Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances

The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos, Panagiotis Kanarelis, Georgia Vagdouti, Ageliki Zavlanou, Iosif Sifakakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10074
_version_ 1797512835516858368
author Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
author_facet Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
author_sort Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>®</sup> and 26 with In-Ovation L<sup>®</sup> lingual brackets. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were used to assess the oral impacts, and speech samples were collected for speech evaluation by professionals. The levels of pain and painkiller intake were similar, increasing on the first day, and decreasing at 3 months. Subtle injuries on the lip and cheeks were initially reported in the aligner group. Lingual patients experienced more discomfort in swallowing and opening the mouth, tongue injuries and food residues, even at 3 months. The consonants “s” and “z” were mainly affected in both groups immediately after appliance insertion, but more often in the aligner group. These speech disturbances recovered in the following 3 months. In conclusion, both groups reported disturbances in quality-of-life measures; however, patients wearing lingual appliances experienced more disturbances, which persisted after three months. Speech disturbances were slightly more pronounced in the aligner group and recovered after three months.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:06:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c42761
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:06:16Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c427612023-11-22T20:27:23ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-10-0111211007410.3390/app112110074Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic AppliancesGerassimos G. Angelopoulos0Panagiotis Kanarelis1Georgia Vagdouti2Ageliki Zavlanou3Iosif Sifakakis4Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Thivon Str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, GreeceThe aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>®</sup> and 26 with In-Ovation L<sup>®</sup> lingual brackets. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were used to assess the oral impacts, and speech samples were collected for speech evaluation by professionals. The levels of pain and painkiller intake were similar, increasing on the first day, and decreasing at 3 months. Subtle injuries on the lip and cheeks were initially reported in the aligner group. Lingual patients experienced more discomfort in swallowing and opening the mouth, tongue injuries and food residues, even at 3 months. The consonants “s” and “z” were mainly affected in both groups immediately after appliance insertion, but more often in the aligner group. These speech disturbances recovered in the following 3 months. In conclusion, both groups reported disturbances in quality-of-life measures; however, patients wearing lingual appliances experienced more disturbances, which persisted after three months. Speech disturbances were slightly more pronounced in the aligner group and recovered after three months.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10074orthodonticlingualalignersquality of lifespeech
spellingShingle Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
Applied Sciences
orthodontic
lingual
aligners
quality of life
speech
title Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_full Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_fullStr Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_full_unstemmed Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_short Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_sort oral impacts of aligners versus fixed self ligating lingual orthodontic appliances
topic orthodontic
lingual
aligners
quality of life
speech
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10074
work_keys_str_mv AT gerassimosgangelopoulos oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT panagiotiskanarelis oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT georgiavagdouti oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT agelikizavlanou oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT iosifsifakakis oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances