Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility

This study developed decision-making factors to classify electromagnetic pulse (EMP) protection levels and determine various protection measures. We proposed three EMP protection levels of 80, 60, and 40 dB by considering the characteristics of military equipment and factors that determine EMP prote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kukjoo Kim, Young-Jun Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/11/5227
_version_ 1797531360304300032
author Kukjoo Kim
Young-Jun Park
author_facet Kukjoo Kim
Young-Jun Park
author_sort Kukjoo Kim
collection DOAJ
description This study developed decision-making factors to classify electromagnetic pulse (EMP) protection levels and determine various protection measures. We proposed three EMP protection levels of 80, 60, and 40 dB by considering the characteristics of military equipment and factors that determine EMP protection level, based on a Delphi study. We modeled EMP protection facilities for brigade-level troops to evaluate the derived decision-making factors and applicability of differential protection levels. The natural attenuation effect of soil was confirmed for structures installed underground. The shielding effect of wet soil was up to 30 dB. Considering the 20 dB EMP resistance of military equipment and the 30 dB of attenuation of wet soil, new materials with 30 dB of shielding efficiency could be used to meet an EMP protection level of 80 dB. Therefore, we confirmed that EMP protection measures could be established to build mobile, lightweight shelters. If lightweight shelters are constructed by applying the differential protection level scheme, they can be applied as a more effective EMP protection measure. Furthermore, differential protection measures can be adopted as a sustainable defense facility policy approach, wherein lightweight protection facilities replace conventional heavyweight facilities.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:42:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-275978e953a941ce8a60206b5cc002d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:42:40Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-275978e953a941ce8a60206b5cc002d62023-11-21T22:49:16ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-06-011111522710.3390/app11115227Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection FacilityKukjoo Kim0Young-Jun Park1Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy, Seoul 01805, KoreaDepartment of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy, Seoul 01805, KoreaThis study developed decision-making factors to classify electromagnetic pulse (EMP) protection levels and determine various protection measures. We proposed three EMP protection levels of 80, 60, and 40 dB by considering the characteristics of military equipment and factors that determine EMP protection level, based on a Delphi study. We modeled EMP protection facilities for brigade-level troops to evaluate the derived decision-making factors and applicability of differential protection levels. The natural attenuation effect of soil was confirmed for structures installed underground. The shielding effect of wet soil was up to 30 dB. Considering the 20 dB EMP resistance of military equipment and the 30 dB of attenuation of wet soil, new materials with 30 dB of shielding efficiency could be used to meet an EMP protection level of 80 dB. Therefore, we confirmed that EMP protection measures could be established to build mobile, lightweight shelters. If lightweight shelters are constructed by applying the differential protection level scheme, they can be applied as a more effective EMP protection measure. Furthermore, differential protection measures can be adopted as a sustainable defense facility policy approach, wherein lightweight protection facilities replace conventional heavyweight facilities.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/11/5227electromagnetic pulse (EMP)shielding effectiveness (SE)EMP protection levelEMP protection facilityMETT + TC
spellingShingle Kukjoo Kim
Young-Jun Park
Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
Applied Sciences
electromagnetic pulse (EMP)
shielding effectiveness (SE)
EMP protection level
EMP protection facility
METT + TC
title Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
title_full Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
title_fullStr Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
title_full_unstemmed Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
title_short Development of Decision-Making Factors to Determine EMP Protection Level: A Case Study of a Brigade-Level EMP Protection Facility
title_sort development of decision making factors to determine emp protection level a case study of a brigade level emp protection facility
topic electromagnetic pulse (EMP)
shielding effectiveness (SE)
EMP protection level
EMP protection facility
METT + TC
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/11/5227
work_keys_str_mv AT kukjookim developmentofdecisionmakingfactorstodetermineempprotectionlevelacasestudyofabrigadelevelempprotectionfacility
AT youngjunpark developmentofdecisionmakingfactorstodetermineempprotectionlevelacasestudyofabrigadelevelempprotectionfacility