Is globalization good for your health?

Four points are made about globalization and health. First, economic integration is a powerful force for raising the incomes of poor countries. In the past 20 years several large developing countries have opened up to trade and investment, and they are growing well - faster than the rich countries....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Dollar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The World Health Organization
Series:Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900007&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797281933514768384
author David Dollar
author_facet David Dollar
author_sort David Dollar
collection DOAJ
description Four points are made about globalization and health. First, economic integration is a powerful force for raising the incomes of poor countries. In the past 20 years several large developing countries have opened up to trade and investment, and they are growing well - faster than the rich countries. Second, there is no tendency for income inequality to increase in countries that open up. The higher growth that accompanies globalization in developing countries generally benefits poor people. Since there is a large literature linking income of the poor to health status, we can be reasonably confident that globalization has indirect positive effects on nutrition, infant mortality and other health issues related to income. Third, economic integration can obviously have adverse health effects as well: the transmission of AIDS through migration and travel is a dramatic recent example. However, both relatively closed and relatively open developing countries have severe AIDS problems. The practical solution lies in health policies, not in policies on economic integration. Likewise, free trade in tobacco will lead to increased smoking unless health-motivated disincentives are put in place. Global integration requires supporting institutions and policies. Fourth, the international architecture can be improved so that it is more beneficial to poor countries. For example, with regard to intellectual property rights, it may be practical for pharmaceutical innovators to choose to have intellectual property rights in either rich country markets or poor country ones, but not both. In this way incentives could be strong for research on diseases in both rich and poor countries.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:04:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2676366d09d94d7db8a5561d73bfb041
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:04:37Z
publisher The World Health Organization
record_format Article
series Bulletin of the World Health Organization
spelling doaj.art-2676366d09d94d7db8a5561d73bfb0412024-03-03T02:44:50ZengThe World Health OrganizationBulletin of the World Health Organization0042-968679982783310.1590/S0042-96862001000900007S0042-96862001000900007Is globalization good for your health?David Dollar0The World BankFour points are made about globalization and health. First, economic integration is a powerful force for raising the incomes of poor countries. In the past 20 years several large developing countries have opened up to trade and investment, and they are growing well - faster than the rich countries. Second, there is no tendency for income inequality to increase in countries that open up. The higher growth that accompanies globalization in developing countries generally benefits poor people. Since there is a large literature linking income of the poor to health status, we can be reasonably confident that globalization has indirect positive effects on nutrition, infant mortality and other health issues related to income. Third, economic integration can obviously have adverse health effects as well: the transmission of AIDS through migration and travel is a dramatic recent example. However, both relatively closed and relatively open developing countries have severe AIDS problems. The practical solution lies in health policies, not in policies on economic integration. Likewise, free trade in tobacco will lead to increased smoking unless health-motivated disincentives are put in place. Global integration requires supporting institutions and policies. Fourth, the international architecture can be improved so that it is more beneficial to poor countries. For example, with regard to intellectual property rights, it may be practical for pharmaceutical innovators to choose to have intellectual property rights in either rich country markets or poor country ones, but not both. In this way incentives could be strong for research on diseases in both rich and poor countries.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900007&lng=en&tlng=enCommerceInternational cooperationIncomeEconomic developmentPublic healthRisk factorsHealth policyAcquired immunodeficiency syndromeAcquired immunodeficiency syndromePharmaceutical preparationsPatentsDeveloping countries
spellingShingle David Dollar
Is globalization good for your health?
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Commerce
International cooperation
Income
Economic development
Public health
Risk factors
Health policy
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Pharmaceutical preparations
Patents
Developing countries
title Is globalization good for your health?
title_full Is globalization good for your health?
title_fullStr Is globalization good for your health?
title_full_unstemmed Is globalization good for your health?
title_short Is globalization good for your health?
title_sort is globalization good for your health
topic Commerce
International cooperation
Income
Economic development
Public health
Risk factors
Health policy
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Pharmaceutical preparations
Patents
Developing countries
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900007&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT daviddollar isglobalizationgoodforyourhealth