Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) versus 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification (C-MICS). Patients and methods This prospective, interventional, randomized, comparative clinical study was carried out on 60 cataractous eyes. Thirty pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarek R El-Lakkany, Ashraf M Swellam, Hamza Abd El-Hameed, Hossam T Al-Sharkawy, Rania K Farag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2018;volume=111;issue=2;spage=82;epage=89;aulast=El-Lakkany
_version_ 1811194814229643264
author Tarek R El-Lakkany
Ashraf M Swellam
Hamza Abd El-Hameed
Hossam T Al-Sharkawy
Rania K Farag
author_facet Tarek R El-Lakkany
Ashraf M Swellam
Hamza Abd El-Hameed
Hossam T Al-Sharkawy
Rania K Farag
author_sort Tarek R El-Lakkany
collection DOAJ
description Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) versus 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification (C-MICS). Patients and methods This prospective, interventional, randomized, comparative clinical study was carried out on 60 cataractous eyes. Thirty patients were managed surgically by C-MICS through a 2.2 mm mean incision and 30 patients were managed surgically by B-MICS through a 1.2–1.4 mm trapezoidal incision. The main outcomes measures were postoperative best-corrected distant visual acuity, postoperative spherical equivalent, higher-order aberrations, corneal thickness, corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL), and complications during and after surgery. Both groups were compared for all variables preoperatively. Results The visual rehabilitation in group B was faster than that in group A (nonsignificant). There were nonstatistically significant differences, in the best-corrected visual acuity, between both groups throughout the postoperative period. The mean ECL was statistically significantly higher in group A (221.2±44.1) compared with group B (167.5±67.9) (P<0.001). The mean central corneal thickness change was significantly greater in group A than group B (P=0.01). The surgically induced astigmatism was statistically significantly improved in B-MICS (group B) than C-MICS (group A) (P=0.001). For the other corneal aberrations, there were nonsignificant differences between the two groups. No differences were found in the complications during surgeries between the two groups of cataract surgery. Conclusion The two techniques are reliable, functional, effective, and yield good visual outcomes and low complication rates. B-MICS with the smallest incision induces less astigmatism (surgically induced astigmatism), less ECL, fewer central corneal thickness changes, and enables earlier visual rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:32:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-277c3a7868ed4e26957f1e46de8fd850
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-0686
2314-6648
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:32:48Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
spelling doaj.art-277c3a7868ed4e26957f1e46de8fd8502022-12-22T03:55:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society2090-06862314-66482018-01-011112828910.4103/ejos.ejos_47_17Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsificationTarek R El-LakkanyAshraf M SwellamHamza Abd El-HameedHossam T Al-SharkawyRania K FaragPurpose To compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery (B-MICS) versus 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification (C-MICS). Patients and methods This prospective, interventional, randomized, comparative clinical study was carried out on 60 cataractous eyes. Thirty patients were managed surgically by C-MICS through a 2.2 mm mean incision and 30 patients were managed surgically by B-MICS through a 1.2–1.4 mm trapezoidal incision. The main outcomes measures were postoperative best-corrected distant visual acuity, postoperative spherical equivalent, higher-order aberrations, corneal thickness, corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL), and complications during and after surgery. Both groups were compared for all variables preoperatively. Results The visual rehabilitation in group B was faster than that in group A (nonsignificant). There were nonstatistically significant differences, in the best-corrected visual acuity, between both groups throughout the postoperative period. The mean ECL was statistically significantly higher in group A (221.2±44.1) compared with group B (167.5±67.9) (P<0.001). The mean central corneal thickness change was significantly greater in group A than group B (P=0.01). The surgically induced astigmatism was statistically significantly improved in B-MICS (group B) than C-MICS (group A) (P=0.001). For the other corneal aberrations, there were nonsignificant differences between the two groups. No differences were found in the complications during surgeries between the two groups of cataract surgery. Conclusion The two techniques are reliable, functional, effective, and yield good visual outcomes and low complication rates. B-MICS with the smallest incision induces less astigmatism (surgically induced astigmatism), less ECL, fewer central corneal thickness changes, and enables earlier visual rehabilitation.http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2018;volume=111;issue=2;spage=82;epage=89;aulast=El-Lakkanybi-manual microinscion cataract surgery
spellingShingle Tarek R El-Lakkany
Ashraf M Swellam
Hamza Abd El-Hameed
Hossam T Al-Sharkawy
Rania K Farag
Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
bi-manual microinscion cataract surgery
title Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
title_full Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
title_fullStr Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
title_short Outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2.2-mm coaxial phacoemulsification
title_sort outcomes of bimanual microincision cataract surgery and 2 2 mm coaxial phacoemulsification
topic bi-manual microinscion cataract surgery
url http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2018;volume=111;issue=2;spage=82;epage=89;aulast=El-Lakkany
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekrellakkany outcomesofbimanualmicroincisioncataractsurgeryand22mmcoaxialphacoemulsification
AT ashrafmswellam outcomesofbimanualmicroincisioncataractsurgeryand22mmcoaxialphacoemulsification
AT hamzaabdelhameed outcomesofbimanualmicroincisioncataractsurgeryand22mmcoaxialphacoemulsification
AT hossamtalsharkawy outcomesofbimanualmicroincisioncataractsurgeryand22mmcoaxialphacoemulsification
AT raniakfarag outcomesofbimanualmicroincisioncataractsurgeryand22mmcoaxialphacoemulsification