Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types

This study examined differences in conflict management-related perceptions and behaviors as a function of Gold’s (1989) adult sibling types. Participants were 157 adults who reported on their relationship with a sibling by completing a series of self-report measures about themselves and the sibling...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary E. Donato, Megan R. Dillow
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Seismo Verlag 2017-10-01
Series:Studies in Communication Sciences
Subjects:
_version_ 1819070965360885760
author Mary E. Donato
Megan R. Dillow
author_facet Mary E. Donato
Megan R. Dillow
author_sort Mary E. Donato
collection DOAJ
description This study examined differences in conflict management-related perceptions and behaviors as a function of Gold’s (1989) adult sibling types. Participants were 157 adults who reported on their relationship with a sibling by completing a series of self-report measures about themselves and the sibling administered in paper-and-pencil format. Results revealed that adult siblings who classified their relationship as intimate perceived more positive sibling interpersonal power and parallel sibling influence, and were more likely to use prosocial conflict tactics with their sibling during conflicts. Conversely, adult siblings who characterized their relationship as apathetic/hostile were more likely to desire differentiation and to use dysfunctional conflict tactics during conflict with their sibling. In addition, across sibling types, perceptions of siblings’ power and influence predicted conflict tactic usage. This investigation extends available research by demonstrating destructive outcomes associated with the apathetic/hostile adult sibling type (e.g., increased use of violence as a conflict tactic). Further, across adult sibling types, this study provides insight into why emerging adult siblings use both constructive and destructive tactics during conflict with each other.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:14:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2651aec56cfc4acca4858738da17082f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-4896
2296-4150
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:14:19Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Seismo Verlag
record_format Article
series Studies in Communication Sciences
spelling doaj.art-2651aec56cfc4acca4858738da17082f2022-12-21T18:56:19ZdeuSeismo VerlagStudies in Communication Sciences1424-48962296-41502017-10-011714356https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2017.01.005Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling typesMary E. Donato0Megan R. Dillow1Buena Vista University, Department of Communication StudiesWest Virginia University, Department of Communication StudiesThis study examined differences in conflict management-related perceptions and behaviors as a function of Gold’s (1989) adult sibling types. Participants were 157 adults who reported on their relationship with a sibling by completing a series of self-report measures about themselves and the sibling administered in paper-and-pencil format. Results revealed that adult siblings who classified their relationship as intimate perceived more positive sibling interpersonal power and parallel sibling influence, and were more likely to use prosocial conflict tactics with their sibling during conflicts. Conversely, adult siblings who characterized their relationship as apathetic/hostile were more likely to desire differentiation and to use dysfunctional conflict tactics during conflict with their sibling. In addition, across sibling types, perceptions of siblings’ power and influence predicted conflict tactic usage. This investigation extends available research by demonstrating destructive outcomes associated with the apathetic/hostile adult sibling type (e.g., increased use of violence as a conflict tactic). Further, across adult sibling types, this study provides insight into why emerging adult siblings use both constructive and destructive tactics during conflict with each other.adult sibling typesconflict managementinterpersonal powersibling influenceconflict tactics
spellingShingle Mary E. Donato
Megan R. Dillow
Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
Studies in Communication Sciences
adult sibling types
conflict management
interpersonal power
sibling influence
conflict tactics
title Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
title_full Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
title_fullStr Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
title_full_unstemmed Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
title_short Conflict management in adult sibling relationships: Differences in interpersonal power, sibling influence, and conflict tactic use among sibling types
title_sort conflict management in adult sibling relationships differences in interpersonal power sibling influence and conflict tactic use among sibling types
topic adult sibling types
conflict management
interpersonal power
sibling influence
conflict tactics
work_keys_str_mv AT maryedonato conflictmanagementinadultsiblingrelationshipsdifferencesininterpersonalpowersiblinginfluenceandconflicttacticuseamongsiblingtypes
AT meganrdillow conflictmanagementinadultsiblingrelationshipsdifferencesininterpersonalpowersiblinginfluenceandconflicttacticuseamongsiblingtypes