Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups
Objective. To analyze feasibility and safety of C1, C2 fixation for craniocervical stabilization in patients of different age groups. Material and Methods. Study design is a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis. Level of evidence – II. The study was based on the diagnosis and treatment data of...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | Хирургия позвоночника |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1484/1458 |
| _version_ | 1797760605159948288 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandr V. Gubin Aleksandr V. Burtsev Sergey O. Ryabykh Vladimir S. Klimov Aleksey V. Evsyukov Denis S. Ivliev |
| author_facet | Alexandr V. Gubin Aleksandr V. Burtsev Sergey O. Ryabykh Vladimir S. Klimov Aleksey V. Evsyukov Denis S. Ivliev |
| author_sort | Alexandr V. Gubin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. To analyze feasibility and safety of C1, C2 fixation for craniocervical stabilization in patients of different age groups.
Material and Methods. Study design is a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis. Level of evidence – II. The study was based on the diagnosis and treatment data of 43 patients aged 5–74 years who underwent C1, C2 screw fixation.
Results. In most cases, atlantoaxial instability was due to traumatic injuries. Screws were implanted in C1 in 81 cases, and in C2 in 80.
Postoperative MSCT data were evaluated in 41 patients. The position of the screws in C1 was defined as ideal in 63,0 % of cases, in the
remaining cases there were malpositions, with 6 screws having double malpositions. Out of 80 screws inserted in C2, 64 were implanted
transpedicularly. In 59.5 % of cases, a good position was revealed; in other cases different malpositions were noted. In none of the cases
neurovascular damage or clinical manifestation occurred.
Conclusion. Analysis of screw fixation of C1, C2 showed that this technique is feasible in patients of different age groups. Duration of surgery and blood loss did not go beyond the conventional values. Postoperative malpositions are not accompanied by neurological disorders,
which allows to consider this fixation quite safe. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:01:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-265d6e7f40d34efe9ee82d73a0905c9d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1810-8997 2313-1497 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:01:00Z |
| publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Хирургия позвоночника |
| spelling | doaj.art-265d6e7f40d34efe9ee82d73a0905c9d2023-08-02T06:38:13ZengMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"Хирургия позвоночника1810-89972313-14972018-09-0115361210.14531/ss2018.3.6-12Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groupsAlexandr V. Gubin0Aleksandr V. Burtsev1Sergey O. Ryabykh2Vladimir S. Klimov3Aleksey V. Evsyukov4Denis S. Ivliev5Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, RussiaRussian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, RussiaRussian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, RussiaFederal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk, RussiaFederal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk, RussiaUral Clinical and Rehabilitation Centre, Nizhny Tagil, RussiaObjective. To analyze feasibility and safety of C1, C2 fixation for craniocervical stabilization in patients of different age groups. Material and Methods. Study design is a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis. Level of evidence – II. The study was based on the diagnosis and treatment data of 43 patients aged 5–74 years who underwent C1, C2 screw fixation. Results. In most cases, atlantoaxial instability was due to traumatic injuries. Screws were implanted in C1 in 81 cases, and in C2 in 80. Postoperative MSCT data were evaluated in 41 patients. The position of the screws in C1 was defined as ideal in 63,0 % of cases, in the remaining cases there were malpositions, with 6 screws having double malpositions. Out of 80 screws inserted in C2, 64 were implanted transpedicularly. In 59.5 % of cases, a good position was revealed; in other cases different malpositions were noted. In none of the cases neurovascular damage or clinical manifestation occurred. Conclusion. Analysis of screw fixation of C1, C2 showed that this technique is feasible in patients of different age groups. Duration of surgery and blood loss did not go beyond the conventional values. Postoperative malpositions are not accompanied by neurological disorders, which allows to consider this fixation quite safe.https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1484/1458atlantoaxial instabilityscrew fixationc1c2 |
| spellingShingle | Alexandr V. Gubin Aleksandr V. Burtsev Sergey O. Ryabykh Vladimir S. Klimov Aleksey V. Evsyukov Denis S. Ivliev Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups Хирургия позвоночника atlantoaxial instability screw fixation c1 c2 |
| title | Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| title_full | Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| title_fullStr | Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| title_short | Analysis of C1, C2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| title_sort | analysis of c1 c2 screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in patients of different age groups |
| topic | atlantoaxial instability screw fixation c1 c2 |
| url | https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1484/1458 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandrvgubin analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups AT aleksandrvburtsev analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups AT sergeyoryabykh analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups AT vladimirsklimov analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups AT alekseyvevsyukov analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups AT denissivliev analysisofc1c2screwfixationforatlantoaxialinstabilityinpatientsofdifferentagegroups |