FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY

INTRODUCTION Upper limb prosthetic acceptance seems to be relatively unchanged from 1958 where it was measured to be 75% for transradial, 61% for transhumeral, and 35% for shoulder disarticulation levels. A practitioner survey from 2013 by the author found this to be largely unchanged at 79.6%, 5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerald E. Stark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Online Publication Group (COPG) 2018-12-01
Series:Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32045
_version_ 1828554183332069376
author Gerald E. Stark
author_facet Gerald E. Stark
author_sort Gerald E. Stark
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION Upper limb prosthetic acceptance seems to be relatively unchanged from 1958 where it was measured to be 75% for transradial, 61% for transhumeral, and 35% for shoulder disarticulation levels. A practitioner survey from 2013 by the author found this to be largely unchanged at 79.6%, 57.8%, and 32.8% respectively. An upper limb meta-analysis showed that the most significant factors affecting prosthetic rejection using a median rating were function, comfort, ease of use, weight, heat, lack of sensory feedback, inconvenience, lifestyle, dissatisfaction with technology, irritation, and availability of services. An earlier survey by the author condensed these factors of rejection to amputation level, functional advantage, and comfort, and included confidence of the prosthetist, availability of therapy, and support of the patient context. Also it was speculated that the value of factors influencing rejection of prostheses may not be simply the converse of those accepting the prosthesis but different scales. Abstract PDF  Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32045/24459 How to cite: Stark G E.  FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY. CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, 2018; ABSTRACT, ORAL PRESENTATION AT THE AOPA’S 101ST NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, SEPT. 26-29, VANCOUVER, CANADA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32045 Abstracts were Peer-reviewed by the AOPA 2018 National Assembly Scientific Committee.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:32:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-270ccc87309449079060769e0807ea70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-987X
2561-987X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:32:28Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Canadian Online Publication Group (COPG)
record_format Article
series Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal
spelling doaj.art-270ccc87309449079060769e0807ea702022-12-22T00:36:17ZengCanadian Online Publication Group (COPG)Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal2561-987X2561-987X2018-12-0110.33137/cpoj.v1i2.3204532045FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEYGerald E. Stark0School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA.INTRODUCTION Upper limb prosthetic acceptance seems to be relatively unchanged from 1958 where it was measured to be 75% for transradial, 61% for transhumeral, and 35% for shoulder disarticulation levels. A practitioner survey from 2013 by the author found this to be largely unchanged at 79.6%, 57.8%, and 32.8% respectively. An upper limb meta-analysis showed that the most significant factors affecting prosthetic rejection using a median rating were function, comfort, ease of use, weight, heat, lack of sensory feedback, inconvenience, lifestyle, dissatisfaction with technology, irritation, and availability of services. An earlier survey by the author condensed these factors of rejection to amputation level, functional advantage, and comfort, and included confidence of the prosthetist, availability of therapy, and support of the patient context. Also it was speculated that the value of factors influencing rejection of prostheses may not be simply the converse of those accepting the prosthesis but different scales. Abstract PDF  Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32045/24459 How to cite: Stark G E.  FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY. CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, 2018; ABSTRACT, ORAL PRESENTATION AT THE AOPA’S 101ST NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, SEPT. 26-29, VANCOUVER, CANADA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32045 Abstracts were Peer-reviewed by the AOPA 2018 National Assembly Scientific Committee.https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32045transradialtranshumeralUpper limb prostheticprosthesisamputee
spellingShingle Gerald E. Stark
FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal
transradial
transhumeral
Upper limb prosthetic
prosthesis
amputee
title FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
title_full FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
title_fullStr FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
title_full_unstemmed FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
title_short FACTOR ANALYSIS OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHETIC ACCEPTANCE FROM RETROSPECTIVE PROSTHETIC CLINICIAN SURVEY
title_sort factor analysis of upper limb prosthetic acceptance from retrospective prosthetic clinician survey
topic transradial
transhumeral
Upper limb prosthetic
prosthesis
amputee
url https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32045
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldestark factoranalysisofupperlimbprostheticacceptancefromretrospectiveprostheticcliniciansurvey