Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device

Atmospheric microplastics (MPs) are a ubiquitous environmental contaminant of emerging concern. Sampling methods provide information relating to surface area concentration and MP characteristics, without direct comparison with routinely measured standard air quality parameters. This study analysed 6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren C. Jenner, Rameez Raja Kureshi, David White, Emma Chapman, Laura R. Sadofsky, Jeanette M. Rotchell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2017
_version_ 1797461474623356928
author Lauren C. Jenner
Rameez Raja Kureshi
David White
Emma Chapman
Laura R. Sadofsky
Jeanette M. Rotchell
author_facet Lauren C. Jenner
Rameez Raja Kureshi
David White
Emma Chapman
Laura R. Sadofsky
Jeanette M. Rotchell
author_sort Lauren C. Jenner
collection DOAJ
description Atmospheric microplastics (MPs) are a ubiquitous environmental contaminant of emerging concern. Sampling methods provide information relating to surface area concentration and MP characteristics, without direct comparison with routinely measured standard air quality parameters. This study analysed 6 active air samples generated by a local authority as part of their routine air quality monitoring activities. Continuous sampling totalled 10 months, within the city centre of Kingston-upon-Hull. By using μFTIR analysis, levels of total particles detected using the NOx inlet filters ranged from 5139 ± 2843 particles m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>, comprising 1029 ± 594 MPs m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. The controls displayed a mean level of 2.00 ± 3.49 MPs. The polymers nylon (32%) and polypropylene, PP (22%) were the most abundant. Small fragments of 47.42 ± 48.57 μm (length) and 21.75 ± 13.62 μm (width) were most common. An increase in MP levels during April 2020 coincided with an increase in PM<sub>10</sub> levels. This study used robust procedures to measure MPs in the air by exploiting existing air quality monitoring equipment. Knowing the levels, types, and characteristics of MPs can inform toxicity studies to provide more environmentally relevant exposures, which is urgent now that MPs have been reported in human lung tissue.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:20:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-26ead71a47d842c1a308cf0cf1e5478d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:20:51Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-26ead71a47d842c1a308cf0cf1e5478d2023-11-24T13:11:26ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-11-011312201710.3390/atmos13122017Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring DeviceLauren C. Jenner0Rameez Raja Kureshi1David White2Emma Chapman3Laura R. Sadofsky4Jeanette M. Rotchell5Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull HU6 7RX, UKSchool of Computer Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull HU6 7RX, UKHull City Council, Air Quality Officer, Environmental Regulation, 33, Witham, Kingston upon Hull HU9 1DB, UKSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull HU6 7RX, UKHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull HU6 7RX, UKSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull HU6 7RX, UKAtmospheric microplastics (MPs) are a ubiquitous environmental contaminant of emerging concern. Sampling methods provide information relating to surface area concentration and MP characteristics, without direct comparison with routinely measured standard air quality parameters. This study analysed 6 active air samples generated by a local authority as part of their routine air quality monitoring activities. Continuous sampling totalled 10 months, within the city centre of Kingston-upon-Hull. By using μFTIR analysis, levels of total particles detected using the NOx inlet filters ranged from 5139 ± 2843 particles m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>, comprising 1029 ± 594 MPs m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. The controls displayed a mean level of 2.00 ± 3.49 MPs. The polymers nylon (32%) and polypropylene, PP (22%) were the most abundant. Small fragments of 47.42 ± 48.57 μm (length) and 21.75 ± 13.62 μm (width) were most common. An increase in MP levels during April 2020 coincided with an increase in PM<sub>10</sub> levels. This study used robust procedures to measure MPs in the air by exploiting existing air quality monitoring equipment. Knowing the levels, types, and characteristics of MPs can inform toxicity studies to provide more environmentally relevant exposures, which is urgent now that MPs have been reported in human lung tissue.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2017microplastic and atmosphericpolymerdepositionoutdoorairμFTIR
spellingShingle Lauren C. Jenner
Rameez Raja Kureshi
David White
Emma Chapman
Laura R. Sadofsky
Jeanette M. Rotchell
Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
Atmosphere
microplastic and atmospheric
polymer
deposition
outdoor
air
μFTIR
title Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
title_full Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
title_fullStr Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
title_full_unstemmed Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
title_short Outdoor Microplastic Analysis Using Inlet Filters from an NOx Regulatory Air Quality Monitoring Device
title_sort outdoor microplastic analysis using inlet filters from an nox regulatory air quality monitoring device
topic microplastic and atmospheric
polymer
deposition
outdoor
air
μFTIR
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2017
work_keys_str_mv AT laurencjenner outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice
AT rameezrajakureshi outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice
AT davidwhite outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice
AT emmachapman outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice
AT laurarsadofsky outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice
AT jeanettemrotchell outdoormicroplasticanalysisusinginletfiltersfromannoxregulatoryairqualitymonitoringdevice