Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study

Background Differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis. Methods Adult patients with three or more episodes of wat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Yong Lee, So Yeon Lee, Yoo Jin Lee, Jin Wook Lee, Jeong Seok Kim, Ju Yup Lee, Byoung Kuk Jang, Woo Jin Chung, Kwang Bum Cho, Jae Seok Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical Science 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-jyms.org/upload/pdf/jyms-2023-00059.pdf
_version_ 1797644628417052672
author Jae Yong Lee
So Yeon Lee
Yoo Jin Lee
Jin Wook Lee
Jeong Seok Kim
Ju Yup Lee
Byoung Kuk Jang
Woo Jin Chung
Kwang Bum Cho
Jae Seok Hwang
author_facet Jae Yong Lee
So Yeon Lee
Yoo Jin Lee
Jin Wook Lee
Jeong Seok Kim
Ju Yup Lee
Byoung Kuk Jang
Woo Jin Chung
Kwang Bum Cho
Jae Seok Hwang
author_sort Jae Yong Lee
collection DOAJ
description Background Differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis. Methods Adult patients with three or more episodes of watery diarrhea and colitis symptoms within 14 days of a hospital visit were eligible for this study. The patients’ stool pathogen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results, serum PCT levels, and serum CRP levels were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into bacterial and nonbacterial colitis groups according to their PCR. The laboratory data were compared between the two groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results In total, 636 patients were included; 186 in the bacterial colitis group and 450 in the nonbacterial colitis group. In the bacterial colitis group, Clostridium perfringens was the commonest pathogen (n=70), followed by Clostridium difficile toxin B (n=60). The AUC for PCT and CRP was 0.557 and 0.567, respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bacterial colitis were 54.8% and 52.6% for PCT, and 52.2% and 54.2% for CRP, respectively. Combining PCT and CRP measurements did not increase the discrimination performance (AUC, 0.522; 95% confidence interval, 0.474–0.571). Conclusion Neither PCT nor CRP helped discriminate bacterial colitis from nonbacterial colitis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:34:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2723bfa63ddb48afbf539806340a9ce6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2799-8010
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:34:03Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical Science
record_format Article
series Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
spelling doaj.art-2723bfa63ddb48afbf539806340a9ce62023-10-31T05:42:23ZengYeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical ScienceJournal of Yeungnam Medical Science2799-80102023-10-0140438839310.12701/jyms.2023.000592775Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective studyJae Yong Lee0So Yeon Lee1Yoo Jin LeeJin Wook Lee2Jeong Seok Kim3Ju Yup Lee4Byoung Kuk Jang5Woo Jin Chung6Kwang Bum Cho7Jae Seok Hwang8 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, KoreaBackground Differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis. Methods Adult patients with three or more episodes of watery diarrhea and colitis symptoms within 14 days of a hospital visit were eligible for this study. The patients’ stool pathogen polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results, serum PCT levels, and serum CRP levels were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into bacterial and nonbacterial colitis groups according to their PCR. The laboratory data were compared between the two groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results In total, 636 patients were included; 186 in the bacterial colitis group and 450 in the nonbacterial colitis group. In the bacterial colitis group, Clostridium perfringens was the commonest pathogen (n=70), followed by Clostridium difficile toxin B (n=60). The AUC for PCT and CRP was 0.557 and 0.567, respectively, indicating poor discrimination. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bacterial colitis were 54.8% and 52.6% for PCT, and 52.2% and 54.2% for CRP, respectively. Combining PCT and CRP measurements did not increase the discrimination performance (AUC, 0.522; 95% confidence interval, 0.474–0.571). Conclusion Neither PCT nor CRP helped discriminate bacterial colitis from nonbacterial colitis.http://www.e-jyms.org/upload/pdf/jyms-2023-00059.pdfdifferential diagnosisdysenteryinfectionsprocalcitonin
spellingShingle Jae Yong Lee
So Yeon Lee
Yoo Jin Lee
Jin Wook Lee
Jeong Seok Kim
Ju Yup Lee
Byoung Kuk Jang
Woo Jin Chung
Kwang Bum Cho
Jae Seok Hwang
Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
differential diagnosis
dysentery
infections
procalcitonin
title Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
title_full Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
title_short Diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis: a retrospective study
title_sort diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin and c reactive protein in discriminating between bacterial and nonbacterial colitis a retrospective study
topic differential diagnosis
dysentery
infections
procalcitonin
url http://www.e-jyms.org/upload/pdf/jyms-2023-00059.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaeyonglee diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT soyeonlee diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT yoojinlee diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT jinwooklee diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT jeongseokkim diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT juyuplee diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT byoungkukjang diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT woojinchung diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT kwangbumcho diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy
AT jaeseokhwang diagnosticvalueofserumprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinindiscriminatingbetweenbacterialandnonbacterialcolitisaretrospectivestudy