The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities

Objective: To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akshilkumar Patel, Sameer Massand, John Ingraham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:Surgery in Practice and Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262022000468
_version_ 1817986521013157888
author Akshilkumar Patel
Sameer Massand
John Ingraham
author_facet Akshilkumar Patel
Sameer Massand
John Ingraham
author_sort Akshilkumar Patel
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms and search term combinations. These studies were evaluated for inclusion based on PRISMA criteria. Participants: Literature searches were performed from June to December 2020, and articles were collected if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies were also qualitatively assessed to determine whether the described education modality demonstrated high fidelity (anatomic accuracy and similarity to true surgery) and efficacy (improved trainee performance in a standardized skills evaluation). Results: Initial database searches resulted in 2,849 total articles. Of these, 451 articles were deemed relevant for screening, and after applying additional exclusion criteria, 202 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Articles were organized into three broad categories: physical models (n = 42, 63.7%), virtual simulators (n = 16, 24.2%), and online resources (n = 8, 12.1%). Among the physical models, we identified 15 high fidelity, 20 high efficacy, 5 high fidelity and high efficacy, and 2 high efficacy but low fidelity models. Among the virtual simulators, 6 demonstrated high fidelity, 8 high efficacy, and 2 demonstrated both values. Among the online resources, 3 showed high fidelity and 3 showed high efficacy. Conclusions: A variety of remote training modalities have been published, including articles describing virtual surgical simulators, virtual and physical anatomic models, and online resources with video modules. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how effectively training received through remote means translates to practice in live clinical scenarios in the operating room. ACGME competency addressed: Practice-based Learning and Improvement.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:10:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2699619f46b3444cb102c672058123e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-2620
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:10:19Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Surgery in Practice and Science
spelling doaj.art-2699619f46b3444cb102c672058123e62022-12-22T02:23:21ZengElsevierSurgery in Practice and Science2666-26202022-09-0110100102The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalitiesAkshilkumar Patel0Sameer Massand1John Ingraham2College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 700 HMC Crescent Road, Hershey, PA 17033, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation, and Humanities, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USADivision of Plastic Surgery, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation, and Humanities, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA; Corresponding author.Objective: To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms and search term combinations. These studies were evaluated for inclusion based on PRISMA criteria. Participants: Literature searches were performed from June to December 2020, and articles were collected if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies were also qualitatively assessed to determine whether the described education modality demonstrated high fidelity (anatomic accuracy and similarity to true surgery) and efficacy (improved trainee performance in a standardized skills evaluation). Results: Initial database searches resulted in 2,849 total articles. Of these, 451 articles were deemed relevant for screening, and after applying additional exclusion criteria, 202 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Articles were organized into three broad categories: physical models (n = 42, 63.7%), virtual simulators (n = 16, 24.2%), and online resources (n = 8, 12.1%). Among the physical models, we identified 15 high fidelity, 20 high efficacy, 5 high fidelity and high efficacy, and 2 high efficacy but low fidelity models. Among the virtual simulators, 6 demonstrated high fidelity, 8 high efficacy, and 2 demonstrated both values. Among the online resources, 3 showed high fidelity and 3 showed high efficacy. Conclusions: A variety of remote training modalities have been published, including articles describing virtual surgical simulators, virtual and physical anatomic models, and online resources with video modules. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how effectively training received through remote means translates to practice in live clinical scenarios in the operating room. ACGME competency addressed: Practice-based Learning and Improvement.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262022000468Systematic reviewPlastic surgeryVirtual simulationSurgical modelsOnline education
spellingShingle Akshilkumar Patel
Sameer Massand
John Ingraham
The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
Surgery in Practice and Science
Systematic review
Plastic surgery
Virtual simulation
Surgical models
Online education
title The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
title_full The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
title_fullStr The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
title_full_unstemmed The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
title_short The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
title_sort state of remote learning in plastic surgery a systematic review of modalities
topic Systematic review
Plastic surgery
Virtual simulation
Surgical models
Online education
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262022000468
work_keys_str_mv AT akshilkumarpatel thestateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities
AT sameermassand thestateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities
AT johningraham thestateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities
AT akshilkumarpatel stateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities
AT sameermassand stateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities
AT johningraham stateofremotelearninginplasticsurgeryasystematicreviewofmodalities