The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)

Spiny lobsters have a range of complex chemical communication pathways that contribute to feeding behaviour. Feed intake is modulated by feed availability and feed characteristics, such as attractiveness and palatability, with behavioural factors, such as social competition and circadian rhythm, pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk, Quinn P. Fitzgibbon, Basseer M. Codabaccus, Andrew J. Trotter, Dean R. Giosio, Chris G. Carter, Gregory G. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/17/2241
_version_ 1797496699237695488
author Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk
Quinn P. Fitzgibbon
Basseer M. Codabaccus
Andrew J. Trotter
Dean R. Giosio
Chris G. Carter
Gregory G. Smith
author_facet Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk
Quinn P. Fitzgibbon
Basseer M. Codabaccus
Andrew J. Trotter
Dean R. Giosio
Chris G. Carter
Gregory G. Smith
author_sort Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk
collection DOAJ
description Spiny lobsters have a range of complex chemical communication pathways that contribute to feeding behaviour. Feed intake is modulated by feed availability and feed characteristics, such as attractiveness and palatability, with behavioural factors, such as social competition and circadian rhythm, providing an extra layer of complexity. In this study, we investigated the effect of feed frequency on survival and growth of early-stage (instar 2–6) juvenile <i>Palunirus ornatus</i>. In addition, we investigated the interactive effect of feed frequency and circadian rhythm on lobster feed response. Lobsters were fed a set ration at a frequency of either one, two, four, eight, sixteen or thirty-two times per day over 49 days. The effect of feed frequency on growth and survival was determined. Circadian feeding activity under these feeding treatments was assessed by time-lapse photography. Increased feed frequency from one to sixteen feeds daily improved growth by increasing apparent feed intake (AFI) and feed attraction, as confirmed by the increased presence of lobsters in the feeding area. The rapid leaching of feed attractant, particularly free amino acid, suggests a beneficial effect of multiple feeding frequencies on feed intake and growth. However, more than sixteen feeds per day resulted in decreased feed intake and a subsequent reduction in growth. The decrease in feed intake is thought to be associated with saturation of the culture environment with attractants, resulting in a reduced behavioural response to feed supplies. This may indicate the need for depletion of attractants to retrigger a feeding response. As lobsters were grown communally, faster growth at sixteen rations per day was also coupled with increased cannibalism, likely driven by increased vulnerability with the occurrence of more frequent ecdysis events. Whereas circadian rhythm indicated more activity at night, an interaction between daytime activity and feed frequency was not observed.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:07:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-268c69663d5e4e009c6fa6c411c029d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:07:19Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-268c69663d5e4e009c6fa6c411c029d72023-11-23T12:37:36ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-08-011217224110.3390/ani12172241The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk0Quinn P. Fitzgibbon1Basseer M. Codabaccus2Andrew J. Trotter3Dean R. Giosio4Chris G. Carter5Gregory G. Smith6Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaInstitute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, TAS 7001, AustraliaSpiny lobsters have a range of complex chemical communication pathways that contribute to feeding behaviour. Feed intake is modulated by feed availability and feed characteristics, such as attractiveness and palatability, with behavioural factors, such as social competition and circadian rhythm, providing an extra layer of complexity. In this study, we investigated the effect of feed frequency on survival and growth of early-stage (instar 2–6) juvenile <i>Palunirus ornatus</i>. In addition, we investigated the interactive effect of feed frequency and circadian rhythm on lobster feed response. Lobsters were fed a set ration at a frequency of either one, two, four, eight, sixteen or thirty-two times per day over 49 days. The effect of feed frequency on growth and survival was determined. Circadian feeding activity under these feeding treatments was assessed by time-lapse photography. Increased feed frequency from one to sixteen feeds daily improved growth by increasing apparent feed intake (AFI) and feed attraction, as confirmed by the increased presence of lobsters in the feeding area. The rapid leaching of feed attractant, particularly free amino acid, suggests a beneficial effect of multiple feeding frequencies on feed intake and growth. However, more than sixteen feeds per day resulted in decreased feed intake and a subsequent reduction in growth. The decrease in feed intake is thought to be associated with saturation of the culture environment with attractants, resulting in a reduced behavioural response to feed supplies. This may indicate the need for depletion of attractants to retrigger a feeding response. As lobsters were grown communally, faster growth at sixteen rations per day was also coupled with increased cannibalism, likely driven by increased vulnerability with the occurrence of more frequent ecdysis events. Whereas circadian rhythm indicated more activity at night, an interaction between daytime activity and feed frequency was not observed.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/17/2241aquaculturecrustaceanbehaviourcannibalismnutritiontropical rock lobster
spellingShingle Katarzyna Kropielnicka-Kruk
Quinn P. Fitzgibbon
Basseer M. Codabaccus
Andrew J. Trotter
Dean R. Giosio
Chris G. Carter
Gregory G. Smith
The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
Animals
aquaculture
crustacean
behaviour
cannibalism
nutrition
tropical rock lobster
title The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
title_full The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
title_fullStr The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
title_short The Effect of Feed Frequency on Growth, Survival and Behaviour of Juvenile Spiny Lobster (<i>Panulirus ornatus</i>)
title_sort effect of feed frequency on growth survival and behaviour of juvenile spiny lobster i panulirus ornatus i
topic aquaculture
crustacean
behaviour
cannibalism
nutrition
tropical rock lobster
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/17/2241
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynakropielnickakruk theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT quinnpfitzgibbon theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT basseermcodabaccus theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT andrewjtrotter theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT deanrgiosio theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT chrisgcarter theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT gregorygsmith theeffectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT katarzynakropielnickakruk effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT quinnpfitzgibbon effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT basseermcodabaccus effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT andrewjtrotter effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT deanrgiosio effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT chrisgcarter effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi
AT gregorygsmith effectoffeedfrequencyongrowthsurvivalandbehaviourofjuvenilespinylobsteripanulirusornatusi