Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives

Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of glutamic acid–glutamates (E 620–625) when used as food additives. Glutamate is absorbed in the intestine and it is presystemically metabolised in the gut wall....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), Alicja Mortensen, Fernando Aguilar, Riccardo Crebelli, Alessandro Di Domenico, Birgit Dusemund, Maria Jose Frutos, Pierre Galtier, David Gott, Ursula Gundert‐Remy, Jean‐Charles Leblanc, Oliver Lindtner, Peter Moldeus, Pasquale Mosesso, Dominique Parent‐Massin, Agneta Oskarsson, Ivan Stankovic, Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen, Rudolf Antonius Woutersen, Matthew Wright, Maged Younes, Polly Boon, Dimitrios Chrysafidis, Rainer Gürtler, Paul Tobback, Andrea Altieri, Ana Maria Rincon, Claude Lambré
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4910
_version_ 1819364519932067840
author EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Alicja Mortensen
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Dominique Parent‐Massin
Agneta Oskarsson
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen
Matthew Wright
Maged Younes
Polly Boon
Dimitrios Chrysafidis
Rainer Gürtler
Paul Tobback
Andrea Altieri
Ana Maria Rincon
Claude Lambré
author_facet EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Alicja Mortensen
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Dominique Parent‐Massin
Agneta Oskarsson
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen
Matthew Wright
Maged Younes
Polly Boon
Dimitrios Chrysafidis
Rainer Gürtler
Paul Tobback
Andrea Altieri
Ana Maria Rincon
Claude Lambré
author_sort EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of glutamic acid–glutamates (E 620–625) when used as food additives. Glutamate is absorbed in the intestine and it is presystemically metabolised in the gut wall. No adverse effects were observed in the available short‐term, subchronic, chronic, reproductive and developmental studies. The only effect observed was increased kidney weight and increased spleen weight; however, the increase in organ weight was not accompanied by adverse histopathological findings and, therefore, the increase in organ weight was not considered as an adverse effect. The Panel considered that glutamic acid–glutamates (E 620–625) did not raise concern with regards to genotoxicity. From a neurodevelopmental toxicity study, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 3,200 mg monosodium glutamate/kg body weight (bw) per day could be identified. The Panel assessed the suitability of human data to be used for the derivation of a health‐based guidance value. Although effects on humans were identified human data were not suitable due to the lack of dose–response data from which a dose without effect could be identified. Based on the NOAEL of 3,200 mg monosodium glutamate/kg bw per day from the neurodevelopmental toxicity study and applying the default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel derived a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg bw per day, expressed as glutamic acid, for glutamic acid and glutamates (E 620–625). The Panel noted that the exposure to glutamic acid and glutamates (E 620–625) exceeded not only the proposed ADI, but also doses associated with adverse effects in humans for some population groups.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T23:00:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-268f8ecb4b4043bfad2ef1e36ca0f383
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T23:00:14Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-268f8ecb4b4043bfad2ef1e36ca0f3832022-12-21T16:35:09ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-07-01157n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4910Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additivesEFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)Alicja MortensenFernando AguilarRiccardo CrebelliAlessandro Di DomenicoBirgit DusemundMaria Jose FrutosPierre GaltierDavid GottUrsula Gundert‐RemyJean‐Charles LeblancOliver LindtnerPeter MoldeusPasquale MosessoDominique Parent‐MassinAgneta OskarssonIvan StankovicIne Waalkens‐BerendsenRudolf Antonius WoutersenMatthew WrightMaged YounesPolly BoonDimitrios ChrysafidisRainer GürtlerPaul TobbackAndrea AltieriAna Maria RinconClaude LambréAbstract The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of glutamic acid–glutamates (E 620–625) when used as food additives. Glutamate is absorbed in the intestine and it is presystemically metabolised in the gut wall. No adverse effects were observed in the available short‐term, subchronic, chronic, reproductive and developmental studies. The only effect observed was increased kidney weight and increased spleen weight; however, the increase in organ weight was not accompanied by adverse histopathological findings and, therefore, the increase in organ weight was not considered as an adverse effect. The Panel considered that glutamic acid–glutamates (E 620–625) did not raise concern with regards to genotoxicity. From a neurodevelopmental toxicity study, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 3,200 mg monosodium glutamate/kg body weight (bw) per day could be identified. The Panel assessed the suitability of human data to be used for the derivation of a health‐based guidance value. Although effects on humans were identified human data were not suitable due to the lack of dose–response data from which a dose without effect could be identified. Based on the NOAEL of 3,200 mg monosodium glutamate/kg bw per day from the neurodevelopmental toxicity study and applying the default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel derived a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg bw per day, expressed as glutamic acid, for glutamic acid and glutamates (E 620–625). The Panel noted that the exposure to glutamic acid and glutamates (E 620–625) exceeded not only the proposed ADI, but also doses associated with adverse effects in humans for some population groups.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4910glutamic acidE 620sodium glutamateE 621potassium glutamateE 622
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS)
Alicja Mortensen
Fernando Aguilar
Riccardo Crebelli
Alessandro Di Domenico
Birgit Dusemund
Maria Jose Frutos
Pierre Galtier
David Gott
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Peter Moldeus
Pasquale Mosesso
Dominique Parent‐Massin
Agneta Oskarsson
Ivan Stankovic
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Rudolf Antonius Woutersen
Matthew Wright
Maged Younes
Polly Boon
Dimitrios Chrysafidis
Rainer Gürtler
Paul Tobback
Andrea Altieri
Ana Maria Rincon
Claude Lambré
Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
EFSA Journal
glutamic acid
E 620
sodium glutamate
E 621
potassium glutamate
E 622
title Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
title_full Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
title_short Re‐evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E 622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624) and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives
title_sort re evaluation of glutamic acid e 620 sodium glutamate e 621 potassium glutamate e 622 calcium glutamate e 623 ammonium glutamate e 624 and magnesium glutamate e 625 as food additives
topic glutamic acid
E 620
sodium glutamate
E 621
potassium glutamate
E 622
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4910
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonfoodadditivesandnutrientsourcesaddedtofoodans reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT alicjamortensen reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT fernandoaguilar reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT riccardocrebelli reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT alessandrodidomenico reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT birgitdusemund reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT mariajosefrutos reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT pierregaltier reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT davidgott reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT ursulagundertremy reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT jeancharlesleblanc reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT oliverlindtner reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT petermoldeus reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT pasqualemosesso reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT dominiqueparentmassin reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT agnetaoskarsson reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT ivanstankovic reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT inewaalkensberendsen reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT rudolfantoniuswoutersen reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT matthewwright reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT magedyounes reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT pollyboon reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT dimitrioschrysafidis reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT rainergurtler reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT paultobback reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT andreaaltieri reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT anamariarincon reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives
AT claudelambre reevaluationofglutamicacide620sodiumglutamatee621potassiumglutamatee622calciumglutamatee623ammoniumglutamatee624andmagnesiumglutamatee625asfoodadditives