Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer

Background: Cryopreservation of all embryos followed by transfer in subsequent cycles has emerged as an effective alternative to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in order to overcome the negative effect of superovulation on endometrial receptivity. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the reproducti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reeta Biliangady, Rubina Pandit, Nutan Kumari Tudu, Poornima Kinila, Uma Maheswari, Indu S. T Gopal, Ambika G Swamy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2019;volume=12;issue=4;spage=321;epage=326;aulast=Biliangady
_version_ 1818264373557198848
author Reeta Biliangady
Rubina Pandit
Nutan Kumari Tudu
Poornima Kinila
Uma Maheswari
Indu S. T Gopal
Ambika G Swamy
author_facet Reeta Biliangady
Rubina Pandit
Nutan Kumari Tudu
Poornima Kinila
Uma Maheswari
Indu S. T Gopal
Ambika G Swamy
author_sort Reeta Biliangady
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cryopreservation of all embryos followed by transfer in subsequent cycles has emerged as an effective alternative to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in order to overcome the negative effect of superovulation on endometrial receptivity. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive outcomes between fresh ET and first frozen ET (FET) from “freeze-all” group of embryos. Setting: This study was conducted at a private in vitro fertilization center. Design: This was a retrospective study. Patients and Methods: A total of 503 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria between 2012 and 2017 were included. Of 503, 386 patients underwent fresh ET and 117 patients underwent FET following cryopreservation of all embryos. The results of only first FET were considered to eliminate the confounding factor of poor-quality embryos in subsequent transfer. Results: FET resulted in statistically significant higher live birth rate (44.44% vs. 33.41%), implantation rate (45.08% vs. 30.22%), and clinical pregnancy rate (57.26% vs. 38.6%) compared to fresh ETs. No difference was observed in the abortion rate between the two groups. Conclusion: Reproductive outcomes were significantly better in the freeze-all group compared to fresh ET suggesting that the altered hormone levels during controlled ovarian stimulation could mediate an asynchrony between the endometrium and the transferred embryos, leading to implantation failure.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T19:33:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-270bcf237a1d4a6e8a2b8d1344ae94b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T19:33:53Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
spelling doaj.art-270bcf237a1d4a6e8a2b8d1344ae94b32022-12-22T00:14:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662019-01-0112432132610.4103/jhrs.JHRS_146_18Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transferReeta BiliangadyRubina PanditNutan Kumari TuduPoornima KinilaUma MaheswariIndu S. T GopalAmbika G SwamyBackground: Cryopreservation of all embryos followed by transfer in subsequent cycles has emerged as an effective alternative to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in order to overcome the negative effect of superovulation on endometrial receptivity. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive outcomes between fresh ET and first frozen ET (FET) from “freeze-all” group of embryos. Setting: This study was conducted at a private in vitro fertilization center. Design: This was a retrospective study. Patients and Methods: A total of 503 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria between 2012 and 2017 were included. Of 503, 386 patients underwent fresh ET and 117 patients underwent FET following cryopreservation of all embryos. The results of only first FET were considered to eliminate the confounding factor of poor-quality embryos in subsequent transfer. Results: FET resulted in statistically significant higher live birth rate (44.44% vs. 33.41%), implantation rate (45.08% vs. 30.22%), and clinical pregnancy rate (57.26% vs. 38.6%) compared to fresh ETs. No difference was observed in the abortion rate between the two groups. Conclusion: Reproductive outcomes were significantly better in the freeze-all group compared to fresh ET suggesting that the altered hormone levels during controlled ovarian stimulation could mediate an asynchrony between the endometrium and the transferred embryos, leading to implantation failure.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2019;volume=12;issue=4;spage=321;epage=326;aulast=Biliangadyendometrial receptivityfirst frozen embryo transferfresh embryo transfer
spellingShingle Reeta Biliangady
Rubina Pandit
Nutan Kumari Tudu
Poornima Kinila
Uma Maheswari
Indu S. T Gopal
Ambika G Swamy
Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
endometrial receptivity
first frozen embryo transfer
fresh embryo transfer
title Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
title_full Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
title_fullStr Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
title_full_unstemmed Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
title_short Is it time to move toward freeze-all strategy? – A retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
title_sort is it time to move toward freeze all strategy a retrospective study comparing live birth rates between fresh and first frozen blastocyst transfer
topic endometrial receptivity
first frozen embryo transfer
fresh embryo transfer
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2019;volume=12;issue=4;spage=321;epage=326;aulast=Biliangady
work_keys_str_mv AT reetabiliangady isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT rubinapandit isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT nutankumaritudu isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT poornimakinila isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT umamaheswari isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT industgopal isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer
AT ambikagswamy isittimetomovetowardfreezeallstrategyaretrospectivestudycomparinglivebirthratesbetweenfreshandfirstfrozenblastocysttransfer