Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India

With the advent of the internet and increasing circulation of hate speech, and material that has been linked to public order disturbances, there has been a shift in the legal discourse around hate speech. What has emerged, especially post the striking down of section 66A of the Information Technolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Siddharth Narrain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2019-02-01
Series:Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018103388
_version_ 1819163442423005184
author Siddharth Narrain
author_facet Siddharth Narrain
author_sort Siddharth Narrain
collection DOAJ
description With the advent of the internet and increasing circulation of hate speech, and material that has been linked to public order disturbances, there has been a shift in the legal discourse around hate speech. What has emerged, especially post the striking down of section 66A of the Information Technology Act, are categories such as 'objectionable', 'provocative' content. The focus has shifted from the content itself, what it says, and the intention of the author, to being able to pre-empt the circulation of such material. Law is increasingly invoked to prevent speech (through prior restraint) rather than post facto investigation and prosecutions. This in turn has given rise to a range of institutional mechanisms such as monitoring labs that are now part of policing practice. Additionally, civil society organizations are now collaborating with police to help trigger mechanisms to take content off internet platforms. Increasingly it is through keywords and algorithmic searches that the category of hate speech has been defined rather than traditional legal doctrine. In the words of Lawrence Lessig, code plays the role of law, and the architecture of the internet becomes policy. This paper will examine the issues outlined above relying heavily on a series of interviews with lawyers, policy analysts, journalists, academics, civil society activists, and police personnel conducted in Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai and Pune.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T17:44:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-279d8dc0ab8145bb946284190d6a1062
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-1525
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T17:44:12Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
record_format Article
series Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
spelling doaj.art-279d8dc0ab8145bb946284190d6a10622022-12-21T18:18:20ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252019-02-01103388-404388-40410.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018103388Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in IndiaSiddharth NarrainWith the advent of the internet and increasing circulation of hate speech, and material that has been linked to public order disturbances, there has been a shift in the legal discourse around hate speech. What has emerged, especially post the striking down of section 66A of the Information Technology Act, are categories such as 'objectionable', 'provocative' content. The focus has shifted from the content itself, what it says, and the intention of the author, to being able to pre-empt the circulation of such material. Law is increasingly invoked to prevent speech (through prior restraint) rather than post facto investigation and prosecutions. This in turn has given rise to a range of institutional mechanisms such as monitoring labs that are now part of policing practice. Additionally, civil society organizations are now collaborating with police to help trigger mechanisms to take content off internet platforms. Increasingly it is through keywords and algorithmic searches that the category of hate speech has been defined rather than traditional legal doctrine. In the words of Lawrence Lessig, code plays the role of law, and the architecture of the internet becomes policy. This paper will examine the issues outlined above relying heavily on a series of interviews with lawyers, policy analysts, journalists, academics, civil society activists, and police personnel conducted in Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai and Pune.http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018103388hate speechpublic orderobjectionable contentsocial mediapolicingInternet intermediariesfree speechreasonable restrictions
spellingShingle Siddharth Narrain
Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
hate speech
public order
objectionable content
social media
policing
Internet intermediaries
free speech
reasonable restrictions
title Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
title_full Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
title_fullStr Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
title_full_unstemmed Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
title_short Social Media, Violence and the Law: 'Objectionable Material' and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India
title_sort social media violence and the law objectionable material and the changing countours of hate speech regulation in india
topic hate speech
public order
objectionable content
social media
policing
Internet intermediaries
free speech
reasonable restrictions
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.2018103388
work_keys_str_mv AT siddharthnarrain socialmediaviolenceandthelawobjectionablematerialandthechangingcountoursofhatespeechregulationinindia