The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients

Background: Perioperative infarcts are a known complication that can occur during the resection of glioblastoma (GBM). Recent studies suggest that gross total and even “supra-total” resections may be associated with an increased survival but the rate of complications, including perioperative ischemi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jakob T. Lupa, Jeffrey J. Raizer, Irene B. Helenowski, Benjamin P. Liu, Kartik Kesavabhotla, Matthew C. Tate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00706/full
_version_ 1828752501098151936
author Jakob T. Lupa
Jeffrey J. Raizer
Irene B. Helenowski
Benjamin P. Liu
Benjamin P. Liu
Kartik Kesavabhotla
Matthew C. Tate
Matthew C. Tate
author_facet Jakob T. Lupa
Jeffrey J. Raizer
Irene B. Helenowski
Benjamin P. Liu
Benjamin P. Liu
Kartik Kesavabhotla
Matthew C. Tate
Matthew C. Tate
author_sort Jakob T. Lupa
collection DOAJ
description Background: Perioperative infarcts are a known complication that can occur during the resection of glioblastoma (GBM). Recent studies suggest that gross total and even “supra-total” resections may be associated with an increased survival but the rate of complications, including perioperative ischemia, may increase with these more aggressive resection strategies. However, little is known about the impact that perioperative infarcts have on survival, functional outcomes, and tumor recurrence patterns. Our study attempted to quantify and characterize the functional consequences of a perioperative infarct, as well as risk factors associated with occurrence.Methods: Seventy-three patients with a diagnosis of GBM and perioperative ischemia by MRI were identified from the electronic medical record system. We obtained demographic, prognostic, and stroke risk factor data. Infarct volumes were calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI scans, and subjects were segregated into an infarct cohort or a control cohort based on whether the identified lesion appeared to be an infarct in an arterial distribution or instead appeared to be expected postoperative changes. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed on the dataset.Results: Median age was 58.6 years, median post-op KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) was 90, and median extent of resection (based on MRI) was 97.8%. Overall, perioperative arterial infarcts were uncommon (2.0%), did not have a statistically significant impact on survival (17.9 vs. 18.9 months), did not worsen neurologic function, and did not alter the pattern of recurrence.Conclusion: Perioperative arterial infarcts were uncommon in our patients despite aggressive resection and when present had no impact on survival or neurologic function. Given the clear benefit of maximal tumor resection, the risk of perioperative infarct should not deter maximal safe resection.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:10:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2765d77409354b369ff61372b48be424
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:10:44Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-2765d77409354b369ff61372b48be4242022-12-22T01:33:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-05-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00706542247The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma PatientsJakob T. Lupa0Jeffrey J. Raizer1Irene B. Helenowski2Benjamin P. Liu3Benjamin P. Liu4Kartik Kesavabhotla5Matthew C. Tate6Matthew C. Tate7Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United StatesBackground: Perioperative infarcts are a known complication that can occur during the resection of glioblastoma (GBM). Recent studies suggest that gross total and even “supra-total” resections may be associated with an increased survival but the rate of complications, including perioperative ischemia, may increase with these more aggressive resection strategies. However, little is known about the impact that perioperative infarcts have on survival, functional outcomes, and tumor recurrence patterns. Our study attempted to quantify and characterize the functional consequences of a perioperative infarct, as well as risk factors associated with occurrence.Methods: Seventy-three patients with a diagnosis of GBM and perioperative ischemia by MRI were identified from the electronic medical record system. We obtained demographic, prognostic, and stroke risk factor data. Infarct volumes were calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI scans, and subjects were segregated into an infarct cohort or a control cohort based on whether the identified lesion appeared to be an infarct in an arterial distribution or instead appeared to be expected postoperative changes. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed on the dataset.Results: Median age was 58.6 years, median post-op KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) was 90, and median extent of resection (based on MRI) was 97.8%. Overall, perioperative arterial infarcts were uncommon (2.0%), did not have a statistically significant impact on survival (17.9 vs. 18.9 months), did not worsen neurologic function, and did not alter the pattern of recurrence.Conclusion: Perioperative arterial infarcts were uncommon in our patients despite aggressive resection and when present had no impact on survival or neurologic function. Given the clear benefit of maximal tumor resection, the risk of perioperative infarct should not deter maximal safe resection.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00706/fullglioblastomainfarctresectionrecurrencesurvival
spellingShingle Jakob T. Lupa
Jeffrey J. Raizer
Irene B. Helenowski
Benjamin P. Liu
Benjamin P. Liu
Kartik Kesavabhotla
Matthew C. Tate
Matthew C. Tate
The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
Frontiers in Oncology
glioblastoma
infarct
resection
recurrence
survival
title The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
title_full The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
title_fullStr The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
title_short The Impact of Perioperative Arterial Infarct on Recurrence, Functional Outcomes, and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients
title_sort impact of perioperative arterial infarct on recurrence functional outcomes and survival in glioblastoma patients
topic glioblastoma
infarct
resection
recurrence
survival
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00706/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobtlupa theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT jeffreyjraizer theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT irenebhelenowski theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT benjaminpliu theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT benjaminpliu theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT kartikkesavabhotla theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT matthewctate theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT matthewctate theimpactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT jakobtlupa impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT jeffreyjraizer impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT irenebhelenowski impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT benjaminpliu impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT benjaminpliu impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT kartikkesavabhotla impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT matthewctate impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients
AT matthewctate impactofperioperativearterialinfarctonrecurrencefunctionaloutcomesandsurvivalinglioblastomapatients