Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays

The use of alternative low polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) binders in taphole clays is essential due to health and environmental concerns associated with PAHs. Binders that could potentially substitute for highly-temperature coal tar pitch (CTPht) or coal tar (CTht) in taphole clays were inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I.J.-P. Cameron, S. Ramjee, A.M. Garbers-Craig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Open Ceramics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539523001426
_version_ 1797390402311946240
author I.J.-P. Cameron
S. Ramjee
A.M. Garbers-Craig
author_facet I.J.-P. Cameron
S. Ramjee
A.M. Garbers-Craig
author_sort I.J.-P. Cameron
collection DOAJ
description The use of alternative low polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) binders in taphole clays is essential due to health and environmental concerns associated with PAHs. Binders that could potentially substitute for highly-temperature coal tar pitch (CTPht) or coal tar (CTht) in taphole clays were investigated. These include coal tar pitch blend, low PAH coal tar pitch, petroleum-based binders and wood-based tars from various sources. The binders were characterized according to chemical composition, with an emphasis on the identification of 16-EPA-PAH (well-known carcinogens), as well as rheology and volatilization behaviour. The alternative binders were ranked according to the analytical results, with the coal tar reference binder, CTht, serving as the benchmark. Beechwood tar (Tar-BW) and crude waxy oil (CWO) showed the most favourable results for replacing CTht in taphole clay. Both have higher viscosities than CTht, lower BE-values (indicating lower toxicity), and higher degrees of mass loss over a wider temperature range.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:10:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-26b6985965654ea4afac0013bc651447
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:10:11Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Open Ceramics
spelling doaj.art-26b6985965654ea4afac0013bc6514472023-12-15T07:26:17ZengElsevierOpen Ceramics2666-53952023-12-0116100470Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole claysI.J.-P. Cameron0S. Ramjee1A.M. Garbers-Craig2Centre for Pyrometallurgy, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South AfricaCentre for Pyrometallurgy, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South AfricaCorresponding author.; Centre for Pyrometallurgy, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South AfricaThe use of alternative low polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) binders in taphole clays is essential due to health and environmental concerns associated with PAHs. Binders that could potentially substitute for highly-temperature coal tar pitch (CTPht) or coal tar (CTht) in taphole clays were investigated. These include coal tar pitch blend, low PAH coal tar pitch, petroleum-based binders and wood-based tars from various sources. The binders were characterized according to chemical composition, with an emphasis on the identification of 16-EPA-PAH (well-known carcinogens), as well as rheology and volatilization behaviour. The alternative binders were ranked according to the analytical results, with the coal tar reference binder, CTht, serving as the benchmark. Beechwood tar (Tar-BW) and crude waxy oil (CWO) showed the most favourable results for replacing CTht in taphole clay. Both have higher viscosities than CTht, lower BE-values (indicating lower toxicity), and higher degrees of mass loss over a wider temperature range.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539523001426Taphole clayBindersPAHToxicity
spellingShingle I.J.-P. Cameron
S. Ramjee
A.M. Garbers-Craig
Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
Open Ceramics
Taphole clay
Binders
PAH
Toxicity
title Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
title_full Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
title_fullStr Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
title_short Comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) alternative binders for use in taphole clays
title_sort comparative study between coal tar pitch and lower polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pah alternative binders for use in taphole clays
topic Taphole clay
Binders
PAH
Toxicity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539523001426
work_keys_str_mv AT ijpcameron comparativestudybetweencoaltarpitchandlowerpolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonpahalternativebindersforuseintapholeclays
AT sramjee comparativestudybetweencoaltarpitchandlowerpolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonpahalternativebindersforuseintapholeclays
AT amgarberscraig comparativestudybetweencoaltarpitchandlowerpolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonpahalternativebindersforuseintapholeclays