Response to “Every ROSE has its thorns”
Abstract Sharp et al. [1] raise a number of concerns about the development and communication of ROSES (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses), and we welcome the opportunity to explain some of the underlying thinking behind development of the reporting standards for environmental evi...
Main Authors: | Neal R. Haddaway, Biljana Macura, Paul Whaley, Andrew S. Pullin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Environmental Evidence |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-018-0133-3 |
Similar Items
-
Every rose has it′s thorn!
by: Ambika Gopalakrishnan Unnikrishnan, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps
by: Neal R. Haddaway, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Roses among the thorns : females regulars in the military.
by: Wong, Chun Yan.
Published: (2011) -
Academic gardening: from the sweet perfume of roses to the narrowness of their thorns
by: Inacia Sátiro Xavier de França
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Roses with or without thorns? A theoretical model of workplace friendship
by: Yongjun Choi, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)