A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conventional open pedicle screw fixation (COPSF), percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and paraspinal posterior open approach pedicle screw fixation (POPSF) for treating neurolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao Zhu, Bin Wang, Jian Yin, Xin Hui Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02459-6
_version_ 1828136762483933184
author Chao Zhu
Bin Wang
Jian Yin
Xin Hui Liu
author_facet Chao Zhu
Bin Wang
Jian Yin
Xin Hui Liu
author_sort Chao Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conventional open pedicle screw fixation (COPSF), percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and paraspinal posterior open approach pedicle screw fixation (POPSF) for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who were posteriorly stabilized without graft fusion. Among them, 36 patients underwent COPSF, 38 patients underwent PPSF, and 34 patients underwent POPSF. The clinical outcomes, relative operation indexes, and radiological findings were assessed and compared among the 3 groups. Results All of the patients were followed up for a mean time of 20 months. The PPSF group and POPSF group had shorter operation times, lower amounts of intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the COPSF group (P < 0.05). The radiation times and hospitalization costs were highest in the PPSF group (P < 0.05). Every group exhibited significant improvements in the Cobb angle (CA) and the vertebral body angle (VBA) correction (all P < 0.05). The COPSF group and the POPSF group had better improvements than the PPSF group at 3 days postoperation and the POPSF group had the best improvements in the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both PPSF and POPSF achieved similar effects as COPSF while also resulting in lower incidences of injury. PPSF is more advantageous in the early rehabilitation time period, compared with COPSF, but POPSF is a better option when considering the long-term effects, the costs of treatment, and the radiation times.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:09:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27096a9f08af4fd19ddafb9567c2b130
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T18:09:26Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-27096a9f08af4fd19ddafb9567c2b1302022-12-22T04:10:11ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2021-05-011611810.1186/s13018-021-02459-6A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective studyChao Zhu0Bin Wang1Jian Yin2Xin Hui Liu3Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conventional open pedicle screw fixation (COPSF), percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and paraspinal posterior open approach pedicle screw fixation (POPSF) for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who were posteriorly stabilized without graft fusion. Among them, 36 patients underwent COPSF, 38 patients underwent PPSF, and 34 patients underwent POPSF. The clinical outcomes, relative operation indexes, and radiological findings were assessed and compared among the 3 groups. Results All of the patients were followed up for a mean time of 20 months. The PPSF group and POPSF group had shorter operation times, lower amounts of intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the COPSF group (P < 0.05). The radiation times and hospitalization costs were highest in the PPSF group (P < 0.05). Every group exhibited significant improvements in the Cobb angle (CA) and the vertebral body angle (VBA) correction (all P < 0.05). The COPSF group and the POPSF group had better improvements than the PPSF group at 3 days postoperation and the POPSF group had the best improvements in the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both PPSF and POPSF achieved similar effects as COPSF while also resulting in lower incidences of injury. PPSF is more advantageous in the early rehabilitation time period, compared with COPSF, but POPSF is a better option when considering the long-term effects, the costs of treatment, and the radiation times.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02459-6Pedicle screw fixationOpenPercutaneousParaspinalThoracolumbar fracture
spellingShingle Chao Zhu
Bin Wang
Jian Yin
Xin Hui Liu
A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Pedicle screw fixation
Open
Percutaneous
Paraspinal
Thoracolumbar fracture
title A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
title_full A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
title_fullStr A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
title_short A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures a retrospective study
topic Pedicle screw fixation
Open
Percutaneous
Paraspinal
Thoracolumbar fracture
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02459-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chaozhu acomparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT binwang acomparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT jianyin acomparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT xinhuiliu acomparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT chaozhu comparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT binwang comparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT jianyin comparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy
AT xinhuiliu comparisonofthreedifferentsurgeryapproachesandmethodsforneurologicallyintactthoracolumbarfracturesaretrospectivestudy