Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)

ABSTRACTBalancing the demand for ecosystem services (ES) with available supply is one key challenge for decision making in sustainable landscape management. ES demand is context-specific. Therefore, the assessment of perceptions articulated by multiple societal actors in different regions can help t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Küchen, Thomas M. Schmitt, Rebekka Riebl, Maria Hänsel, Manuel J. Steinbauer, Ute Fricke, Sarah Redlich, Thomas Koellner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Ecosystems and People
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2023.2192813
_version_ 1797385477537398784
author Lisa Küchen
Thomas M. Schmitt
Rebekka Riebl
Maria Hänsel
Manuel J. Steinbauer
Ute Fricke
Sarah Redlich
Thomas Koellner
author_facet Lisa Küchen
Thomas M. Schmitt
Rebekka Riebl
Maria Hänsel
Manuel J. Steinbauer
Ute Fricke
Sarah Redlich
Thomas Koellner
author_sort Lisa Küchen
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTBalancing the demand for ecosystem services (ES) with available supply is one key challenge for decision making in sustainable landscape management. ES demand is context-specific. Therefore, the assessment of perceptions articulated by multiple societal actors in different regions can help to identify differences and commonalities in predominant preferences for landscapes and their ES. The goal of this study was to investigate four societal actor groups (citizens, farmers, foresters, nature managers) in 12 study regions across Bavaria, Germany, with respect to their valuation of landscapes and ES provided by certain landscape elements. The 2,438 participants mapped specific locations and selected landscape elements that they perceived as valuable, and further elaborated on this value in open statements. We applied qualitative content analysis, word frequency analysis, spatial location-density analysis, and statistical testing. The perceived value of landscape elements for ES differed across actor groups and regions. Preference for landscape elements was driven by topography and land use and was significantly associated with actor groups. The most apparent differences occurred between farmers and nature managers. Generally, participants preferred forests, water bodies, natural landscapes, and distinct geographical structures. The landscape was mostly valued for its habitat, diverse wildlife, recreational purposes, climate-regulating functions, and provisioning of water and food. We conclude that, although differences exist among societal actors, the study respondents highly valued the importance of functioning and diverse ecosystems. The high perceived value for many ecosystem services and species protection suggests that ambitious policy measures are supported by different societal actors.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:54:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-26cdd95988714d6289bf95a26e08290c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-5908
2639-5916
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:54:47Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Ecosystems and People
spelling doaj.art-26cdd95988714d6289bf95a26e08290c2023-12-20T00:08:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEcosystems and People2639-59082639-59162023-12-0119110.1080/26395916.2023.2192813Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)Lisa Küchen0Thomas M. Schmitt1Rebekka Riebl2Maria Hänsel3Manuel J. Steinbauer4Ute Fricke5Sarah Redlich6Thomas Koellner7Ecological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyEcological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyEcological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyEcological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanySports Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER) & Bayreuth Center of Sport Science (BaySpo), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, GermanyEcological Services, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, GermanyABSTRACTBalancing the demand for ecosystem services (ES) with available supply is one key challenge for decision making in sustainable landscape management. ES demand is context-specific. Therefore, the assessment of perceptions articulated by multiple societal actors in different regions can help to identify differences and commonalities in predominant preferences for landscapes and their ES. The goal of this study was to investigate four societal actor groups (citizens, farmers, foresters, nature managers) in 12 study regions across Bavaria, Germany, with respect to their valuation of landscapes and ES provided by certain landscape elements. The 2,438 participants mapped specific locations and selected landscape elements that they perceived as valuable, and further elaborated on this value in open statements. We applied qualitative content analysis, word frequency analysis, spatial location-density analysis, and statistical testing. The perceived value of landscape elements for ES differed across actor groups and regions. Preference for landscape elements was driven by topography and land use and was significantly associated with actor groups. The most apparent differences occurred between farmers and nature managers. Generally, participants preferred forests, water bodies, natural landscapes, and distinct geographical structures. The landscape was mostly valued for its habitat, diverse wildlife, recreational purposes, climate-regulating functions, and provisioning of water and food. We conclude that, although differences exist among societal actors, the study respondents highly valued the importance of functioning and diverse ecosystems. The high perceived value for many ecosystem services and species protection suggests that ambitious policy measures are supported by different societal actors.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2023.2192813Cristina Quintas-SorianoSocio-cultural valuationperceptions of valuesocietal actorsqualitative content analysisland-use
spellingShingle Lisa Küchen
Thomas M. Schmitt
Rebekka Riebl
Maria Hänsel
Manuel J. Steinbauer
Ute Fricke
Sarah Redlich
Thomas Koellner
Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
Ecosystems and People
Cristina Quintas-Soriano
Socio-cultural valuation
perceptions of value
societal actors
qualitative content analysis
land-use
title Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
title_full Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
title_fullStr Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
title_full_unstemmed Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
title_short Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
title_sort where and why is landscape considered valuable societal actors perceptions of ecosystem services across bavaria germany
topic Cristina Quintas-Soriano
Socio-cultural valuation
perceptions of value
societal actors
qualitative content analysis
land-use
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/26395916.2023.2192813
work_keys_str_mv AT lisakuchen whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT thomasmschmitt whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT rebekkariebl whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT mariahansel whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT manueljsteinbauer whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT utefricke whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT sarahredlich whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany
AT thomaskoellner whereandwhyislandscapeconsideredvaluablesocietalactorsperceptionsofecosystemservicesacrossbavariagermany