Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex

The process by which visual information is incorporated into the brain’s spatial framework to represent landmarks is poorly understood. Studies in humans and rodents suggest that retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays a key role in these computations. We developed an RSC-dependent behavioral task in which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas F Fischer, Raul Mojica Soto-Albors, Friederike Buck, Mark T Harnett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2020-03-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/51458
_version_ 1811201005260374016
author Lukas F Fischer
Raul Mojica Soto-Albors
Friederike Buck
Mark T Harnett
author_facet Lukas F Fischer
Raul Mojica Soto-Albors
Friederike Buck
Mark T Harnett
author_sort Lukas F Fischer
collection DOAJ
description The process by which visual information is incorporated into the brain’s spatial framework to represent landmarks is poorly understood. Studies in humans and rodents suggest that retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays a key role in these computations. We developed an RSC-dependent behavioral task in which head-fixed mice learned the spatial relationship between visual landmark cues and hidden reward locations. Two-photon imaging revealed that these cues served as dominant reference points for most task-active neurons and anchored the spatial code in RSC. This encoding was more robust after task acquisition. Decoupling the virtual environment from mouse behavior degraded spatial representations and provided evidence that supralinear integration of visual and motor inputs contributes to landmark encoding. V1 axons recorded in RSC were less modulated by task engagement but showed surprisingly similar spatial tuning. Our data indicate that landmark representations in RSC are the result of local integration of visual, motor, and spatial information.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:14:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2774605f1731484aa0b053cd96c0600d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:14:21Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-2774605f1731484aa0b053cd96c0600d2022-12-22T03:52:18ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2020-03-01910.7554/eLife.51458Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortexLukas F Fischer0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-3798Raul Mojica Soto-Albors1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6987-5417Friederike Buck2Mark T Harnett3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5301-1139Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United StatesDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United StatesDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United StatesDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United StatesThe process by which visual information is incorporated into the brain’s spatial framework to represent landmarks is poorly understood. Studies in humans and rodents suggest that retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays a key role in these computations. We developed an RSC-dependent behavioral task in which head-fixed mice learned the spatial relationship between visual landmark cues and hidden reward locations. Two-photon imaging revealed that these cues served as dominant reference points for most task-active neurons and anchored the spatial code in RSC. This encoding was more robust after task acquisition. Decoupling the virtual environment from mouse behavior degraded spatial representations and provided evidence that supralinear integration of visual and motor inputs contributes to landmark encoding. V1 axons recorded in RSC were less modulated by task engagement but showed surprisingly similar spatial tuning. Our data indicate that landmark representations in RSC are the result of local integration of visual, motor, and spatial information.https://elifesciences.org/articles/51458retrosplenial cortexsensorimotor integrationspatial navigationvisual cortexpopulation imagingbehavior
spellingShingle Lukas F Fischer
Raul Mojica Soto-Albors
Friederike Buck
Mark T Harnett
Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
eLife
retrosplenial cortex
sensorimotor integration
spatial navigation
visual cortex
population imaging
behavior
title Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
title_full Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
title_fullStr Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
title_full_unstemmed Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
title_short Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
title_sort representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex
topic retrosplenial cortex
sensorimotor integration
spatial navigation
visual cortex
population imaging
behavior
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/51458
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasffischer representationofvisuallandmarksinretrosplenialcortex
AT raulmojicasotoalbors representationofvisuallandmarksinretrosplenialcortex
AT friederikebuck representationofvisuallandmarksinretrosplenialcortex
AT marktharnett representationofvisuallandmarksinretrosplenialcortex