Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon.
In herbivorous insects, food selection depends on sensitivity to specific chemical stimuli from host-plants as well as to secondary metabolites (bitter) and to sugars (phagostimulatory). Bitter compounds are noxious, unpalatable or both and evoke an aversive feeding response. Instead, sugars and sug...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067346?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1811266930143657984 |
---|---|
author | Giorgia Sollai Iole Tomassini Barbarossa Carla Masala Paolo Solari Roberto Crnjar |
author_facet | Giorgia Sollai Iole Tomassini Barbarossa Carla Masala Paolo Solari Roberto Crnjar |
author_sort | Giorgia Sollai |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In herbivorous insects, food selection depends on sensitivity to specific chemical stimuli from host-plants as well as to secondary metabolites (bitter) and to sugars (phagostimulatory). Bitter compounds are noxious, unpalatable or both and evoke an aversive feeding response. Instead, sugars and sugar alcohols play a critical role in determining and enhancing the palatability of foods. We assumed that peripheral taste sensitivity may be related to the width of the host selection. Our model consists of two closely phylogenetically related Papilionid species exhibiting a difference in host plant choice: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. The spike activity of the lateral and medial maxillary styloconic taste sensilla was recorded following stimulation with several carbohydrates, nicotine and NaCl, with the aim of characterizing their gustatory receptor neurons and of comparing their response patterns in the light of their different acceptability in feeding behaviour. The results show that: a) each sensillum houses phagostimulant and phagodeterrent cells; b) the spike activity of the gustatory neurons in response to different taste stimuli is higher in P. hospiton than in P. machaon; c) sugar solutions inhibit the spike activity of the deterrent and salt cells, and the suppression is higher in P. machaon than in P. hospiton. In conclusion, we propose that the different balance between the phagostimulant and phagodeterrent inputs from GRNs of maxillary sensilla may contribute in determining the difference in food choice and host range. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:52:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-26b0828af40c410bab2f0f836ae9d430 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:52:10Z |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-26b0828af40c410bab2f0f836ae9d4302022-12-22T03:17:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e10067510.1371/journal.pone.0100675Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon.Giorgia SollaiIole Tomassini BarbarossaCarla MasalaPaolo SolariRoberto CrnjarIn herbivorous insects, food selection depends on sensitivity to specific chemical stimuli from host-plants as well as to secondary metabolites (bitter) and to sugars (phagostimulatory). Bitter compounds are noxious, unpalatable or both and evoke an aversive feeding response. Instead, sugars and sugar alcohols play a critical role in determining and enhancing the palatability of foods. We assumed that peripheral taste sensitivity may be related to the width of the host selection. Our model consists of two closely phylogenetically related Papilionid species exhibiting a difference in host plant choice: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. The spike activity of the lateral and medial maxillary styloconic taste sensilla was recorded following stimulation with several carbohydrates, nicotine and NaCl, with the aim of characterizing their gustatory receptor neurons and of comparing their response patterns in the light of their different acceptability in feeding behaviour. The results show that: a) each sensillum houses phagostimulant and phagodeterrent cells; b) the spike activity of the gustatory neurons in response to different taste stimuli is higher in P. hospiton than in P. machaon; c) sugar solutions inhibit the spike activity of the deterrent and salt cells, and the suppression is higher in P. machaon than in P. hospiton. In conclusion, we propose that the different balance between the phagostimulant and phagodeterrent inputs from GRNs of maxillary sensilla may contribute in determining the difference in food choice and host range.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067346?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Giorgia Sollai Iole Tomassini Barbarossa Carla Masala Paolo Solari Roberto Crnjar Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. PLoS ONE |
title | Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. |
title_full | Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. |
title_fullStr | Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. |
title_full_unstemmed | Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. |
title_short | Gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species: Papilio hospiton and Papilio machaon. |
title_sort | gustatory sensitivity and food acceptance in two phylogenetically closely related papilionid species papilio hospiton and papilio machaon |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4067346?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giorgiasollai gustatorysensitivityandfoodacceptanceintwophylogeneticallycloselyrelatedpapilionidspeciespapiliohospitonandpapiliomachaon AT ioletomassinibarbarossa gustatorysensitivityandfoodacceptanceintwophylogeneticallycloselyrelatedpapilionidspeciespapiliohospitonandpapiliomachaon AT carlamasala gustatorysensitivityandfoodacceptanceintwophylogeneticallycloselyrelatedpapilionidspeciespapiliohospitonandpapiliomachaon AT paolosolari gustatorysensitivityandfoodacceptanceintwophylogeneticallycloselyrelatedpapilionidspeciespapiliohospitonandpapiliomachaon AT robertocrnjar gustatorysensitivityandfoodacceptanceintwophylogeneticallycloselyrelatedpapilionidspeciespapiliohospitonandpapiliomachaon |