Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors

Potential safety issues have been one area of concern in policy debates over micromobility transportation. Existing research has mostly explored micromobility safety from a medical perspective. To inform transportation policy strategies to try and improve safety performance, this paper explores the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kevin Fang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198222000379
_version_ 1818470631851687936
author Kevin Fang
author_facet Kevin Fang
author_sort Kevin Fang
collection DOAJ
description Potential safety issues have been one area of concern in policy debates over micromobility transportation. Existing research has mostly explored micromobility safety from a medical perspective. To inform transportation policy strategies to try and improve safety performance, this paper explores the circumstances in which injured micromobility riders sustained their injuries, with a focus on factors related to the transportation system. Data comes from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a United States national sample of emergency room visits. Information on injury circumstances is mostly not coded by default in NEISS data, but detail was scraped from reading a short narrative comment line with each case. Crashes with motor vehicles were the most frequently mentioned transportation-related injury circumstance in the data. Pavement condition and hilly train were among other measurable transportation-related factors. Crashes are particularly problematic as logistic regression modeling shows that patients who crashed with motor vehicles were about 150 percent more likely to be hospitalized and 30 percent more likely to suffer a head injury. After controlling for demographics and injury circumstances, some variation in hospitalization risk was found between micromobility devices. In particular, patients who were injured riding motorized bicycles and motorized scooters had higher likelihoods of hospitalization versus riders of human-powered bicycles. Patients riding kick scooters and devices presumed to be Segways had lower likelihoods of hospitalization versus bicycles.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:39:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-277c8bb289204ec0a21dac9ac4fde3e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-1982
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:39:36Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
spelling doaj.art-277c8bb289204ec0a21dac9ac4fde3e02022-12-22T02:28:49ZengElsevierTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives2590-19822022-06-0114100574Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factorsKevin Fang0Sonoma State University, Department of Geography, Environment, and Planning, California, USAPotential safety issues have been one area of concern in policy debates over micromobility transportation. Existing research has mostly explored micromobility safety from a medical perspective. To inform transportation policy strategies to try and improve safety performance, this paper explores the circumstances in which injured micromobility riders sustained their injuries, with a focus on factors related to the transportation system. Data comes from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a United States national sample of emergency room visits. Information on injury circumstances is mostly not coded by default in NEISS data, but detail was scraped from reading a short narrative comment line with each case. Crashes with motor vehicles were the most frequently mentioned transportation-related injury circumstance in the data. Pavement condition and hilly train were among other measurable transportation-related factors. Crashes are particularly problematic as logistic regression modeling shows that patients who crashed with motor vehicles were about 150 percent more likely to be hospitalized and 30 percent more likely to suffer a head injury. After controlling for demographics and injury circumstances, some variation in hospitalization risk was found between micromobility devices. In particular, patients who were injured riding motorized bicycles and motorized scooters had higher likelihoods of hospitalization versus riders of human-powered bicycles. Patients riding kick scooters and devices presumed to be Segways had lower likelihoods of hospitalization versus bicycles.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198222000379MicromobilityScootersBicyclesSkateboardsHoverboardsSegway
spellingShingle Kevin Fang
Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Micromobility
Scooters
Bicycles
Skateboards
Hoverboards
Segway
title Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
title_full Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
title_fullStr Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
title_full_unstemmed Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
title_short Micromobility injury events: Motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
title_sort micromobility injury events motor vehicle crashes and other transportation systems factors
topic Micromobility
Scooters
Bicycles
Skateboards
Hoverboards
Segway
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198222000379
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinfang micromobilityinjuryeventsmotorvehiclecrashesandothertransportationsystemsfactors