Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing

Study area: Kikuletwa catchment, Upper Pangani River Basin, Tanzania. Study focus: This study compared yearly blue and green water fluxes using four different methods: Senay’s method (SN) (Senay et al., 2016), van Eekelen method (EK) (van Eekelen et al., 2015), the Budyko method (Simons et al., 2020...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Msigwa, Hans C. Komakech, Elga Salvadore, Solomon Seyoum, Marloes L. Mul, Ann van Griensven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581821000896
_version_ 1819090430238654464
author Anna Msigwa
Hans C. Komakech
Elga Salvadore
Solomon Seyoum
Marloes L. Mul
Ann van Griensven
author_facet Anna Msigwa
Hans C. Komakech
Elga Salvadore
Solomon Seyoum
Marloes L. Mul
Ann van Griensven
author_sort Anna Msigwa
collection DOAJ
description Study area: Kikuletwa catchment, Upper Pangani River Basin, Tanzania. Study focus: This study compared yearly blue and green water fluxes using four different methods: Senay’s method (SN) (Senay et al., 2016), van Eekelen method (EK) (van Eekelen et al., 2015), the Budyko method (Simons et al., 2020) and the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model (FAO and IHE Delft, 2019). The yearly blue and green water fluxes of different Land Use Land Cover (LULC) classes were estimated using an ensemble of seven global remote sensing-based evapotranspiration products (Ensemble ET) and the CHIRPS rainfall dataset. The Ensemble ET was created from seven global RS-based surface energy balance models (GLEAM, CMRS-ET, SSEBop, ALEXI, SEBS, ETMonitor and MOD16). New hydrological insights: Our study found that the EK method was able to map blue and green water fluxes with realistic results for irrigated and non-irrigation cultivated areas. Budyko and SWB gave too high blue water fluxes for the non-irrigated agricultural areas, whereas the Budyko and SWB models were not able to show a clear difference in blue-water fluxes in irrigated versus non-irrigated areas. On the other hand, the SN method estimated no blue water fluxes in more than half of the identified irrigated areas.Three of the four methods estimate the highest blue water fluxes (318–582 mm/y) in forested areas, while the SWB model estimates the highest blue water fluxes in irrigated banana and coffee (278 mm/y). Overall, we conclude that the EK method yielded the most realistic spatial pattern of blue-water fluxes when compared to the irrigated land use map, whereas SWB could be considered after further calibration if higher temporal data resolution (e.g. monthly) is required.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:23:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-270edaccb35b4c489b753af1b55070d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-5818
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:23:42Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
spelling doaj.art-270edaccb35b4c489b753af1b55070d22022-12-21T18:48:16ZengElsevierJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies2214-58182021-08-0136100860Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensingAnna Msigwa0Hans C. Komakech1Elga Salvadore2Solomon Seyoum3Marloes L. Mul4Ann van Griensven5The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania; Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium; Corresponding author at: Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, TanzaniaVrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the NetherlandsVrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the NetherlandsIHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the NetherlandsVrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the NetherlandsStudy area: Kikuletwa catchment, Upper Pangani River Basin, Tanzania. Study focus: This study compared yearly blue and green water fluxes using four different methods: Senay’s method (SN) (Senay et al., 2016), van Eekelen method (EK) (van Eekelen et al., 2015), the Budyko method (Simons et al., 2020) and the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model (FAO and IHE Delft, 2019). The yearly blue and green water fluxes of different Land Use Land Cover (LULC) classes were estimated using an ensemble of seven global remote sensing-based evapotranspiration products (Ensemble ET) and the CHIRPS rainfall dataset. The Ensemble ET was created from seven global RS-based surface energy balance models (GLEAM, CMRS-ET, SSEBop, ALEXI, SEBS, ETMonitor and MOD16). New hydrological insights: Our study found that the EK method was able to map blue and green water fluxes with realistic results for irrigated and non-irrigation cultivated areas. Budyko and SWB gave too high blue water fluxes for the non-irrigated agricultural areas, whereas the Budyko and SWB models were not able to show a clear difference in blue-water fluxes in irrigated versus non-irrigated areas. On the other hand, the SN method estimated no blue water fluxes in more than half of the identified irrigated areas.Three of the four methods estimate the highest blue water fluxes (318–582 mm/y) in forested areas, while the SWB model estimates the highest blue water fluxes in irrigated banana and coffee (278 mm/y). Overall, we conclude that the EK method yielded the most realistic spatial pattern of blue-water fluxes when compared to the irrigated land use map, whereas SWB could be considered after further calibration if higher temporal data resolution (e.g. monthly) is required.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581821000896EvapotranspirationWater fluxesWater managementLand Use Land Cover
spellingShingle Anna Msigwa
Hans C. Komakech
Elga Salvadore
Solomon Seyoum
Marloes L. Mul
Ann van Griensven
Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Evapotranspiration
Water fluxes
Water management
Land Use Land Cover
title Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
title_full Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
title_fullStr Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
title_short Comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi-arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
title_sort comparison of blue and green water fluxes for different land use classes in a semi arid cultivated catchment using remote sensing
topic Evapotranspiration
Water fluxes
Water management
Land Use Land Cover
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581821000896
work_keys_str_mv AT annamsigwa comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing
AT hansckomakech comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing
AT elgasalvadore comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing
AT solomonseyoum comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing
AT marloeslmul comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing
AT annvangriensven comparisonofblueandgreenwaterfluxesfordifferentlanduseclassesinasemiaridcultivatedcatchmentusingremotesensing