Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses

<p>A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the turbulent surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Uhlíková, T. Vihma, A. Y. Karpechko, P. Uotila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024-03-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/957/2024/tc-18-957-2024.pdf
_version_ 1797289579320967168
author T. Uhlíková
T. Vihma
A. Y. Karpechko
P. Uotila
author_facet T. Uhlíková
T. Vihma
A. Y. Karpechko
P. Uotila
author_sort T. Uhlíková
collection DOAJ
description <p>A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the turbulent surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising four global atmospheric reanalyses, ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and NCEP/CFSR (including both the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2)), and evaluate their uncertainties arising from inter-reanalysis differences in SIC and in the sensitivity of the turbulent surface fluxes to SIC. The magnitude of the differences in SIC is up to 0.15 but typically around 0.05 in most of the Arctic over all four seasons. Orthogonal-distance regression and ordinary-least-squares regression analyses indicate that the greatest sensitivity of both the latent and the sensible heat flux to SIC occurs in the cold season, November to April. For these months, using daily means of data, the average sensitivity is 400 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the latent heat flux and over 800 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC (change in SIC from 0 to 1), with differences between reanalyses that are as large as 300 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the latent heat flux and 600 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC. The sensitivity is highest for the NCEP/CFSR reanalysis. Comparing the periods 1980–2000 and 2001–2021, we find that the effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes has weakened owing to the increasing surface temperature of sea ice and sea-ice decline. The results also indicate signs of a decadal-scale improvement in the mutual agreement between reanalyses. The effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes arises mostly via the effect of SIC on atmosphere–surface differences in temperature and specific humidity, whereas the effect of SIC on wind speed (via surface roughness and atmospheric-boundary-layer stratification) partly cancels out in the turbulent surface fluxes, as the wind speed increases the magnitudes of both upward and downward fluxes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:07:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-272318e23db746698b00fff9e963b9cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T19:07:09Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-272318e23db746698b00fff9e963b9cd2024-03-01T06:30:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242024-03-011895797610.5194/tc-18-957-2024Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalysesT. Uhlíková0T. Vihma1A. Y. Karpechko2P. Uotila3Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, FinlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland<p>A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the turbulent surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising four global atmospheric reanalyses, ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and NCEP/CFSR (including both the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2)), and evaluate their uncertainties arising from inter-reanalysis differences in SIC and in the sensitivity of the turbulent surface fluxes to SIC. The magnitude of the differences in SIC is up to 0.15 but typically around 0.05 in most of the Arctic over all four seasons. Orthogonal-distance regression and ordinary-least-squares regression analyses indicate that the greatest sensitivity of both the latent and the sensible heat flux to SIC occurs in the cold season, November to April. For these months, using daily means of data, the average sensitivity is 400 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the latent heat flux and over 800 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC (change in SIC from 0 to 1), with differences between reanalyses that are as large as 300 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the latent heat flux and 600 <span class="inline-formula">W m<sup>−2</sup></span> for the sensible heat flux per unit of SIC. The sensitivity is highest for the NCEP/CFSR reanalysis. Comparing the periods 1980–2000 and 2001–2021, we find that the effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes has weakened owing to the increasing surface temperature of sea ice and sea-ice decline. The results also indicate signs of a decadal-scale improvement in the mutual agreement between reanalyses. The effect of SIC on turbulent surface fluxes arises mostly via the effect of SIC on atmosphere–surface differences in temperature and specific humidity, whereas the effect of SIC on wind speed (via surface roughness and atmospheric-boundary-layer stratification) partly cancels out in the turbulent surface fluxes, as the wind speed increases the magnitudes of both upward and downward fluxes.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/957/2024/tc-18-957-2024.pdf
spellingShingle T. Uhlíková
T. Vihma
A. Y. Karpechko
P. Uotila
Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
The Cryosphere
title Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
title_full Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
title_fullStr Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
title_short Effects of Arctic sea-ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
title_sort effects of arctic sea ice concentration on turbulent surface fluxes in four atmospheric reanalyses
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/957/2024/tc-18-957-2024.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tuhlikova effectsofarcticseaiceconcentrationonturbulentsurfacefluxesinfouratmosphericreanalyses
AT tvihma effectsofarcticseaiceconcentrationonturbulentsurfacefluxesinfouratmosphericreanalyses
AT aykarpechko effectsofarcticseaiceconcentrationonturbulentsurfacefluxesinfouratmosphericreanalyses
AT puotila effectsofarcticseaiceconcentrationonturbulentsurfacefluxesinfouratmosphericreanalyses