Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age

Recent studies find that health returns to education are elevated among those who come from disadvantaged families. These findings suggest that education may be a health resource that compensates or “substitutes” for lower parental socioeconomic status. Alternatively, some studies find support for a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew A. Andersson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-12-01
Series:SSM: Population Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827316300520
_version_ 1818845005558579200
author Matthew A. Andersson
author_facet Matthew A. Andersson
author_sort Matthew A. Andersson
collection DOAJ
description Recent studies find that health returns to education are elevated among those who come from disadvantaged families. These findings suggest that education may be a health resource that compensates or “substitutes” for lower parental socioeconomic status. Alternatively, some studies find support for a cumulative (dis)advantage perspective, such that educational health returns are higher among those who already were advantaged, widening initial health (dis)advantages across the life course. However, it remains unclear whether these findings are dependent on gender or cohort, and this is a fundamental oversight given marked differences between men and women in educational and health inequalities across the twentieth century. Drawing on national US data (1980–2002 General Social Survey with 2008 National Death Index Link), I indeed find that the presence or strength of resource substitution or cumulative (dis)advantage depends upon health measure as well as gender and cohort. For self-rated health, cumulative (dis)advantage explains educational health disparities, but among men only. Cumulative (dis)advantage in avoiding fair or poor health is partly explained by cohort and age variation in health returns to education, and cumulative (dis)advantage in excellent health is more robust in earlier cohorts and at older ages. For mortality, resource substitution is instead supported, but for women only. Among those from disadvantaged families, educational mortality buffering increases with cohort but diminishes with age. Taken together, these findings confirm prior research showing that adult health inequalities linked to education depend on family background, and extend this work by demonstrating that the nature and extent of these dynamics differ considerably depending on the health outcome being assessed and on an individual's historical context, life course stage, and gender. Keywords: Self-rated health, Mortality, Education, Gender, Cohort, Age
first_indexed 2024-12-19T05:22:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-26f7e1e73c6b44528e7929af6d9d35d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8273
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T05:22:47Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Population Health
spelling doaj.art-26f7e1e73c6b44528e7929af6d9d35d32022-12-21T20:34:27ZengElsevierSSM: Population Health2352-82732016-12-012549560Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and ageMatthew A. Andersson0Department of Sociology, Baylor University, One Bear Place, P.O. Box 97326, Waco, TX 76798, USARecent studies find that health returns to education are elevated among those who come from disadvantaged families. These findings suggest that education may be a health resource that compensates or “substitutes” for lower parental socioeconomic status. Alternatively, some studies find support for a cumulative (dis)advantage perspective, such that educational health returns are higher among those who already were advantaged, widening initial health (dis)advantages across the life course. However, it remains unclear whether these findings are dependent on gender or cohort, and this is a fundamental oversight given marked differences between men and women in educational and health inequalities across the twentieth century. Drawing on national US data (1980–2002 General Social Survey with 2008 National Death Index Link), I indeed find that the presence or strength of resource substitution or cumulative (dis)advantage depends upon health measure as well as gender and cohort. For self-rated health, cumulative (dis)advantage explains educational health disparities, but among men only. Cumulative (dis)advantage in avoiding fair or poor health is partly explained by cohort and age variation in health returns to education, and cumulative (dis)advantage in excellent health is more robust in earlier cohorts and at older ages. For mortality, resource substitution is instead supported, but for women only. Among those from disadvantaged families, educational mortality buffering increases with cohort but diminishes with age. Taken together, these findings confirm prior research showing that adult health inequalities linked to education depend on family background, and extend this work by demonstrating that the nature and extent of these dynamics differ considerably depending on the health outcome being assessed and on an individual's historical context, life course stage, and gender. Keywords: Self-rated health, Mortality, Education, Gender, Cohort, Agehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827316300520
spellingShingle Matthew A. Andersson
Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
SSM: Population Health
title Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
title_full Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
title_fullStr Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
title_full_unstemmed Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
title_short Health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins, 1980–2008: Testing the importance of gender, cohort, and age
title_sort health returns to education by family socioeconomic origins 1980 2008 testing the importance of gender cohort and age
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827316300520
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewaandersson healthreturnstoeducationbyfamilysocioeconomicorigins19802008testingtheimportanceofgendercohortandage