Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.

An important mechanism for learning speech sounds in the first year of life is ‘distributional learning’, i.e., learning by simply listening to the frequency distributions of the speech sounds in the environment. In the lab, fast distributional learning has been reported for infants in the second ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karin eWanrooij, Paul eBoersma, Titia eVan Zuijen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00077/full
_version_ 1818606469151457280
author Karin eWanrooij
Paul eBoersma
Titia eVan Zuijen
author_facet Karin eWanrooij
Paul eBoersma
Titia eVan Zuijen
author_sort Karin eWanrooij
collection DOAJ
description An important mechanism for learning speech sounds in the first year of life is ‘distributional learning’, i.e., learning by simply listening to the frequency distributions of the speech sounds in the environment. In the lab, fast distributional learning has been reported for infants in the second half of the first year; the present study examined whether it can also be demonstrated at a much younger age, long before the onset of language-specific speech perception (which roughly emerges between 6 and 12 months). To investigate this, Dutch infants aged 2 to 3 months were presented with either a unimodal or a bimodal vowel distribution based on the English /æ/~/ε/ contrast, for only twelve minutes. Subsequently, mismatch responses (MMRs) were measured in an oddball paradigm, where one half of the infants in each group heard a representative [æ] as the standard and a representative [ε] as the deviant, and the other half heard the same reversed. The results (from the combined MMRs during wakefulness and active sleep) disclosed a larger MMR, implying better discrimination of [æ] and [ε], for bimodally than unimodally trained infants, thus extending an effect of distributional training found in previous behavioral research to a much younger age when speech perception is still universal rather than language-specific, and to a new method (ERP). Moreover, the analysis revealed a robust interaction between the distribution (unimodal vs. bimodal) and the identity of the standard stimulus ([æ] vs. [ε]), which provides evidence for an interplay between a perceptual asymmetry and distributional learning. The outcomes show that distributional learning can affect vowel perception already in the first months of life.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:11:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-267c472930e347009c5bd166afa9c5a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:11:21Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-267c472930e347009c5bd166afa9c5a82022-12-21T22:28:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-02-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0007774641Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.Karin eWanrooij0Paul eBoersma1Titia eVan Zuijen2University of AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamAn important mechanism for learning speech sounds in the first year of life is ‘distributional learning’, i.e., learning by simply listening to the frequency distributions of the speech sounds in the environment. In the lab, fast distributional learning has been reported for infants in the second half of the first year; the present study examined whether it can also be demonstrated at a much younger age, long before the onset of language-specific speech perception (which roughly emerges between 6 and 12 months). To investigate this, Dutch infants aged 2 to 3 months were presented with either a unimodal or a bimodal vowel distribution based on the English /æ/~/ε/ contrast, for only twelve minutes. Subsequently, mismatch responses (MMRs) were measured in an oddball paradigm, where one half of the infants in each group heard a representative [æ] as the standard and a representative [ε] as the deviant, and the other half heard the same reversed. The results (from the combined MMRs during wakefulness and active sleep) disclosed a larger MMR, implying better discrimination of [æ] and [ε], for bimodally than unimodally trained infants, thus extending an effect of distributional training found in previous behavioral research to a much younger age when speech perception is still universal rather than language-specific, and to a new method (ERP). Moreover, the analysis revealed a robust interaction between the distribution (unimodal vs. bimodal) and the identity of the standard stimulus ([æ] vs. [ε]), which provides evidence for an interplay between a perceptual asymmetry and distributional learning. The outcomes show that distributional learning can affect vowel perception already in the first months of life.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00077/fullSpeech PerceptionERPlanguage acquisitioncategory learningDistributional learninginfant MMR (mismatch response)
spellingShingle Karin eWanrooij
Paul eBoersma
Titia eVan Zuijen
Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
Frontiers in Psychology
Speech Perception
ERP
language acquisition
category learning
Distributional learning
infant MMR (mismatch response)
title Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
title_full Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
title_fullStr Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
title_full_unstemmed Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
title_short Fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2-to-3-month old infants: an ERP study.
title_sort fast phonetic learning occurs already in 2 to 3 month old infants an erp study
topic Speech Perception
ERP
language acquisition
category learning
Distributional learning
infant MMR (mismatch response)
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00077/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karinewanrooij fastphoneticlearningoccursalreadyin2to3montholdinfantsanerpstudy
AT pauleboersma fastphoneticlearningoccursalreadyin2to3montholdinfantsanerpstudy
AT titiaevanzuijen fastphoneticlearningoccursalreadyin2to3montholdinfantsanerpstudy