Demystifying the Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Context
The aim of this review is to describe the different statistical methods used in estimating the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the assessment of quality of life (QOL)-related and clinical improvement interventions, along with their implementation in cardiothoracic surgery. A thoro...
Main Authors: | Dimitrios E. Magouliotis, Metaxia Bareka, Arian Arjomandi Rad, Grigorios Christodoulidis, Thanos Athanasiou |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Life |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/3/716 |
Similar Items
-
Minimal clinically important difference as a method for assessing the effectiveness of spinal surgery using scales and questionnaires: non-systematic literature review
by: Olga N. Leonova, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures—a systematic review
by: Åsa Nordin, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Minimal clinically important difference for the Mandarin version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire determined via anchor-based and distribution-based methods
by: Hailing Gu, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values
by: Siddhartha Maredupaka, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Achievement of Substantial Reperfusion With Endovascular Thrombectomy Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment
by: Chun-Jen Lin, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)