Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Live animal imaging is becoming an increasingly common technique for accurate and quantitative assessment of tumor burden over time. Bioluminescence imaging systems rely on a bioluminescent signal from tumor cells, typically generated from expression of the firef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasko John EJ, Ng Cynthia, Bailey Charles G, Tiffen Jessamy C, Holst Jeff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:Molecular Cancer
Online Access:http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/299
_version_ 1818826783794921472
author Rasko John EJ
Ng Cynthia
Bailey Charles G
Tiffen Jessamy C
Holst Jeff
author_facet Rasko John EJ
Ng Cynthia
Bailey Charles G
Tiffen Jessamy C
Holst Jeff
author_sort Rasko John EJ
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Live animal imaging is becoming an increasingly common technique for accurate and quantitative assessment of tumor burden over time. Bioluminescence imaging systems rely on a bioluminescent signal from tumor cells, typically generated from expression of the firefly luciferase gene. However, previous reports have suggested that either a high level of luciferase or the resultant light reaction produced upon addition of D-luciferin substrate can have a negative influence on tumor cell growth. To address this issue, we designed an expression vector that allows simultaneous fluorescence and luminescence imaging. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), we generated clonal cell populations from a human breast cancer (MCF-7) and a mouse melanoma (B16-F10) cell line that stably expressed different levels of luciferase. We then compared the growth capabilities of these clones <it>in vitro </it>by MTT proliferation assay and <it>in vivo </it>by bioluminescence imaging of tumor growth in live mice. Surprisingly, we found that neither the amount of luciferase nor biophotonic activity was sufficient to inhibit tumor cell growth, <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>. These results suggest that luciferase toxicity is not a necessary consideration when designing bioluminescence experiments, and therefore our approach can be used to rapidly generate high levels of luciferase expression for sensitive imaging experiments.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:33:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-266c1c12f4c342d89fd490d887c50bc1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-4598
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:33:09Z
publishDate 2010-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Molecular Cancer
spelling doaj.art-266c1c12f4c342d89fd490d887c50bc12022-12-21T20:45:00ZengBMCMolecular Cancer1476-45982010-11-019129910.1186/1476-4598-9-299Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>Rasko John EJNg CynthiaBailey Charles GTiffen Jessamy CHolst Jeff<p>Abstract</p> <p>Live animal imaging is becoming an increasingly common technique for accurate and quantitative assessment of tumor burden over time. Bioluminescence imaging systems rely on a bioluminescent signal from tumor cells, typically generated from expression of the firefly luciferase gene. However, previous reports have suggested that either a high level of luciferase or the resultant light reaction produced upon addition of D-luciferin substrate can have a negative influence on tumor cell growth. To address this issue, we designed an expression vector that allows simultaneous fluorescence and luminescence imaging. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), we generated clonal cell populations from a human breast cancer (MCF-7) and a mouse melanoma (B16-F10) cell line that stably expressed different levels of luciferase. We then compared the growth capabilities of these clones <it>in vitro </it>by MTT proliferation assay and <it>in vivo </it>by bioluminescence imaging of tumor growth in live mice. Surprisingly, we found that neither the amount of luciferase nor biophotonic activity was sufficient to inhibit tumor cell growth, <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>. These results suggest that luciferase toxicity is not a necessary consideration when designing bioluminescence experiments, and therefore our approach can be used to rapidly generate high levels of luciferase expression for sensitive imaging experiments.</p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/299
spellingShingle Rasko John EJ
Ng Cynthia
Bailey Charles G
Tiffen Jessamy C
Holst Jeff
Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
Molecular Cancer
title Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
title_full Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
title_fullStr Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
title_full_unstemmed Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
title_short Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth <it>in vitro </it>or <it>in vivo</it>
title_sort luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth it in vitro it or it in vivo it
url http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/299
work_keys_str_mv AT raskojohnej luciferaseexpressionandbioluminescencedoesnotaffecttumorcellgrowthitinvitroitoritinvivoit
AT ngcynthia luciferaseexpressionandbioluminescencedoesnotaffecttumorcellgrowthitinvitroitoritinvivoit
AT baileycharlesg luciferaseexpressionandbioluminescencedoesnotaffecttumorcellgrowthitinvitroitoritinvivoit
AT tiffenjessamyc luciferaseexpressionandbioluminescencedoesnotaffecttumorcellgrowthitinvitroitoritinvivoit
AT holstjeff luciferaseexpressionandbioluminescencedoesnotaffecttumorcellgrowthitinvitroitoritinvivoit