COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS

During the prospective non-randomized study 340 patients were operated due to bone tumors in the volume of tumor removal with consequent defect replacement with megaprothesis of the hip (n = 52), knee (n = 254), ankle (n = 11) joints and total endoprosthesis of femur (n = 23). The combination of spi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. V. Garyaev, A. V. Sokolovskiy
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: New Terra Publishing House 2017-12-01
Series:Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/77
_version_ 1797702753068253184
author R. V. Garyaev
A. V. Sokolovskiy
author_facet R. V. Garyaev
A. V. Sokolovskiy
author_sort R. V. Garyaev
collection DOAJ
description During the prospective non-randomized study 340 patients were operated due to bone tumors in the volume of tumor removal with consequent defect replacement with megaprothesis of the hip (n = 52), knee (n = 254), ankle (n = 11) joints and total endoprosthesis of femur (n = 23). The combination of spinal or superficial general anesthesia with epidural (n = 101) or conduction (n = 239) analgesia was used for pain relief. The regional pain relief after surgery continued for 3-4 days. The level of pain, need for additional pain relief, frequency of failures and complications were studied as per the digit rating scale. The following nonparametric analysis methods were used for statistical processing: U-Mann-Whitney test or Fisher’s exact test. The number of patients with acceptable pain level after surgery and the need for additional pain relief were non statistically different in the groups with epidural or conduction pain relief. With post-surgery epidural pain relief compared to conduction analgesia arterial hypotension (12% versus 5%, p = 0.035) and dysuric disorders (5% versus 0.4%, p = 0.010) developed more often. The conduction analgesia turned out to be more complicated from technical point of view. Conclusion: given the similar efficiency of pain relief the conduction analgesia compared to epidural one has been followed by the less number of the side effects.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:54:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2712d55a1e204709aa3a07ca63754031
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-5658
2541-8653
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:54:32Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher New Terra Publishing House
record_format Article
series Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
spelling doaj.art-2712d55a1e204709aa3a07ca637540312023-09-03T09:15:38ZrusNew Terra Publishing HouseВестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии2078-56582541-86532017-12-01131374610.21292/2078-5658-2016-13-1-37-4677COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTSR. V. Garyaev0A. V. Sokolovskiy1ФГБНУ «Российский онкологический научный центр им. Н. Н. Блохина», МоскваФГБНУ «Российский онкологический научный центр им. Н. Н. Блохина», МоскваDuring the prospective non-randomized study 340 patients were operated due to bone tumors in the volume of tumor removal with consequent defect replacement with megaprothesis of the hip (n = 52), knee (n = 254), ankle (n = 11) joints and total endoprosthesis of femur (n = 23). The combination of spinal or superficial general anesthesia with epidural (n = 101) or conduction (n = 239) analgesia was used for pain relief. The regional pain relief after surgery continued for 3-4 days. The level of pain, need for additional pain relief, frequency of failures and complications were studied as per the digit rating scale. The following nonparametric analysis methods were used for statistical processing: U-Mann-Whitney test or Fisher’s exact test. The number of patients with acceptable pain level after surgery and the need for additional pain relief were non statistically different in the groups with epidural or conduction pain relief. With post-surgery epidural pain relief compared to conduction analgesia arterial hypotension (12% versus 5%, p = 0.035) and dysuric disorders (5% versus 0.4%, p = 0.010) developed more often. The conduction analgesia turned out to be more complicated from technical point of view. Conclusion: given the similar efficiency of pain relief the conduction analgesia compared to epidural one has been followed by the less number of the side effects.https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/77эпидуральная анальгезияпроводниковая анальгезияпослеоперационная анальгезия
spellingShingle R. V. Garyaev
A. V. Sokolovskiy
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии
эпидуральная анальгезия
проводниковая анальгезия
послеоперационная анальгезия
title COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
title_full COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
title_short COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY AND SAFETY OF THE PROLONGED EPIDURAL AND CONDUCTION ANALGESIA AFTER ENDOPROSTHESIS REPLACEMENT OF LARGE JOINTS OF LOWER LIMBS IN CANCER PATIENTS
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficiency and safety of the prolonged epidural and conduction analgesia after endoprosthesis replacement of large joints of lower limbs in cancer patients
topic эпидуральная анальгезия
проводниковая анальгезия
послеоперационная анальгезия
url https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/77
work_keys_str_mv AT rvgaryaev comparativeevaluationofefficiencyandsafetyoftheprolongedepiduralandconductionanalgesiaafterendoprosthesisreplacementoflargejointsoflowerlimbsincancerpatients
AT avsokolovskiy comparativeevaluationofefficiencyandsafetyoftheprolongedepiduralandconductionanalgesiaafterendoprosthesisreplacementoflargejointsoflowerlimbsincancerpatients