The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)

A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the separate opinions in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (n=106, from November 1998 until September 2006) reveals the following patterns: a) judges elected in respect of the new member States of Central and Eastern Europe deliver sig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fred J. Bruinsma
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ancilla Iuris 2008-06-01
Series:Ancilla Iuris
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.anci.ch/doku.php?id=beitrag:bruinsma
_version_ 1828825390064336896
author Fred J. Bruinsma
author_facet Fred J. Bruinsma
author_sort Fred J. Bruinsma
collection DOAJ
description A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the separate opinions in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (n=106, from November 1998 until September 2006) reveals the following patterns: a) judges elected in respect of the new member States of Central and Eastern Europe deliver significantly less separate opinions than judges elected in respect of the old member States; b) national bias in the sense that the judges take a more benevolent position when their home country is the respondent State does in fact occur, and more so among ad hoc judges than among elected judges; and c) the lawyer‐statesmanʹs perspective seems to prevail in the majority judgment while human rights activism finds an outlet in separate opinions. Interviews with (19) judges enrich these data with insights into the social and institutional context of judicial decision making in the Grand Chamber.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:16:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-268ff6ea92e74315942c9e16956a573a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-8610
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:16:16Z
publishDate 2008-06-01
publisher Ancilla Iuris
record_format Article
series Ancilla Iuris
spelling doaj.art-268ff6ea92e74315942c9e16956a573a2022-12-22T00:21:54ZdeuAncilla IurisAncilla Iuris1661-86102008-06-0133243The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)Fred J. BruinsmaA quantitative and qualitative analysis of the separate opinions in the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (n=106, from November 1998 until September 2006) reveals the following patterns: a) judges elected in respect of the new member States of Central and Eastern Europe deliver significantly less separate opinions than judges elected in respect of the old member States; b) national bias in the sense that the judges take a more benevolent position when their home country is the respondent State does in fact occur, and more so among ad hoc judges than among elected judges; and c) the lawyer‐statesmanʹs perspective seems to prevail in the majority judgment while human rights activism finds an outlet in separate opinions. Interviews with (19) judges enrich these data with insights into the social and institutional context of judicial decision making in the Grand Chamber.http://www.anci.ch/doku.php?id=beitrag:bruinsmaLawSociologyEuropeEuropean LawHuman RightsECHR
spellingShingle Fred J. Bruinsma
The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
Ancilla Iuris
Law
Sociology
Europe
European Law
Human Rights
ECHR
title The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
title_full The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
title_fullStr The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
title_full_unstemmed The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
title_short The Room at the Top: Separate Opinions in the Grand Chambers of the ECHR (1998‐2006)
title_sort room at the top separate opinions in the grand chambers of the echr 1998 2006
topic Law
Sociology
Europe
European Law
Human Rights
ECHR
url http://www.anci.ch/doku.php?id=beitrag:bruinsma
work_keys_str_mv AT fredjbruinsma theroomatthetopseparateopinionsinthegrandchambersoftheechr19982006
AT fredjbruinsma roomatthetopseparateopinionsinthegrandchambersoftheechr19982006