Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations

ObjectiveIndividuals’ decisions to engage in exercise are often the result of in-the-moment choices between exercise and a competing behavioral alternative. The purpose of this study was to investigate processes that occur in-the-moment (i.e., situated processes) when individuals are faced with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinika Timme, Ralf Brand, Michaela Raboldt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049356/full
_version_ 1797937879905730560
author Sinika Timme
Ralf Brand
Michaela Raboldt
author_facet Sinika Timme
Ralf Brand
Michaela Raboldt
author_sort Sinika Timme
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveIndividuals’ decisions to engage in exercise are often the result of in-the-moment choices between exercise and a competing behavioral alternative. The purpose of this study was to investigate processes that occur in-the-moment (i.e., situated processes) when individuals are faced with the choice between exercise and a behavioral alternative during a computerized task. These were analyzed against the background of interindividual differences in individuals’ automatic valuation and controlled evaluation of exercise.MethodIn a behavioral alternatives task 101 participants were asked whether they would rather choose an exercise option or a behavioral alternative in 25 trials. Participants’ gaze behavior (first gaze and fixations) was recorded using eye-tracking. An exercise-specific affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was used to assess participants’ automatic valuation of exercise before the task. After the task, self-reported feelings towards exercise (controlled evaluation) and usual weekly exercise volume were assessed. Mixed effects models with random effects for subjects and trials were used for data analysis.ResultsChoosing exercise was positively correlated with individuals’ automatic valuation (r = 0.20, p = 0.05), controlled evaluation (r = 0.58, p < 0.001), and their weekly exercise volume (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). Participants showed no bias in their initial gaze or number of fixations towards the exercise or the non-exercise alternative. However, participants were 1.30 times more likely to fixate on the chosen alternative first and more frequently, but this gaze behavior was not related to individuals’ automatic valuation, controlled evaluation, or weekly exercise volume.ConclusionThe results suggest that situated processes arising from defined behavioral alternatives may be independent of individuals’ general preferences. Despite one’s best general intention to exercise more, the choice of a non-exercise alternative behavior may seem more appealing in-the-moment and eventually be chosen. New psychological theories of health behavior change should therefore better consider the role of potentially conflicting alternatives when it comes to initiating physical activity or exercise.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:51:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-269cd76448f9452aa8f682a214c83de3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:51:07Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-269cd76448f9452aa8f682a214c83de32023-02-01T06:39:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-02-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.10493561049356Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerationsSinika TimmeRalf BrandMichaela RaboldtObjectiveIndividuals’ decisions to engage in exercise are often the result of in-the-moment choices between exercise and a competing behavioral alternative. The purpose of this study was to investigate processes that occur in-the-moment (i.e., situated processes) when individuals are faced with the choice between exercise and a behavioral alternative during a computerized task. These were analyzed against the background of interindividual differences in individuals’ automatic valuation and controlled evaluation of exercise.MethodIn a behavioral alternatives task 101 participants were asked whether they would rather choose an exercise option or a behavioral alternative in 25 trials. Participants’ gaze behavior (first gaze and fixations) was recorded using eye-tracking. An exercise-specific affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was used to assess participants’ automatic valuation of exercise before the task. After the task, self-reported feelings towards exercise (controlled evaluation) and usual weekly exercise volume were assessed. Mixed effects models with random effects for subjects and trials were used for data analysis.ResultsChoosing exercise was positively correlated with individuals’ automatic valuation (r = 0.20, p = 0.05), controlled evaluation (r = 0.58, p < 0.001), and their weekly exercise volume (r = 0.43, p < 0.001). Participants showed no bias in their initial gaze or number of fixations towards the exercise or the non-exercise alternative. However, participants were 1.30 times more likely to fixate on the chosen alternative first and more frequently, but this gaze behavior was not related to individuals’ automatic valuation, controlled evaluation, or weekly exercise volume.ConclusionThe results suggest that situated processes arising from defined behavioral alternatives may be independent of individuals’ general preferences. Despite one’s best general intention to exercise more, the choice of a non-exercise alternative behavior may seem more appealing in-the-moment and eventually be chosen. New psychological theories of health behavior change should therefore better consider the role of potentially conflicting alternatives when it comes to initiating physical activity or exercise.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049356/fulleye-trackingdual-process modelssituated processesmotivationphysical activity
spellingShingle Sinika Timme
Ralf Brand
Michaela Raboldt
Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
Frontiers in Psychology
eye-tracking
dual-process models
situated processes
motivation
physical activity
title Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
title_full Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
title_fullStr Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
title_full_unstemmed Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
title_short Exercise or not? An empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
title_sort exercise or not an empirical illustration of the role of behavioral alternatives in exercise motivation and resulting theoretical considerations
topic eye-tracking
dual-process models
situated processes
motivation
physical activity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049356/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sinikatimme exerciseornotanempiricalillustrationoftheroleofbehavioralalternativesinexercisemotivationandresultingtheoreticalconsiderations
AT ralfbrand exerciseornotanempiricalillustrationoftheroleofbehavioralalternativesinexercisemotivationandresultingtheoreticalconsiderations
AT michaelaraboldt exerciseornotanempiricalillustrationoftheroleofbehavioralalternativesinexercisemotivationandresultingtheoreticalconsiderations