De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique

This article shows how the notion of “participant observation”, theorized in the twentieth century, has its roots in Renaissance travel stories, where immersion into foreign societies is experimented. While the legitimacy of these testimonies is inherited from the judicial paradigm, legal writings b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grégoire Holtz
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Clio et Themis 2019-06-01
Series:Clio@Themis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/485
_version_ 1798037762688942080
author Grégoire Holtz
author_facet Grégoire Holtz
author_sort Grégoire Holtz
collection DOAJ
description This article shows how the notion of “participant observation”, theorized in the twentieth century, has its roots in Renaissance travel stories, where immersion into foreign societies is experimented. While the legitimacy of these testimonies is inherited from the judicial paradigm, legal writings borrow many references to “pre-ethnographic” stories to justify their purposes. These early forms of “participant observation” are both legitimized and weakened by the experience of immersion, which sometimes approaches “ensauvagement”.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:30:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-272828d7facb434080562355c8ccbb00
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2105-0929
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:30:59Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Association Clio et Themis
record_format Article
series Clio@Themis
spelling doaj.art-272828d7facb434080562355c8ccbb002022-12-22T04:02:00ZfraAssociation Clio et ThemisClio@Themis2105-09292019-06-0116De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologiqueGrégoire HoltzThis article shows how the notion of “participant observation”, theorized in the twentieth century, has its roots in Renaissance travel stories, where immersion into foreign societies is experimented. While the legitimacy of these testimonies is inherited from the judicial paradigm, legal writings borrow many references to “pre-ethnographic” stories to justify their purposes. These early forms of “participant observation” are both legitimized and weakened by the experience of immersion, which sometimes approaches “ensauvagement”.http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/485accountparticipant observationlegitimizationoathotherness
spellingShingle Grégoire Holtz
De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
Clio@Themis
account
participant observation
legitimization
oath
otherness
title De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
title_full De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
title_fullStr De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
title_full_unstemmed De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
title_short De l’« ensauvagement » à l’observation participante : archéologie d’une catégorie anthropologique
title_sort de l ensauvagement a l observation participante archeologie d une categorie anthropologique
topic account
participant observation
legitimization
oath
otherness
url http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/485
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoireholtz delensauvagementalobservationparticipantearcheologiedunecategorieanthropologique