, “without hatred and bias” of the great personality Alexandru Marghiloman. https://dialogica.asm.md/articolePDF/Supliment_1_22_petrencu.pdfalexandru marghilomanbessarabiathe unionromâniamemoryforgetfulness |
| spellingShingle | Anatol PETRENCU Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects Dialogica: Revistă de Studii Culturale și Literatură alexandru marghiloman bessarabia the union românia memory forgetfulness |
| title | Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects |
| title_full | Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects |
| title_fullStr | Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects |
| title_full_unstemmed | Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects |
| title_short | Alexandru Marghiloman and the Union of Bessarabia with Romania: historiographical aspects |
| title_sort | alexandru marghiloman and the union of bessarabia with romania historiographical aspects |
| topic | alexandru marghiloman bessarabia the union românia memory forgetfulness |
| url | https://dialogica.asm.md/articolePDF/Supliment_1_22_petrencu.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anatolpetrencu alexandrumarghilomanandtheunionofbessarabiawithromaniahistoriographicalaspects |